Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre (original) (raw)

Nature volume 485, pages 381–385 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In eukaryotes transcriptional regulation often involves multiple long-range elements and is influenced by the genomic environment1. A prime example of this concerns the mouse X-inactivation centre (Xic), which orchestrates the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) by controlling the expression of the non-protein-coding Xist transcript. The extent of Xic sequences required for the proper regulation of Xist remains unknown. Here we use chromosome conformation capture carbon-copy (5C)2 and super-resolution microscopy to analyse the spatial organization of a 4.5-megabases (Mb) region including Xist. We discover a series of discrete 200-kilobase to 1 Mb topologically associating domains (TADs), present both before and after cell differentiation and on the active and inactive X. TADs align with, but do not rely on, several domain-wide features of the epigenome, such as H3K27me3 or H3K9me2 blocks and lamina-associated domains. TADs also align with coordinately regulated gene clusters. Disruption of a TAD boundary causes ectopic chromosomal contacts and long-range transcriptional misregulation. The Xist/Tsix sense/antisense unit illustrates how TADs enable the spatial segregation of oppositely regulated chromosomal neighbourhoods, with the respective promoters of Xist and Tsix lying in adjacent TADs, each containing their known positive regulators. We identify a novel distal regulatory region of Tsix within its TAD, which produces a long intervening RNA, Linx. In addition to uncovering a new principle of _cis_-regulatory architecture of mammalian chromosomes, our study sets the stage for the full genetic dissection of the X-inactivation centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

High-throughput data are deposited in Gene ExpressionOmnibus under accession number GSE35721 for all 5C experiments and GSE34243 for expression microarrays.

References

  1. Kleinjan, D. A. & Lettice, L. A. Long-range gene control and genetic disease. Adv. Genet. 61, 339–388 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Rastan, S. Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mouse X-autosome translocation embryos–location of the inactivation centre. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 78, 1–22 (1983)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Rastan, S. & Robertson, E. J. X-chromosome deletions in embryo-derived (EK) cell lines associated with lack of X-chromosome inactivation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90, 379–388 (1985)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Augui, S., Nora, E. P. & Heard, E. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 429–442 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Anguera, M. C. et al. Tsx produces a long noncoding RNA and has general functions in the germline, stem cells, and brain. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002248 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Heard, E., Mongelard, F., Arnaud, D. & Avner, P. Xist yeast artificial chromosome transgenes function as X-inactivation centers only in multicopy arrays and not as single copies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3156–3156 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Marks, H. et al. High-resolution analysis of epigenetic changes associated with X inactivation. Genome Res. 19, 1361–1373 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Pauler, F. M. et al. H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome. Genome Res. 19, 221–233 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Wen, B., Wu, H., Shinkai, Y., Irizarry, R. A. & Feinberg, A. P. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 41, 246–250 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Lienert, F. et al. Genomic prevalence of heterochromatic H3K9me2 and transcription do not discriminate pluripotent from terminally differentiated cells. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002090 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, R. D. et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479–491 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Rougeulle, C. et al. Differential histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation profiles on the X chromosome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 5475–5484 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Montgomery, N. D. et al. The murine polycomb group protein Eed is required for global histone H3 lysine-27 methylation. Curr. Biol. 15, 942–947 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Monkhorst, K., Jonkers, I., Rentmeester, E., Grosveld, F. & Gribnau, J. X Inactivation counting and choice is a stochastic process: evidence for involvement of an X-linked activator. Cell 132, 410–421 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Spencer, R. J. et al. A boundary element between Tsix and Xist binds the chromatin insulator Ctcf and contributes to initiation of X chromosome inactivation. _Genetics_CrossRef (2011)
  18. Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603–613 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Splinter, E. et al. The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev. 25, 1371–1383 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Caron, H. et al. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 291, 1289–1292 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. Tsai, C.-L., Rowntree, R. K., Cohen, D. E. & Lee, J. T. Higher order chromatin structure at the X-inactivation center via looping DNA. Dev. Biol. 319, 416–425 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Heard, E. et al. Transgenic mice carrying an _Xist_-containing YAC. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 441–450 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Guttman, M. et al. Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458, 223–227 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  25. Khalil, A. M. et al. Many human large intergenic noncoding RNAs associate with chromatin-modifying complexes and affect gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11667–11672 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  26. Seidl, C. I. M., Stricker, S. H. & Barlow, D. P. The imprinted Air ncRNA is an atypical RNAPII transcript that evades splicing and escapes nuclear export. EMBO J. 25, 3565–3575 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Ruf, S. et al. Large-scale analysis of the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome with a transposon-associated sensor. Nature Genet. 43, 379–386 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Kikuta, H. et al. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 17, 545–555 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 10.1038/nature11082 (this issue)
  30. Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  31. Mercier, R. et al. The MatP/matS site-specific system organizes the terminus region of the E. coli chromosome into a macrodomain. Cell 135, 475–485 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Pollex and T. Forné for experimental help; the imaging facility PICTIBiSA@BDD for technical assistance, D. Gentien and C. Hego for microarray hybridizations. We thank K. Bernhard, F. Stewart and A. Smith for protocols and material for 2i culture and EpiSC differentiation. We are grateful to members of the E.H. laboratory for critical input. This work was funded by grants from the Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement Supérieur and the ARC (to E.P.N.); a HFSP Long term fellowship (LT000597/2010-L) (to E.G.S.). EU EpiGeneSys FP7 Network of Excellence no. 257082, the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale, ANR, ERC Advanced Investigator award no. 250367 and EU FP7 SYBOSS grant no. 242129 (to E.H.). N.B. was supported by BMBF (FORSYS) and EMBO (fellowship ASTF 307-2011). J.D., B.R.L. and N.L.v.B. were supported by NIH (R01 HG003143) and a W. M. Keck Foundation Distinguished Young Scholar Award.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bryan R. Lajoie, Edda G. Schulz and Luca Giorgetti: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris F-75248, France ,
    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Nicolas Servant, Tristan Piolot, Emmanuel Barillot & Edith Heard
  2. CNRS UMR3215, Paris F-75248, France ,
    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Tristan Piolot & Edith Heard
  3. INSERM U934, Paris F-75248, France ,
    Elphège P. Nora, Edda G. Schulz, Luca Giorgetti, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Tristan Piolot & Edith Heard
  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Programs in Systems Biology and Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605-0103, USA
    Bryan R. Lajoie, Nynke L. van Berkum & Job Dekker
  5. INSERM U900, Paris, F-75248 France ,
    Nicolas Servant & Emmanuel Barillot
  6. Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, F-77300 France ,
    Nicolas Servant & Emmanuel Barillot
  7. Institute of Pathology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, and Institute of Theoretical Biology Humboldt Universität, 10115 Berlin, Germany ,
    Johannes Meisig & Nils Blüthgen
  8. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, 94158-2517, California, USA
    John Sedat
  9. Department of Reproduction and Development, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
    Joost Gribnau

Authors

  1. Elphège P. Nora
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Bryan R. Lajoie
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Edda G. Schulz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Luca Giorgetti
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Ikuhiro Okamoto
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Nicolas Servant
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Tristan Piolot
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Nynke L. van Berkum
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Johannes Meisig
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. John Sedat
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Joost Gribnau
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Emmanuel Barillot
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Nils Blüthgen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Job Dekker
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Edith Heard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.P.N. performed and analysed 3C, 5C, (RT–)qPCR, immunofluorescence, RNA and DNA FISH. B.R.L. and N.L.v.B. helped in the design and/or the analysis of 3C and 5C. L.G. performed 3C, FISH and 5C analysis. E.G.S. generated the time-course transcriptomic data, which was analysed by J.M. and N.B.; I.O. performed FISH on pre-implantation embryos. J.G. donated the XTX mouse ESC line. N.S. and E.B. helped in the epigenomic and 5C analyses. J.S. and T.P. set up OMX microscopy and analysis and T.P. performed structured illumination microscopy and image analysis. The manuscript was written by E.P.N., J.D. and E.H. with contribution from E.G.S. and input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toJob Dekker or Edith Heard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nora, E., Lajoie, B., Schulz, E. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre.Nature 485, 381–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11049

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Genome organization revealed

The spatial organization of the genome is linked to biological function, and advances in genomic technologies are allowing the conformation of chromosomes to be assessed genome wide. Two groups present complementary papers on the subject. Bing Ren and colleagues use Hi-C, an adaption of the chromosome conformation capture (3C) technique, to investigate the three-dimensional organization of the human and mouse genomes in embryonic stem cells and terminally differentiated cell types. Large, megabase-sized chromatin interaction domains, termed topological domains, are found to be a pervasive and conserved feature of genome organization. Edith Heard and colleagues use chromosome conformation capture carbon-copy (5C) technology and high-resolution microscopy to obtain a high-resolution map of the chromosomal interactions over a large region of the mouse X chromosome, including the X-inactivation centre. A series of discrete topologically associating domains is revealed, as is a previously unknown long intergenic RNA with a potential regulatory role.

Associated content