Ab initio alpha–alpha scattering (original) (raw)

References

  1. Imbriani, G. et al. The 12C(α, γ )16O reaction rate and the evolution of stars in the mass range 0.8 ≤ M/_M_⊙ ≤ 25. Astrophys. J. 558, 903–915 (2001)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  2. Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R. D. & Woosley, S. E. Nucleosynthesis in massive stars with improved nuclear and stellar physics. Astrophys. J. 576, 323–348 (2002)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  3. Wiescher, M., Käppeler, F. & Langanke, K. Critical reactions in contemporary nuclear astrophysics. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 165–210 (2012)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  4. Nollett, K. M., Pieper, S. C., Wiringa, R. B., Carlson, J. & Hale, G. M. Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron-α scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022502 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Quaglioni, S. & Navrátil, P. Ab initio many-body calculations of _n_-3H, _n_-4He, _p_-3,4He, and _n_-10Be scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 092501 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Navrátil, P. & Quaglioni, S. Ab initio many-body calculations of the 3H(d, n)4He and 3He(d, p)4He fusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 042503 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Hagen, G. & Michel, N. Elastic proton scattering of medium mass nuclei from coupled-cluster theory. Phys. Rev. C 86, 021602(R) (2012)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Orlandini, G. et al. Coupling the Lorentz integral transform (LIT) and the coupled cluster (CC) methods: a way towards continuum spectra of “not-so-few-body” systems. Few-Body Syst. 55, 907–911 (2014)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  9. Woosley, S. E., Arnett, W. D. & Clayton, D. D. The explosive burning of oxygen and silicon. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 26, 231–312 (1973)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  10. Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Ab initio calculation of the Hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 192501 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lähde, T., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Structure and rotations of the Hoyle state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 252501 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Lähde, T. A. et al. Nuclear lattice simulations using symmetry-sign extrapolation. Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 92 (2015)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  13. Rupak, G. & Lee, D. Radiative capture reactions in lattice effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 032502 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Pine, M., Lee, D. & Rupak, G. Adiabatic projection method for scattering and reactions on the lattice. Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 151 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Elhatisari, S. & Lee, D. Fermion-dimer scattering using an impurity lattice Monte Carlo approach and the adiabatic projection method. Phys. Rev. C 90, 064001 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Rupak, G. & Ravi, P. Proton–proton fusion in lattice effective field theory. Phys. Lett. B 741, 301–304 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS MATH Google Scholar
  17. Rokash, A. et al. Scattering cluster wave functions on the lattice using the adiabatic projection method. Phys. Rev. C 92, 054612 (2015)
  18. Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, U.-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773–1825 (2009)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  19. Heydenburg, N. P. & Temmer, G. M. Alpha-alpha scattering at low energies. Phys. Rev. 104, 123–134 (1956)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  20. Nilson, R., Jentschke, W. K., Briggs, G. R., Kerman, R. O. & Snyder, J. N. Investigation of excited states in Be8 by alpha-particle scattering from He. Phys. Rev. 109, 850–860 (1958)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  21. Tombrello, T. A. & Senhouse, L. S. Elastic scattering of alpha particles from helium. Phys. Rev. 129, 2252–2258 (1963)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  22. Afzal, S. A., Ahmad, A. A. Z. & Ali, S. Systematic survey of the α_–_α interaction. Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 247–273 (1969)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  23. Lu, B.-N., Lähde, T. A., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Precise determination of lattice phase shifts and mixing angles. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05652 (2015)
  24. Lee, D. Lattice simulations for few- and many-body systems. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63, 117–154 (2009)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  25. Borasoy, B., Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Two-particle scattering on the lattice: phase shifts, spin-orbit coupling, and mixing angles. Eur. Phys. J. A 34, 185–196 (2007)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  26. Higa, R., Hammer, H.-W. & van Kolck, U. αα scattering in halo effective field theory. Nucl. Phys. A 809, 171–188 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  27. Chen, J.-W., Lee, D. & Schaefer, T. Inequalities for light nuclei in the Wigner symmetry limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 242302 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Avila, M. L. et al. Constraining the 6.05 MeV 0+ and 6.13 MeV 3− cascade transitions in the 12C(α, γ)16O reaction using the asymptotic normalization coefficients. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 071101 (2015)
    Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Schürmann, D., Gialanella, L., Kunz, R. & Strieder, F. The astrophysical S factor of 12C(α, γ)16O at stellar energy. Phys. Lett. B 711, 35–40 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, X., Nollett, K. M. & Phillips, D. R. Combining ab initio calculations and low-energy effective field theory for halo nuclear systems: the case of 7Be + p → 8B + γ. Phys. Rev. C 89, 051602(R) (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  31. Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Lattice calculations for A = 3, 4, 6, 12 nuclei using chiral effective field theory. Eur. Phys. J. A 45, 335–352 (2010)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  32. Hubbard, J. Calculation of partition functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 77–78 (1959)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  33. Stratonovich, R. L. On a method of calculating quantum distribution functions. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 2, 416–419 (1958)
    ADS MATH Google Scholar
  34. Koonin, S. E. Auxiliary-field Monte Carlo methods. J. Stat. Phys. 43, 985–990 (1986)
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  35. Lee, D. Spectral convexity for attractive SU(2_N_) fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 182501 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Wigner, E. On the consequences of the symmetry of the nuclear hamiltonian on the spectroscopy of nuclei. Phys. Rev. 51, 106–119 (1937)
    Article CAS ADS MATH Google Scholar
  37. Mehen, T., Stewart, I. W. & Wise, M. B. Wigner symmetry in the limit of large scattering lengths. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 931–934 (1999)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, D. B. & Savage, M. J. The spin-flavor dependence of nuclear forces from large-N QCD. Phys. Lett. B 365, 244–251 (1996)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  39. Calle Cordón, A. & Ruiz Arriola, E. Wigner symmetry, large N c and renormalized one-boson exchange potential. Phys. Rev. C 78, 054002 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  40. Beane, S. et al. Nucleon-nucleon scattering parameters in the limit of SU(3) flavor symmetry. Phys. Rev. C 88, 024003 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  41. Beane, S. R. et al. Ab initio calculation of the np radiative capture process. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 132001 (2015)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Scalettar, R. T., Scalapino, D. J. & Sugar, R. L. New algorithm for the numerical simulation of fermions. Phys. Rev. B 34, 7911–7917 (1986)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  43. Gottlieb, S., Liu, W., Toussaint, D., Renken, R. L. & Sugar, R. L. Hybrid molecular dynamics algorithms for the numerical simulation of quantum chromodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 35, 2531–2542 (1987)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  44. Duane, S., Kennedy, A. D., Pendleton, B. J. & Roweth, D. Hybrid Monte Carlo. Phys. Lett. B 195, 216–222 (1987)
    Article CAS ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  45. Carlson, J., Pandharipande, V. & Wiringa, R. Variational calculations of resonant states in 4He. Nucl. Phys. A 424, 47–59 (1984)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  46. Kong, X. & Ravndal, F. Coulomb effects in low-energy proton proton scattering. Nucl. Phys. A 665, 137–163 (2000)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  47. Rupak, G. & Kong, X.-w. Quartet _S_-wave p_–_d scattering in EFT. Nucl. Phys. A 717, 73–90 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  48. Bethe, H. A. Theory of the effective range in nuclear scattering. Phys. Rev. 76, 38–50 (1949)
    Article CAS ADS MATH Google Scholar
  49. Jackson, J. D. & Blatt, J. M. The interpretation of low energy proton-proton scattering. Rev. Mod. Phys. 22, 77–118 (1950)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  50. König, S., Lee, D. & Hammer, H.-W. Causality constraints for charged particles. J. Phys. G 40, 045106 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  51. Tilley, D. R. et al. Energy levels of light nuclei A = 8, 9, 10. Nucl. Phys. A 745, 155–362 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  52. Hoop, B., Hale, G. M. & Navratil, P. Neutron-4He resonant scattering at d-3H threshold. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0985 (2011)
  53. Orlov, Yu. V., Irgaziev, B. F. & Nikitina, L. I. Asymptotic normalization coefficients of resonant and bound states from the phase shifts for αα and _α_12C scattering. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.07538 (2015)
  54. Hupin, G., Quaglioni, S. & Navrátil, P. Predictive theory for elastic scattering and recoil of protons from 4He. Phys. Rev. C 90, 061601(R) (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  55. Page, P. R. & Hale, G. M. 8Be nuclear data evaluation. AIP Conf. Proc. 769, 390–393 (2005)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  56. Gazit, D., Quaglioni, S. & Navrátil, P. Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 102502 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Klein, N., Lee, D., Liu, W. & Meißner, U.-G. Regularization methods for nuclear lattice effective field theory. Phys. Lett. B 747, 511–516 (2015)
    Article CAS ADS MATH Google Scholar
  58. Lu, B.-N., Lähde, T. A., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Breaking and restoration of rotational symmetry on the lattice for bound state multiplets. Phys. Rev. D 90, 034507 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  59. Lu, B.-N., Lähde, T. A., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Breaking and restoration of rotational symmetry for irreducible tensor operators on the lattice. Phys. Rev. D 92, 014506 (2015)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  60. Yamazaki, T., Ishikawa, K.-i., Kuramashi, Y. & Ukawa, A. Helium nuclei, deuteron and dineutron in 2 + 1 flavor lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 86, 074514 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  61. Berkowitz, E. et al. Two-nucleon higher partial-wave scattering from lattice QCD. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.00886 (2015)
  62. Chang, E. et al. The magnetic structure of light nuclei from lattice QCD. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05518 (2015)
  63. Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Lattice effective field theory calculations for A = 3, 4, 6, 12 nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 142501 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Lähde, T. A. et al. Lattice effective field theory for medium-mass nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 732, 110–115 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  65. Epelbaum, E., Krebs, H., Lee, D. & Meißner, U.-G. Ground state energy of dilute neutron matter at next-to-leading order in lattice chiral effective field theory. Eur. Phys. J. A 40, 199–213 (2009)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  66. Wlazłowski, G., Holt, J. W., Moroz, S., Bulgac, A. & Roche, K. J. Auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo simulations of neutron matter in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 182503 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Rupak, G. & Higa, R. Model-independent calculation of radiative neutron capture on lithium-7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 222501 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Acharya, B. & Phillips, D. R. 19Carbon in halo EFT: effective-range parameters from Coulomb-dissociation experiments. Nucl. Phys. A 913, 103–115 (2013)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  69. Ji, C., Elster, C. & Phillips, D. R. 6He nucleus in halo effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C 90, 044004 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  70. Ryberg, E., Forssén, C., Hammer, H.-W. & Platter, L. Constraining low-energy proton capture on beryllium-7 through charge radius measurements. Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 170 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references