Exploring the quantum speed limit with computer games (original) (raw)

• McLeod, P. & Dienes, Z. Do fielders know where to go to catch the ball or only how to get there? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22, 531–543 (1996)
  Article Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. & Todd, P. in Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (eds Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. & The ABC Research Group) 3–34 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999)
• Cooper, S. et al. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 756–760 (2010)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Lee, J. et al. RNA design rules from a massive open laboratory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2122–2127 (2014)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S. et al. Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 509, 331–336 (2014)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Weitenberg, C., Kuhr, S., Mølmer, K. & Sherson, J. Quantum computation architecture using optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. A 84, 032322 (2011)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Mandelstam, L. & Tamm, I. The uncertainty relation between energy and time in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. J. Phys. 9, 249–254 (1945)
  MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Caneva, T., Calarco, T., Fazio, R., Santoro, G. E. & Montangero, S. Speeding up critical system dynamics through optimized evolution. Phys. Rev. A 84, 012312 (2011)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Gajdacz, M., Das, K. K., Arlt, J., Sherson, J. F. & Opatrný, T. Time limited optimal dynamics beyond the quantum speed limit. Phys. Rev. A 92, 062106 (2015)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Monroe, C. Quantum information processing with atoms and photons. Nature 416, 238–246 (2002)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, M. et al. Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond. Adv. Phys. 56, 243–379 (2007)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J. & Nemoto, K. Quantum error correction for beginners. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 076001 (2013)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Rabitz, H., Hsieh, M. M. & Rosenthal, C. M. Quantum optimally controlled transition landscapes. Science 303, 1998–2001 (2004)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Sklarz, S. & Tannor, D. Loading a Bose-Einstein condensate onto an optical lattice: an application of optimal control theory to the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Phys. Rev. A 66, 053619 (2002)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Ugray, Z. et al. Scatter search and local NLP solvers: a multistart framework for global optimization. Inf. J. Comp. 19, 328–340 (2007)
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Caneva, T. et al. Optimal control at the quantum speed limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 240501 (2009)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Bilalić, M., Langner, R., Erb, M. & Grodd, W. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139, 728–742 (2010)
  Article Google Scholar
• Lintott, C. et al. Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900,000 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 410, 166–178 (2011)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Bakr, W. S. et al. Probing the superfluid-to-Mott insulator transition at the single-atom level. Science 329, 547–550 (2010)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Sherson, J. F. et al. Single-atom-resolved fluorescence imaging of an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 467, 68–72 (2010)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Weitenberg, C. et al. Single-spin addressing in an atomic Mott insulator. Nature 471, 319–324 (2011)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. et al. Entangling two transportable neutral atoms via local spin exchange. Nature 527, 208–211 (2015)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• De Chiara, G. et al. Optimal control of atom transport for quantum gates in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052333 (2008)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Jäger, G., Reich, D. M., Goerz, M. H., Koch, C. P. & Hohenester, U. Optimal quantum control of Bose–Einstein condensates in magnetic microtraps: comparison of gradient-ascent-pulse-engineering and Krotov optimization schemes. Phys. Rev. A 90, 033628 (2014)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Doria, P., Calarco, T. & Montangero, S. Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190501 (2011)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Caneva, T., Calarco, T. & Montangero, S. Chopped random-basis quantum optimization. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Zahedinejad, E., Schirmer, S. & Sanders, B. C. Evolutionary algorithms for hard quantum control. Phys. Rev. A 90, 032310 (2014)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Roslund, J. & Rabitz, H. Experimental quantum control landscapes: inherent monotonicity and artificial structure. Phys. Rev. A 80, 013408 (2009)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Vuculescu, O. & Bergenholtz, C. How to solve problems with crowds: a computer-based simulation model. Creativity Innov. Manage. 23, 121–136 (2014)
  Article Google Scholar
• Lieberoth, A. et al. Getting humans to do quantum optimization—user acquisition, engagement and early results from the citizen cyberscience game Quantum Moves. Human Comput. 1, 221–246 (2014)
  Article Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H. & Franzoni, C. Crowd science user contribution patterns and their implications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 679–684 (2015)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Calarco, T., Dorner, U., Julienne, P., Williams, C. & Zoller, P. Quantum computations with atoms in optical lattices: marker qubits and molecular interactions. Phys. Rev. A 70, 012306 (2004)
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Anderlini, M. et al. Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448, 452–456 (2007)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, N. B., Bason, M. G. & Sherson, J. F. One- and two-qubit quantum gates using superimposed optical-lattice potentials. Phys. Rev. A 89, 032306 (2014)
  Article ADS Google Scholar