The evolving landscape of plant varietal rights in the United States, 1930–2008 (original) (raw)

Nature Biotechnology volume 31, pages 25–29 (2013) Cite this article

Subjects

The types of plants being protected, by whom and by what form of varietal right, has changed markedly since the United States first enabled intellectual property protection for plant varieties in 1930.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: US varietal rights, 1930–2008.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Changing distribution of varietal rights by crop.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: Changing composition of applicant pool, 1930–2008.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 4: Increasing concentration of varietal rights applications, 1930–2008.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

References

  1. Newman, M.R. USDA Agr. Lib. Notes 6, 35–42 (1931).
    Google Scholar
  2. (7 U.S.C. 2543 (d–e)).
  3. (7 U.S.C. 2541).
  4. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303,309 (1980).
  5. J.E.M. Ag Supply v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l. 534 U.S. 124 (2001).
  6. Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser [2004] 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004 SCC 34.
  7. Louwaars, N.P. et al. Impacts of strengthened intellectual property rights regimes on the plant breeding industry in developing countries: a synthesis of five case studies (Wageningen, UR, 2005).
  8. Kimbrell, A. Fatal Harvest: The Tragedy of Industrial Agriculture (Island Press, 2002).
    Google Scholar
  9. ETC Group. Communiqué 100 (2008).
  10. Tansey, G. Food security, biotechnology and intellectual property: unpacking some issues around TRIPS (Quaker United Nations Office, 2002).
  11. Alston, J.M. & Venner, R.J. Res. Pol. 31, 527–542 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Heald, P.J. & Chapman, S. Veggie tales: Pernicious myths about patents, innovation, and crop diversity in the twentieth century. Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Paper No. LBSS11-34; Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 11-03. (2011). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1928920
  13. Marco, A.C. & Rausser, G.C. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 90, 133–151 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Jerardo, A. Floriculture and nursery crops yearbook (USDA, ERS, 2007).
  15. Fernandez-Cornejo, J. Bulletin 786 (USDA, ERS, 2004)
    Google Scholar
  16. Jones, C.A., El-Osta, H. & Green, R. Econ. Brief 7 (USDA, ERS, 2006).
    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are especially appreciative of research assistance from C. Pratt, S. Pardey, M. Hallaway and C. Chan-Kang, and for the excellent assistance with data queries from personnel at the US Patent and Trademark Office and USDA's Plant Variety Protection Office. The research for this paper was supported by the International Science and Technology Policy (InSTePP) center at the University of Minnesota, the University of Waterloo, the US National Institutes of Health and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, by way of the HarvestChoice project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philip Pardey and Jennifer Drew are in the Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.,
    Philip Pardey & Jennifer Drew
  2. Bonwoo Koo is in the Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.,
    Bonwoo Koo
  3. Jeffrey Horwich is a host of Marketplace from American Public Media, Los Angeles, California, USA.,
    Jeffrey Horwich
  4. Carol Nottenburg is at Cougar Patent Law, Renton, Washington, USA.,
    Carol Nottenburg

Authors

  1. Philip Pardey
  2. Bonwoo Koo
  3. Jennifer Drew
  4. Jeffrey Horwich
  5. Carol Nottenburg

Corresponding author

Correspondence toPhilip Pardey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pardey, P., Koo, B., Drew, J. et al. The evolving landscape of plant varietal rights in the United States, 1930–2008.Nat Biotechnol 31, 25–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2467

Download citation

This article is cited by