Replacing cRNA targets with cDNA reduces microarray cross-hybridization (original) (raw)

Nature Biotechnology volume 24, pages 1071–1073 (2006)Cite this article

To the editor:

Gene-expression microarrays are designed to measure relative concentrations of transcripts through the specific hybridization of an immobilized DNA probe to its complementary target. This technology is viable to the extent that a single, rather permissive hybridization condition allows most probes to bind specifically to their targets. Despite efforts to maximize stringency, a significant hybridization signal can still be detected on various oligonucleotide-based platforms, even when there are a few mismatches between probe and target1,2,3. Furthermore, several groups have detected widespread cross-hybridization in microarray measurements4,5, and on the order of 10% of the probes on a common oligonucleotide array platform were predicted to be susceptible to cross-hybridization5. Efforts to optimize probe length found that longer probes enjoy stronger signal intensity but also suffer from increased propensity toward cross-hybridization6. Therefore, nonspecific binding remains a significant source of measurement error and may be the reason why quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR fails to confirm about 10–20% of difference calls made by microarray analysis (reviewed in ref. 7). Here, we report that a high-level of promiscuity in DNA-RNA hybridization underlies widespread cross-hybridization in microarrays. This cross-hybridization can be reduced using cDNA targets in place of cRNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Comparison of microarray data from Jurkat-cell RNA with and without spiked transcripts.

References

  1. Ramakrishnan, R. et al. Nucleic Acids Res 30, e30 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Chudin, E. et al. Genome Biol 3, RESEARCH0005 (2002).
  3. Hughes, T.R. et al. Nat Biotechnol 19, 342–347 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Zhang, J., Finney, R.P., Clifford, R.J., Derr, L.K. & Buetow, K.H. Genomics 85, 297–308 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Wu, C., Carta, R. & Zhang, L. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e84 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Relogio, A., Schwager, C., Richter, A., Ansorge, W. & Valcarcel, J. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e51 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Eklund, A.C. & Szallasi, Z. Trends Genet. 22, 101–109 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Lockhart, D.J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 1675–1680 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R.W. & Brown, P.O. Science 270, 467–470 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Sugimoto, N., Nakano, M. & Nakano, S. Biochemistry 39, 11270–11281 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Allawi, H.T. & SantaLucia, J., Jr. Biochemistry 37, 2170–2179 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Allawi, H.T. & SantaLucia, J., Jr. Biochemistry 37, 9435–9444 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Sekar, M.M., Bloch, W. & St John, P.M. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 366–375 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Kurn, N. et al. Clin. Chem. 51, 1973–1981 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Dafforn, A. et al. Biotechniques 37, 854–857 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Barker, C.S. et al. BMC Genomics 6, 57 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, J.M., Edwards, S., Shoemaker, D. & Schadt, E.E. Trends Genet. 21, 93–102 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Kampa, D. et al. Genome Res. 14, 331–342 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Matzke, M.A. & Birchler, J.A. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 24–35 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Children's Hospital Informatics Program at the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (CHIP@HST), Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA
    Aron C Eklund & Zoltan Szallasi
  2. Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 65 Landsdowne St., Cambridge, 02139, Massachusetts, USA
    Aron C Eklund
  3. NuGEN Technologies, Inc., 821 Industrial Rd, Unit A, San Carlos, 94070, California, USA
    Leah R Turner, Pengchin Chen, Gianfranco deFeo & Anne R Kopf-Sill
  4. Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, 02125, Massachusetts, USA
    Roderick V Jensen

Authors

  1. Aron C Eklund
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Leah R Turner
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Pengchin Chen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Roderick V Jensen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Gianfranco deFeo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Anne R Kopf-Sill
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Zoltan Szallasi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eklund, A., Turner, L., Chen, P. et al. Replacing cRNA targets with cDNA reduces microarray cross-hybridization.Nat Biotechnol 24, 1071–1073 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0906-1071

Download citation

This article is cited by