Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes (original) (raw)

Nature Biotechnology volume 21, pages 673–678 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

We report on the development of molecular inversion probe (MIP) genotyping, an efficient technology for large-scale single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. This technique uses MIPs to produce inverted sequences, which undergo a unimolecular rearrangement and are then amplified by PCR using common primers and analyzed using universal sequence tag DNA microarrays, resulting in highly specific genotyping. With this technology, multiplex analysis of more than 1,000 probes in a single tube can be done using standard laboratory equipment. Genotypes are generated with a high call rate (95%) and high accuracy (>99%) as determined by independent sequencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patil, N. et al. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science 294, 1719–1723 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Syvanen, A.C. Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 930–942 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Nilsson, M. et al. Making ends meet in genetic analysis using padlock probes. Hum. Mutat. 19, 410–415 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Elnifro, E.M., Ashshi, A.M., Cooper, R.J. & Klapper, P.E. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13, 559–570 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Lockhart, D.J. et al. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 1675–1680 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R.W. & Brown, P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Lyamichev, V. et al. Polymorphism identification and quantitative detection of genomic DNA by invasive cleavage of oligonucleotide probes. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 292–296 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Eis, P.S. et al. An invasive cleavage assay for direct quantitation of specific RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 673–676 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Nilsson, M. et al. Padlock probes: circularizing oligonucleotides for localized DNA detection. Science 265, 2085–2088 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Lizardi, P.M. et al. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat. Genet. 19, 225–232 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Faruqi, A.F. et al. High-throughput genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms with rolling circle amplification. BMC Genomics 2, 4 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Antson, D.O., Isaksson, A., Landegren, U. & Nilsson, M. PCR-generated padlock probes detect single nucleotide variation in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, E58 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Shoemaker, D.D., Lashkari, D.A., Morris, D., Mittmann, M. & Davis, R.W. Quantitative phenotypic analysis of yeast deletion mutants using a highly parallel molecular bar-coding strategy. Nat. Genet. 14, 450–456 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Zhang, D.Y., Brandwein, M., Hsuih, T.C. & Li, H. Amplification of target-specific, ligation-dependent circular probe. Gene 211, 277–285 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Abravaya, K., Carrino, J.J., Muldoon, S. & Lee, H.H. Detection of point mutations with a modified ligase chain reaction (Gap-LCR). Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 675–682 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Banér, J., Nilsson, M., Mendel-Hartvig, M. & Landegren, U. Signal amplification of padlock probes by rolling circle replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5073–5078 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Gharavi, A.G. et al. IgA nephropathy, the most common cause of glomerulonephritis, is linked to 6q22-23. Nat. Genet. 26, 354–357 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Fakhrai-Rad, H., Pourmand, N. & Ronaghi, M. Pyrosequencing: an accurate detection platform for single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum. Mutat. 19, 479–485 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Ronaghi, M. Pyrosequencing sheds light on DNA sequencing Genome Res. 11, 3–11 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Fan, J.B. et al. Parallel genotyping of human SNPs using generic high-density oligonucleotide tag arrays. Genome Res. 10, 853–860 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Landegren, U., Kaiser, R., Sanders, J. & Hood, L. A ligase-mediated gene detection technique. Science 241, 1077–1080 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Tran, T. Brundage, J. Patterson, E. Prakash and C. Bruckner for technical assistance and T. Jones and P. Oefner for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NIH HG00205. The work in Uppsala was supported by the Beijer and Wallenberg Foundations, the Research Councils of Sweden for natural science and for medicine, the Swedish Cancer Fund and Polysaccharide Research AB (Uppsala).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Paul Hardenbol, Maneesh Jain, Eugeni A Namsaraev, George A Karlin-Neumann, Hossein Fakhrai-Rad & Thomas D Willis
    Present address: ParAllele BioScience, 384 Oyster Point Blvd Suite 8, S., San Francisco, California, 94080, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, 855 California Avenue, Palo Alto, 94304, California, USA
    Paul Hardenbol, Maneesh Jain, Eugeni A Namsaraev, George A Karlin-Neumann, Hossein Fakhrai-Rad, Mostafa Ronaghi, Thomas D Willis & Ronald W Davis
  2. Department of Genetics and Pathology, The Beijer Laboratory, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala, Se-751 85, Sweden
    Johan Banér, Mats Nilsson & Ulf Landegren

Authors

  1. Paul Hardenbol
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Johan Banér
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Maneesh Jain
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Mats Nilsson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Eugeni A Namsaraev
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. George A Karlin-Neumann
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Hossein Fakhrai-Rad
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Mostafa Ronaghi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Thomas D Willis
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Ulf Landegren
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Ronald W Davis
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMostafa Ronaghi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.H., M.J., E.A.N., G.A.K.-N., H. F.-R. and T.D.W. are currently employed by ParAllele Bioscience (South San Francisco, California), a company that is commercializing the Molecular Inversion Probe Assay. M.R., U.L. and R.W.D. are shareholders of ParAllele Bioscience. J.B. and M.N. have no association with the company.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardenbol, P., Banér, J., Jain, M. et al. Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes.Nat Biotechnol 21, 673–678 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt821

Download citation

This article is cited by