Quantifying future climate change (original) (raw)

References

1. Pall, P. et al. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470, 382–385 (2011).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
2. Challinor, A. J., Simelton, E. S., Fraser, E. D. G., Hemming, D. & Collins, M. Increased crop failure due to climate change: Assessing adaptation options using models and socio-economic data for wheat in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748–9326/5/3/034012 (2010).
3. Murphy, J. M. et al. Climate Change Projections UKCP09 (Defra, 2009).
   Google Scholar
4. Meehl, G. A. et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset — A new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1383–1394 (2007).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Knutti, R. et al. IPCC Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, 2010).
   Google Scholar
6. Tebaldi, C. & Knutti, R. The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 2053–2075 (2007).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. Reliability of the CMIP3 ensemble. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L02703 (2010).
   Article Google Scholar
8. Yokohata, T. et al. Reliability of multi-model and structurally different single-model ensembles. Clim. Dynam. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1203-1 (2011).
9. Chandler, R. E. Exploiting Strength, Discounting Weakness: Combining Information from Multiple Climate Simulators Research Report No. 311 (Department of Statistical Science, Univ. College London, 2011); available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/statistics/research/reports.
   Google Scholar
10. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1107 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim. Dynam. 37, 407–418 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Gregory, J., Stouffer, R., Raper, S., Stott, P. & Rayner, N. An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J. Clim. 15, 3117–3121 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Roe, G. & Baker, M. Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318, 629–632 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Roe, G. & Armour, K. How sensitive is climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L14708 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Armour, K. & Roe, G. Climate commitment in an uncertain world. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L01707 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Annan, J. D. & Hargreaves, J. C. On the generation and interpretation of probabilistic estimates of climate sensitivity. Climatic Change 104, 423–436 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Hannart, A., Dufresne, J. & Naveau, P. Why climate sensitivity may not be so unpredictable. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L16707 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Zaliapin, I. & Ghil, M. Another look at climate sensitivity. Nonlinear Proc. Geophys. 17, 113–122 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Frame, D. et al. Constraining climate forecasts: The role of prior assumptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L022241 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Gregory, J. & Forster, P. Transient climate response estimated from radiative forcing and observed temperature change. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D23105 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Hegerl, G., Crowley, T., Hyde, W. & Frame, D. Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries. Nature 440, 1029–1032 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
22. Schneider von Deimling, T., Held, H., Ganopolski, A. & Rahmstorf, S. Climate sensitivity estimated from ensemble simulations of glacial climate. Clim. Dynam. 27, 149–163 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Edwards, T., Crucifix, M. & Harrison, S. Using the past to constrain the future: how the palaeorecord can improve estimates of global warming. Prog. Phys. Geog. 31, 481–500 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Harris, G. R. et al. Frequency distributions of transient regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles of general circulation model simulations. Clim. Dynam. 27, 357–375 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Stott, P. A., Kettleborough, J. A. & Allen, M. R. Uncertainty in continental-scale temperature predictions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L02708 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
26. Stott, P. A. & Kettleborough, J. Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise. Nature 416, 723–726 (2002); erratum ibid 417, 205 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
27. Stott, P. A. et al. Observational constraints on past attributable warming and predictions of future global warming. J. Clim. 19, 3055–3069 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Boe, J., Hall, A. & Qu, X. September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100. Nature Geosci. 2, 341–343 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
29. Hall, A. & Qu, X. Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L03502 (2006).
    Google Scholar
30. Collins, M. et al. Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles. Clim. Dynam. 36, 1737–1766 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Collins, M. et al. Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change. Clim. Dynam. 27, 127–147 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
32. Murphy, J. M. et al. Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430, 768–772 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
33. Stainforth, D. et al. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433, 403–406 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
34. Brierley, C. M., Collins, M. & Thorpe, A. J. The impact of perturbations to ocean-model parameters on climate and climate change in a coupled model. Clim. Dynam. 34, 325–343 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Rougier, J. Probabilistic inference for future climate using an ensemble of climate model evaluations. Climatic Change 81, 247–264 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Murphy, J. M. et al. A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 1993–2028 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
37. Sexton, D., Murphy, J., Collins, M. & Webb, M. Multivariate predictions using imperfect climate models: Part 1 outline of methodology. Clim. Dynam. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1208-9 (2011).
38. Rougier, J., Sexton, D. M. H., Murphy, J. M. & Stainforth, D. Analyzing the climate sensitivity of the HadSM3 climate model using ensembles from different but related experiments. J. Clim. 22, 3540–3557 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
39. Harris, G. R., Collins, M., Sexton, D. M. H., Murphy, J. M. & Booth, B. B. B. Probabilistic projections for 21st century European climate. Nat. Hazard. Earth Sys. 10, 2009–2020 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
40. Knutti, R., Furrer, R., Tebaldi, C., Cermak, J. & Meehl, G. Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J. Clim. 23, 2739–2758 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Philip, S. & van Oldenborgh, G. Atmospheric properties of ENSO: Models versus observations. Clim. Dynam. 34, 1073–1091 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
42. Philip, S., Collins, M., van Oldenborgh, G. & van den Hurk, B. The role of atmosphere and ocean physical processes in ENSO in a perturbed physics coupled climate model. Ocean Sci. 6, 441–459 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Huntingford, C. & Cox, P. An analogue model to derive additional climate change scenarios from existing GCM simulations. Clim. Dynam. 16, 575–586 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
44. Hegerl, G. C. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 663–745 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
    Google Scholar

Download references