Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project (original) (raw)

References

  1. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty Science Policy Centre Report 10/09 (The Royal Society, 2009). Key first review of geoengineering proposals, their possible risks and uncertainties.
  2. Vaughan, N. E. & Lenton, T. M. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Climatic Change 109, 749–790 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9949–9954 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research (The Royal Society, 2011).
  5. Rayner, S. et al. The Oxford principles. Climatic Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2 (2013). First proposals for a governance framework for geoengineering research (now widely known as the 'Oxford Principles').
    Google Scholar
  6. Climate Engineering: Technical Status, Future Directions and Potential Responses Report GAO 11–71 (US Government Accountability Office, 2011).
  7. Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer, 1995).
    Book Google Scholar
  8. Dietz, T. & Stern, P. (eds) Public Participation in Environmental Risk Assessment and Decision-Making (National Academies, 2008).
    Google Scholar
  9. Fiorino, D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 15, 226–243 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Rogers-Hayden, T. & Pidgeon, N. F. Moving engagement 'upstream'? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering inquiry. Public Underst. Sci. 16, 346–364 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Marris, C. Public views on GMOs: Deconstructing the myths. EMBO Rep. 21, 545–548 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Pidgeon, N. F., Harthorn, B., Bryant, K. & Rogers-Hayden, T. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nature Nanotech. 4, 95–98 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Burri, R. V. Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland. Public Underst. Sci. 18, 498–511 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Bhattachary, D., Calitz, J. P. & Hunter, A. Synthetic Biology Dialogue(BBSRC, 2010).
    Google Scholar
  15. Stirling, A. Deliberate futures: Precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology. Sustain. Dev. 15, 286–295 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Pidgeon, N. F., Hood, C., Jones, D. K., Turner, B. A. & Gibson, R. in Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management 89–134 (The Royal Society, 1992).
    Google Scholar
  17. Renn, O. in The Social Amplification of Risk (eds Pidgeon, N. F., Kasperson, R. K. & Slovic, P.) 374–401 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).
    Book Google Scholar
  18. Experiment Earth: Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering (NERC, 2010); available at www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final-report.pdf.
  19. Jasanoff, S. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41, 223–244 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Rip, A., Misa, T. J. & Schot, J. Managing Technology in Society: The Case of Constructive Technology Assessment (Pinter, 1995).
    Google Scholar
  21. Guston, D. H. & Sarewitz, D. Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Soc. 24, 93–109 (2002). Philosophical discussion of the framework for and purposes of responsible innovation approaches.
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Owen, R. & Goldberg, N. Responsible innovation: A pilot study with the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Anal. 30, 1699–1707 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/hose-experiment/spice-opposition-letter/
  24. Corner, A. & Pidgeon. N. F. Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications. Environ: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 52, 24–37 (2010). Summarizes some of the ethical dimensions to geoengineering proposals and elaborates the case for early (upstream) public engagement.
    Google Scholar
  25. Gardiner, S. M. Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: A commentary on the values of the Royal Society report. Environ. Value. 20, 163–188 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Macnaghten, P. & Owen, R. Good governance for geoengineering. Nature 479, 293 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Corner, A. Pidgeon, N. & Parkhill, K. Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of 'upstream' engagement. WIREs Clim. Change 3, 451–466 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Chilvers, J. Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting upon the Field of Public Dialogue on Science and Technology (Univ. East Anglia & Sciencewise, 2010).
    Google Scholar
  29. Irwin, A. & Wynne, B. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
    Book Google Scholar
  30. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barthe, Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (MIT Press, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  31. Pidgeon, N. F. et al. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4176–4196 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Buck, H. J. Geoengineering: Remaking climate for profit or humanitarian intervention? Dev. Change 43, 253–270 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Macnaghten, P. Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: Narrative structures, public responses, and emerging nanotechnologies. Environ. Plann. A 42, 23–37 (2010). Reviews the broad lessons learned from social scientists' study of public dialogue around earlier emerging technologies, many of which are likely to apply to SRM proposals.
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Turner, B. A. & Pidgeon, N. F. Man-made Disasters 2nd edn (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  35. Harremoës, P. et al. (eds) Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1869–2000 Copenhagen (European Environment Agency, 2001).
    Google Scholar
  36. Hamilton, C. The Ethical Foundations of Climate Engineering (Australian National Univ., 2011).
    Google Scholar
  37. Parkhill, K. & Pidgeon, N. F. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops Understanding Risk Working Paper 11–01 (Cardiff Univ. School of Psychology, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  38. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W. & Simmons, P. Re-framing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Underst. Sci. 17, 145–169 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Nielsen, A. P., Lassen, J. & Sandoe, P. Democracy at its best? The consensus conference in a cross-national perspective. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic. 20, 13–35 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Dryzek, J. S. & Tucker, A. Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States. Public Admin. Rev. 68, 864–876 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Philbrick, M. & Barandarian, J. The National Citizens' Technology Forum: Lessons for the future. Sci. Public Policy 35, 335–347 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Cobb, M. D. Creating informed public opinion: Citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 1533–1548 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Chilvers, J. & Macnaghten, P. The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns, Governance and Institutional Response (Univ. East Anglia, Univ. Durham & Sciencewise, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  44. Wynne, B. Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Sci. Technol. Soc. 1, 99–110 10.1215/s12280-007-9004-7(2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Lezaun, J. & Soneryd, L. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Underst. Sci. 16, 279–297 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Brown, J. & Isaccs, D. The World Café: Shaping our Future through Conversations that Matter (Berrett-Koehler, 2005).
    Google Scholar
  47. Pidgeon, N. F. & Henwood, K. L. in Handbook of Data Analysis (eds Hardy, M. & Bryman, A.) 625–648 (Sage, 2004).
    Book Google Scholar
  48. Pidgeon, N. F. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Clim. Change 1, 35–41 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references