Attributing the increase in atmospheric CO2 to emitters and absorbers (original) (raw)

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 926–930 (2013) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Climate change policies need to consider the contribution of each emitting region to the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. We calculate regional attributions of increased atmospheric CO2 using two different assumptions about land sinks. In the first approach, each absorber region is attributed ‘domestic sinks’ that occur within its boundaries. In the second, alternative approach, each emitter region is attributed ‘foreign sinks’ that it created indirectly through its contribution to increasing CO2. We unambiguously attribute the largest share of the historical increase in CO2 between pre-industrial times and the present-day period to developed countries. However, the excess CO2 in the atmosphere since pre-industrial times attributed to developing countries is greater than their share of cumulative CO2 emissions. This is because a greater fraction of their emissions occurred more recently. If emissions remain high over the coming decades, the share of excess CO2 attributable to developing countries will grow, and the sink service provided by forested regions—in particular those with tropical forest—to other regions will depend critically on future tropical land-use change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Attribution of the atmospheric CO2 increase between 1850 and 2100, assuming that the carbon cycle was in equilibrium in 1850.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Changes in global annual CO2 sources and sinks between 1850 and 2100.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Le Quéré, C. et al. The global carbon budget 1959–2012. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 5, 1107–1157 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007 FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1 (UNFCCC, 2008); available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf#page=8.
  3. Steffen, W. et al. The terrestrial carbon cycle: Implications for the Kyoto protocol. Science 280, 1393–1394 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (United Nations, 1998); available at http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/ccc/ccc.html.
  5. Schulze, E-D., Valentini, R. & Sanz, M-J. The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: Implications of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 505–518 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Takahashi, T. et al. Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean p CO 2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans. Deep-Sea Res. II 56, 554–577 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Denman, K. L. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) 499–587 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
    Google Scholar
  8. Trudinger, C. & Enting, I. Comparison of formalisms for attributing responsibility for climate change: Non-linearities in the Brazilian Proposal approach. Climatic Change 68, 67–99 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Den Elzen, M. et al. Analysing countries’ contribution to climate change: Scientific and policy-related choices. Environ. Sci. Policy 8, 614–636 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Höhne, N. et al. Contributions of individual countries’ emissions to climate change and their uncertainty. Climatic Change 106, 359–391 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Gitz, V. & Ciais, P. Amplifying effects of land-use change on future atmospheric CO2 levels. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 359–391 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Boden, T. A., Marland, G. & Andres, R. J. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (US Department of Energy, 2010).
    Book Google Scholar
  13. Norby, R. J. et al. Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18052–18056 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis; results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Cox, P. M., Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Spall, S. A. & Totterdell, I. J. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408, 184–187 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Le Quere, C. et al. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geosci. 2, 831–836 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. IPCC, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
  18. IMAGE team The IMAGE 2.2 Implementation of the SRES Scenarios; A Comprehensive Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change and Impacts in the 21st Century (RIVM, Bilthoven, 2001).
  19. Joos, F. et al. An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus 48(B), 397–417 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Ciais, P. & Moore, B. Integrated Global Carbon Observation Theme: A Strategy to Realize a Coordinated System of Integrated Global Carbon Cycle Observations (2001).
  21. Crisp, D. et al. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) mission. Adv. Space Res. 34, 700–709 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Gitz, V. & Ciais, P. Future expansion of agriculture and pasture acts to amplify atmospheric CO2 levels in response to fossil-fuel and land-use change emissions. Climatic Change 67, 161–184 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Gitz, V. Usage Des Terres et Politiques Climatiques Globales PhD thesis (in French), Presses Académiques Francophones (2003).
  24. Gitz, V., Hourcade, J. C. & Ciais, P. The timing of biological carbon sequestration and carbon abatement in the energy sector under optimal strategies against climate risks. Energy J. 27, 113–133 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Friedlingstein, P. et al. On the contribution of CO2 fertilization to the missing biospheric sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 541–556 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Houghton, R. A. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B 378–390 (2003).
    Google Scholar
  27. Alcamo, J. et al. in Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century, Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model (eds Alcamo, J., Leemans, R. & Kreileman, E.) 97–139 (Elsevier, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  28. Houghton, R. A. Emissions of Carbon from Land-use Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997).
    Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a contribution to the efforts of the Global Carbon Project, a joint project of the IGBP, WCRP, IHDP and Diversitas, to track and analyse the interactions among the carbon cycle, human activities and the climate system.

Author information

Author notes

  1. P. Ciais and T. Gasser: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, CE l’Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
    P. Ciais, T. Gasser & J. D. Paris
  2. Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    P. Ciais & S. L. Piao
  3. Carnegie Institution Department of Global Ecology, 260 Panama Street, Stanford, California 94305, USA
    K. Caldeira
  4. Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
    M. R. Raupach & J. G. Canadell
  5. S J Mehta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, 400076 Mumbai, India
    A. Patwardhan
  6. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
    P. Friedlingstein
  7. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    S. L. Piao
  8. Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement, CNRS-CIRAD-ParisTech-EHESS 45 bis avenue de la Belle Gabrielle, 94736 Nogent Sur Marne, France
    V. Gitz

Authors

  1. P. Ciais
  2. T. Gasser
  3. J. D. Paris
  4. K. Caldeira
  5. M. R. Raupach
  6. J. G. Canadell
  7. A. Patwardhan
  8. P. Friedlingstein
  9. S. L. Piao
  10. V. Gitz

Contributions

P.C. designed the study and wrote the text. T.G. prepared the model set-up, conducted the simulations and contributed to the text. J.D.P. contributed to the model set-up and to the text, and made the key figures. K.C., M.R.R., J.G.C., A.P., P.F. and S.L.P. contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the text. V.G. developed the original OSCAR model and contributed to the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toP. Ciais.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ciais, P., Gasser, T., Paris, J. et al. Attributing the increase in atmospheric CO2 to emitters and absorbers.Nature Clim Change 3, 926–930 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1942

Download citation

This article is cited by