Air-pollution emission ranges consistent with the representative concentration pathways (original) (raw)

References

  1. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Van Vuuren, D. et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
  5. IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  6. Huber, M. & Knutti, R. Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth’s energy balance. Nature Geosci 5, 31–36 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Shindell, D. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Amann, M., Klimont, Z. & Wagner, F. Regional and global emissions of air pollutants: Recent trends and future scenarios. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 31–55 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Chuwah, C. et al. Implications of alternative assumptions regarding future air pollution control in scenarios similar to the representative concentration pathways. Atmos. Environ. 79, 787–801 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. McCollum, D. L., Krey, V. & Riahi, K. An integrated approach to energy sustainability. Nature Clim. Change 1, 428–429 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe. Energ. Policy 34, 444–460 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Bollen, J., Hers, S. & van der Zwaan, B. An integrated assessment of climate change, air pollution, and energy security policy. Energ. Policy 38, 4021–4030 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
  14. Riahi, K. et al. RCP 85—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 109, 33–57 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. McCollum, D. et al. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges. Climatic Change 119, 479–494 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Riahi, K. et al. Global Energy Assessment-Toward a Sustainable Future Ch. 17, 1203–1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
    Google Scholar
  17. Rao, S. et al. Better air for better health: Forging synergies in policies for energy access, climate change and air pollution. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1122–1130 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L. & Riahi, K. The UN’s ‘Sustainable Energy for All’ initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2 °C. Nature Clim. Change 3, 545–551 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Pachauri, S. et al. Pathways to achieve universal household access to modern energy by 2030. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024015 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Van Vuuren, D. et al. RCP26: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Climatic Change 109, 95–116 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Thomson, A. et al. RCP45: A pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Climatic Change 109, 77–94 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Van Ruijven, B. et al. Modeling energy and development: An evaluation of models and concepts. World Dev. 36, 2801–2821 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Pozzer, A. et al. Effects of business-as-usual anthropogenic emissions on air quality. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 6915–6937 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
    Google Scholar
  25. Riahi, K., Gruebler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. 74, 887–935 (2007) (Special Issue: Greenhouse Gases—Integrated Assessment).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Masui, T. et al. An emission pathway for stabilization at 6 W m−2 radiative forcing. Climatic Change 109, 59–76 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Granier, C. et al. Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period. Climatic Change 109, 163–190 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Van Ruijven, B. et al. Enhancing the relevance of shared socioeconomic pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research. Climatic Change 122, 481–494 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. O’Neill, B. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Rao, S. & Riahi, K. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: Long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Energy J. 27, 177–200 (2006).
    Google Scholar
  31. Amann, M. et al. Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications. Environ. Modell. Softw. 26, 1489–1501 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 493, 79–83 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Pachauri, S. et al. Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future Ch. 19, 1401–1458 (Cambridge Univ. Press, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
    Google Scholar

Download references