Land-use protection for climate change mitigation (original) (raw)

References

  1. Van der Werf, G. R. et al. CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geosci. 2, 737–738 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Houghton, R. A. et al. Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences 9, 5125–5142 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Ebeling, J. & Yasué, M. Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 1917–1924 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Don, A., Schumacher, J. & Freibauer, A. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks—a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1658–1670 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nature Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Kindermann, G. et al. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10302–10307 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Nepstad, D. C., Boyd, W., Stickler, C. M., Bezerra, T. & Azevedo, A. A. Responding to climate change and the global land crisis: REDD +, market transformation and low-emissions rural development. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120167 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Ghazoul, J., Butler, R. A., Mateo-Vega, J. & Koh, L. P. REDD: A reckoning of environment and development implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 396–402 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, T. A. et al. A framework for integrating biodiversity concerns into national REDD + programmes. Biol. Conserv. 154, 61–71 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465–3472 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Gan, J. & McCarl, B. A. Measuring transnational leakage of forest conservation. Ecol. Econ. 64, 423–432 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Miles, L. & Kapos, V. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Global land-use implications. Science 320, 1454–1455 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Smith, P. Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 81, 169–178 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Guo, L. B. & Gifford, R. M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: A meta analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 8, 345–360 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Popp, A. et al. Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: Model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options. Climatic Change 123, 495–509 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Wise, M. et al. Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324, 1183–1186 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Reilly, J. et al. Using land to mitigate climate change: Hitting the target, recognizing the trade-offs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5672–5679 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Lotze-Campen, H. et al. Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: A spatially explicit mathematical programming approach. Agric. Econ. 39, 325–338 (2008).
    Google Scholar
  20. Müller, C. & Robertson, R. D. Projecting future crop productivity for global economic modeling. Agric. Econ. 45, 37–50 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Bondeau, A. et al. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 679–706 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Schaphoff, S. et al. Contribution of permafrost soils to the global carbon budget. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 014026 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. O’ Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: The concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Harvey, C. A., Dickson, B. & Kormos, C. Opportunities for achieving biodiversity conservation through REDD. Conserv. Lett. 3, 53–61 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Stickler, C. M. et al. The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: A critical review and case study from the Amazon region. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2803–2824 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Popp, A. et al. The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 034017 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Popp, A. et al. Additional CO2 emissions from land use change—Forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy. Ecol. Econ. 74, 64–70 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Smith, P. et al. How much land based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2285–2302 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Humpenöder, F. et al. Investigating afforestation and bioenergy CCS as climate change mitigation strategies. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 064029 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Dietrich, J. P., Schmitz, C., Lotze-Campen, H., Popp, A. & Müller, C. Forecasting technological change in agriculture—An endogenous implementation in a global land use model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 236–249
  35. Bodirsky, B. L. et al. N2O emissions from the global agricultural nitrogen cycle–current state and future scenarios. Biogeosciences 9, 4169–4197 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references