A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering (original) (raw)

References

  1. Robock, A. 20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea. Bull. Atom. Sci. 64, 14–18 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Bala, G., Duffy, P. B. & Taylor, K. E. Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7664–7669 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Kleidon, A. & Renner, M. A simple explanation for the sensitivity of the hydrological cycle to surface temperature and solar radiation and its implications for global climate change. Earth Syst. Dynam. 4, 455–465 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Nordhaus, W. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies (Yale Univ. Press, 2008).
    Google Scholar
  5. Keith, D. W. & Parker, A. The fate of an engineered planet. Sci. Am. 308, 34–36 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere–ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6. Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Kravitz, B. et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Atmos. Sci. Lett. 12, 162–167 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. MacMartin, D. G., Keith, D. W., Kravitz, B. & Caldeira, K. Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing. Nature Clim. Change 3, 365–368 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B., Keith, D. W. & Jarvis A. J. Dynamics of the couple human-climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering. Clim. Dyn. 43, 243–258 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. MacMartin, D. G., Caldeira, K. & Keith, D. W. Solar geoengineering to limit rates of change, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140134 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Smith, S. J. & Rasch, P. J. The long-term policy context for solar radiation management. Clim. Change 121, 487–497 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Moreno-Cruz, J., Ricke, K. & Keith, D. W. A simple model to account for regional inequalities in the effectiveness of solar radiation management. Clim. Change 110, 649–668 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Kravitz, B. et al. A multi-model assessment of regional climate disparities caused by solar geoengineering. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748–9326/9/7/074013 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Weitzman, M. What is the damages function for global warming—and what difference might it make? Clim. Change Econ. 1, 57–69 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Goes, M., Tuana, N. & Keller, K. The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. Clim. Change 109, 719–744 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Lempert, R. J., Schlesinger, M. E., Bankes, S. C. & Andronova, N. G. The impacts of climate variability on near-term policy choices and the value of information. Clim. Change 45, 129–161 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Anderson, J. G., Wilmouth, D. M., Smith, J. B. & Sayres, D. S. UV dosage levels in summer: Increased risk of ozone loss from convectively injected water vapor. Science 337, 835–839 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. MacMynowski, D. G., Keith, D. W., Caldeira, K. & Shin, H-J. Can we test geoengineering? Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 5044–5052 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Diffenbaugh, N. S. & Field, C. B. Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science 341, 486–492 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Schloss, C. A., Nuñez, T. A. & Lawler, J. J. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8606–8611 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Wigley, T. M. L. A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science 314, 452–454 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Transient climate-carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9949–9954 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Stocker, T. F. & Schmittner, A. Influence of CO2 emission rates on the stability of the thermohaline circulation. Nature 388, 862–865 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Eliseev, A. V., Chernokulsky, A. V., Karpenko, A. A. & Mokhov, I. I. Global warming mitigation by sulphur loading in the stratosphere: dependence of required emissions on allowable residual warming rate. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 101, 67–81 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Pierce, J. R., Weisenstein, D. K., Heckendorn, P., Peter, T. & Keith, D. W. Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensable vapor from aircraft. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L18805 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. McClellan, J., Keith, D. W. & Apt, J. Cost analysis of stratospheric albedo modification delivery systems. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034019 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Heckendorn, P. et al. The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045108 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. English, J. M., Toon, O. B. & Mills, M. J. Microphysical simulations of sulfur burdens from stratospheric sulfur geoengineering. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 4775–4793 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Blackstock, J. J. et al. Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies (Novim, 2009); http://arxiv.org/pdf/0907.5140
    Google Scholar
  30. Geels, F. W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 33, 897–920 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Jones, C. A fast ocean GCM without flux adjustments. J. Atm. Ocean Technol. 20, 1857–1868 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Rinsland, C. P. et al. Post-Mount Pinatubo eruption ground-based infrared stratospheric column measurements of HNO3, NO, and NO2 and their comparison with model calculations. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4437 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references