Selection of climate policies under the uncertainties in the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC (original) (raw)

References

  1. Kunreuther, H. et al. Risk management and climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 447–450 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  3. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  4. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  5. Cerreia-Vioglio, S., Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M. & Montrucchio, L. Classical subjective expected utility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6754–6759 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Savage, L. J. The Foundations of Statistics (Dover Publications, 1954).
    Google Scholar
  7. Heal, G. & Millner, A. Uncertainty and decision making in climate change economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8, 120–137 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Ellsberg, D. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75, 643–669 (1961).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Lempert, R. J. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis (Rand, 2003).
    Book Google Scholar
  10. George, E. I. & Clyde, M. Model uncertainty. Stat. Sci. 19, 81–94 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Tebaldi, C. & Knutti, R. The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 2053–2075 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Knutti, R., Furrer, R., Tebaldi, C., Cermak, J. & Meehl, G. A. Challenges in combining projections from multiple climate models. J. Clim. 23, 2739–2758 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Nordhaus, B. Warming the World: Economic Model of Global Warming (MIT Press, 2000).
    Book Google Scholar
  14. Millner, A., Dietz, S. & Heal, G. Scientific ambiguity and climate policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 55, 21–46 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Ackerman, F., Stanton, E. A. & Bueno, R. Epstein–Zin utility in dice: Is risk aversion irrelevant to climate policy? Environ. Resour. Econ. 56, 73–84 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Tavoni, M. et al. Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models. Nature Clim. Change 5, 119–126 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change 123, 353–367 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Babonneau, F., Haurie, A., Loulou, R. & Vielle, M. Combining stochastic optimization and Monte Carlo simulation to deal with uncertainties in climate policy assessment. Environ. Model. Assess. 17, 51–76 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 493, 79–83 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Lemoine, D. & McJeon, H. C. Trapped between two tails: Trading off scientific uncertainties via climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034019 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Steinacher, M., Joos, F. & Stocker, T. F. Allowable carbon emissions lowered by multiple climate targets. Nature 499, 197–201 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Urban, N. M. & Keller, K. Probabilistic hindcasts and projections of the coupled climate, carbon cycle and Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation system: A Bayesian fusion of century-scale observations with a simple model. Tellus A 62, 737–750 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Ackerman, F., DeCanio, S. J., Howarth, R. B. & Sheeran, K. Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change. Climatic Change 95, 297–315 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Pindyck, R. S. Climate change policy: What do the models tell us? J. Econ. Literature 51, 860–872 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. Technical Update of The Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis—Under Executive Order 12866 (United States Government, 2013).
  28. Wald, A. Statistical decision functions. Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 165–205 (1949).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Houser, T. et al. American Climate Prospectus: Economic Risks in The United States (Rhodium Group, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  30. Knutti, R. & Sedláček, J. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Clim. Change 3, 369–373 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Calvin, K. et al. The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: Results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ. 34, S251–S260 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 8–23 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Kriegler, E. et al. Roadmaps Towards Sustainable Energy Futures and Climate Protection: A Synthesis of Results from The RoSE Project 1st edn (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2013); http://www.rose-project.org/Content/Public/RoSE_REPORT_310513_ES.pdf
    Google Scholar
  34. Fischer, C. & Morgenstern, R. D. Carbon abatement costs: Why the wide range of estimates? Energy J. 27, 73–86 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Kriegler, E. Imprecise Probability Analysis for Integrated Assessment of Climate Change PhD thesis, Potsdam Univ. (2005)
  36. Ricciuto, D. M., Davis, K. J. & Keller, K. A Bayesian calibration of a simple carbon cycle model: The role of observations in estimating and reducing uncertainty. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB2030 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Welch, B. L. The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34, 28–35 (1947).
    CAS Google Scholar
  38. Tol, R. S. Targets for global climate policy: An overview. J. Econ. Dynam. Control 37, 911–928 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Weitzman, M. Handbook of Environmental Accounting 187–207 (Edward Elgar, 2010).
    Google Scholar
  40. Weitzman, M. L. Targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages. J. Public Econ. Theory 14, 221–244 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  42. Epstein, L. G. & Zin, S. E. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica 57, 937–969 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Gilboa, I. & Schmeidler, D. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Econ. Perspect. 18, 141–153 (1989).
    Google Scholar
  44. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
    Book Google Scholar
  45. Nordhaus, W. D. & Weitzman, M. L. A Review of the “Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change”. J. Econ. Literature 45, 703–724 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Vissing-Jörgensen, A. & Attanasio, O. P. Stock-market participation, intertemporal substitution, and risk-aversion. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 383–391 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Bansal, R. & Yaron, A. Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles. J. Finance 59, 1481–1509 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references