National post-2020 greenhouse gas targets and diversity-aware leadership (original) (raw)

References

1. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 2013).
2. Rogelj, J. et al. Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry. Nature 464, 1126–1128 (2010).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
3. Joughin, I., Smith, B. E. & Medley, B. Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science 344, 735–738 (2014).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. McCollum, D. et al. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges. Climatic Change 119, 479–494 (2013).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Riahi, K. et al. Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future 1203–1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2012).
   Google Scholar
6. Winkler, H. & Rajamani, L. CBDR&RC in a regime applicable to all. Clim. Policy 14, 102–121 (2014).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Hof, A., Brink, C., Beltran, A. & den Elzen, M. Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for 2030. Conditions for an EU Target of 40% (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2012).
   Google Scholar
8. Knopf, B., Luderer, G. & Edenhofer, O. Exploring the feasibility of low stabilization targets. WIREs Clim. Change 2, 617–626 (2011).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Kriegler, E. et al. Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24–44 (2015).
   Google Scholar
10. Tavoni, M. et al. Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models. Nature Clim. Change 5, 119–126 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Hohne, N., Den Elzen, M. & Escalante, D. Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: A comparison of studies. Clim. Policy 14, 122–147 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: The Physical Science Basis (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
13. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, R. L.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
14. The Emissions Gap Report 2013 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2013).
15. Teng, F. Technical Briefing by China: Historical Responsibility: From a Perspective of Percapita Cumulative Emissions [Presentation] (UNFCCC, 2009).
16. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision (UN, 2013); http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm
17. ADP U Negotiation Text—Work of the Contact Group on Item 3—Advance unedited version 86 (UNFCCC—Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, 2015).
    Google Scholar
18. Decision 1/CP.17 Establishment of an Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action 86 (UNFCCC, 2011).
19. Rose, A. Reducing conflict in global warming policy: The potential of equity as a unifying principle. Energy Policy 18, 927–935 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Ringius, L., Torvanger, A. & Underdal, A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2, 1–22 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Müller, B. Justice in Global Warming Negotiations: How to Obtain a Procedurally Fair Compromise (Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 1999).
    Google Scholar
22. Berk, M. M. & den Elzen, M. G. Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: How to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? Clim. Policy 1, 465–480 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Winkler, H. et al. Equitable Access to Sustainable Development—Contribution to the Body of Scientific Knowledge (BASIC Expert Group, 2011).
    Google Scholar
24. Höhne, N., den Elzen, M. & Weiss, M. Common but differentiated convergence (CDC): A new conceptual approach to long-term climate policy. Clim. Policy 6, 181–199 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
25. den Elzen, M. G., Höhne, N., Brouns, B., Winkler, H. & Ott, H. E. Differentiation of countries’ future commitments in a post-2012 climate regime: An assessment of the “South–North Dialogue” proposal. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 185–203 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
26. Winkler, H., Letete, T. & Marquard, A. Equitable access to sustainable development: Operationalizing key criteria. Clim. Policy 13, 411–432 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
27. Babonneau, F., Haurie, A. & Vielle, M. A robust meta-game for climate negotiations. Comput. Manage. Sci. 10, 299–329 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Pan, X. Z., Teng, F. H. & Wang, G. Sharing emission space at an equitable basis: Allocation scheme based on the equal cumulative emission per capita principle. Appl. Energy 113, 1810–1818 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
29. Bode, S. Equal emissions per capita over time—a proposal to combine responsibility and equity of rights for post-2012 GHG emission entitlement allocation. Eur. Environ. 14, 300–316 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
30. WBGU Solving the Climate Dilemma: The Budget Approach (German Advisory Council on Global Change, 2009).
    Google Scholar
31. Raupach, M. R. et al. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nature Clim. Change 4, 873–879 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
32. Weinrib, E. J. Corrective justice in a nutshell. Univ. Toronto Law Rev. 52, 349–356 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Submission on Quantified economy-wide emission targets for 2020 (UNFCCC, 2010); http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_15/copenhagen_accord/application/pdf/unitedstatescphaccord_app.1.pdf
34. US Cover Note, INDC, and Accompanying Information 5 (UNFCCC, 2015); http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/United%20States%20of%20America/1/U.S.%20Cover%20Note%20INDC%20and%20Accompanying%20Information.pdf
35. EU28 Submission by Latvia and the European Commission on behalf of the European Union and its Member States: Intended Nationally Determined Contribution of the EU and its Member States 5 (Latvian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, 2015); http://www4.unfccc.int/submissions/INDC/Published%20Documents/Latvia/1/LV-03-06-EU%20INDC.pdf
    Google Scholar
36. FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/CRP.6 ∗ : Report on the Workshop on a Shared Vision for Long-Term Cooperative Action (UNFCCC, 2008).
37. Prime Minister’s Statement Prior to his Departure for Copenhagen 1 (Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, 2009); http://www.mea.gov.in/outoging-visit-detail.htm?1363/Prime+Ministers+Statement+Prior+to+his+Departure+for+Copenhagen
38. Jayaraman, T., Kanitkar, T. & Dsouza, M. in Equitable Access to Sustainable Development—Contribution to the Body of Scientific Knowledge (eds Winkler, H. et al.) 59–77 (BASIC Expert Group, 2011).
    Google Scholar
39. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).
    Book Google Scholar
40. Grubb, M. & Gupta, J. Climate Change and European Leadership 15–24 (Springer, 2000).
    Book Google Scholar
41. Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. Democracy and Disagreement (Harvard Univ. Press, 2009).
    Google Scholar
42. Cohen, J. in The Idea of Democracy (eds Copp, D., Hampton, J. & Roemer, J. E.) 270–291 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).
    Google Scholar
43. Light, A. & Katz, E. Environmental Pragmatism (Psychology Press, 1996).
    Google Scholar
44. Sunstein, C. R. Incompletely theorized agreements. Harv. Law Rev. 108, 1733–1772 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Traxler, M. Fair chore division for climate change. Soc. Theory Pract. 28, 101–134 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action Negotiating text FCCC/ADP/2015/1 (UNFCCC, 2015); http://unfccc.int/documentation/documents/advanced_search/items/6911.php?priref=600008407#beg
    Google Scholar
47. Waltz, K. N. Theory of International Politics (Waveland Press, 1979).
    Google Scholar
48. Priest, M. Australia may not Sign up to Paris Climate Deal: Andew Robb (The Sydney Morning Herald, 2014).
    Google Scholar
49. Young, O. R. Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. Int. Organ. 45, 281–308 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
50. U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change (Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 2014); https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change
51. Climate Action Tracker Climate Action Tracker (2015); http://climateactiontracker.org
    Google Scholar
52. Boyd, R., Stern, N. & Ward, B. What will Global Annual Emissions of Greenhouse Gases be in 2030, and will They be Consistent with Avoiding Global Warming of More than 2C? (ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy and Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, 2015).
    Google Scholar
53. Sha, F., Ji, Z. & Linwei, L. An Analysis of China’s INDC (China National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International Cooperation, 2015).
    Google Scholar
54. Global Energy-Related Emissions of Carbon Dioxide Stalled in 2014 (IEA, 2015); http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2015/march/global-energy-related-emissions-of-carbon-dioxide-stalled-in-2014.html
55. Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109, 213–241 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
56. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Summary for Policymakers (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
57. Baer, P., Athanasiou, T., Kartha, S. & Kemp-Benedict, E. The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World (EcoEquality, 2008).
    Google Scholar
58. Nabel, J. E. M. S. et al. Decision support for international climate policy—The PRIMAP emission module. Environ. Modelling Softw. 26, 1419–1433 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Yu, K. & Jones, M. Local linear quantile regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93, 228–237 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references