Implications for climate sensitivity from the response to individual forcings (original) (raw)

References

  1. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R. & Webster, M. D. Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295, 113–117 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H. & Sokolov, A. P. Estimated PDFs of climate system properties including natural and anthropogenic forcings. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L01705 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Lewis, N. & Curry, J. A. The implications for climate sensitivity of AR5 forcing and heat uptake estimates. Clim. Dynam. 45, 1009–1023 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Otto, A. et al. Energy budget constraints on climate response. Nature Geosci. 6, 415–416 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Ring, M. J., Lindner, D., Cross, E. F. & Schlesinger, M. E. Causes of the global warming observed since the 19th century. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 02, 401–415 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  6. Aldrin, M. et al. Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content. Environmetrics 23, 253–271 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. PALAEOSENS Project Members Making sense of palaeoclimate sensitivity. Nature 491, 683–691 (2012).
  8. Hargreaves, J. C., Annan, J. D., Yoshimori, M. & Abe-Ouchi, A. Can the Last Glacial Maximum constrain climate sensitivity? Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L24702 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Sherwood, S. C., Bony, S. & Dufresne, J. Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing. Nature 505, 37–42 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Fasullo, J. T. & Trenberth, K. E. A less cloudy future: the role of subtropical subsidence in climate sensitivity. Science 338, 792–794 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, J. et al. in Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity Vol. 29 (eds Hansen, J. E. & Takahashi, T.) 130–163 (American Geophysical Union, 1984).
    Book Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, J. E. et al. Efficacy of climate forcings. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D18104 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Stuber, N., Ponater, M. & Sausen, R. Why radiative forcing might fail as a predictor of climate change. Clim. Dynam. 24, 497–510 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Köhler, P. et al. What caused Earth’s temperature variations during the last 800,000 years? Data-based evidence on radiative forcing and constraints on climate sensitivity. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 129–145 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Schmittner, A. et al. Climate sensitivity estimated from temperature reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum. Science 334, 1385–1388 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Rose, B. E., Armour, K. C., Battisti, D. S., Feldl, N. & Koll, D. D. The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1071–1078 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Winton, M., Takahashi, K. & Held, I. M. Importance of ocean heat uptake efficacy to transient climate change. J. Clim. 23, 2333–2344 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Armour, K. C., Bitz, C. M. & Roe, G. H. Time-varying climate sensitivity from regional feedbacks. J. Clim. 26, 4518–4534 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Kummer, J. R. & Dessler, A. E. The impact of forcing efficacy on the equilibrium climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 3565–3568 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Shindell, D. T. Inhomogeneous forcing and transient climate sensitivity. Nature Clim. Change 4, 274–277 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Miller, R. L. et al. CMIP5 historical simulations (1850–2012) with GISS ModelE2. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, 441–477 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Nazarenko, L. et al. Future climate change under rcp emission scenarios with GISS ModelE2. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 7, 244–267 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt, G. A. et al. Configuration and assessment of the GISS ModelE2 contributions to the CMIP5 archive. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6, 141–184 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Gregory, J. M. et al. A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03205 (2004).
    Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, J. E. et al. Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 25679–25720 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Gregory, J. M., Andrews, T. & Good, P. The inconstancy of the transient climate response parameter under increasing CO2 . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 373, 20140417 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Shindell, D. & Faluvegi, G. Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century. Nature Geosci. 2, 294–300 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Tomassini, L., Reichert, P., Knutti, R., Stocker, T. F. & Borsuk, M. E. Robust bayesian uncertainty analysis of climate system properties using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. J. Clim. 20, 1239–1254 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Merlis, T. M., Held, I. M., Stenchikov, G. L., Zeng, F. & Horowitz, L. W. Constraining transient climate sensitivity using coupled climate model simulations of volcanic eruptions. J. Clim. 27, 7781–7795 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references