Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement (original) (raw)

References

1. Keohane, R.O. & Victor, D. G. Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 570–575 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
2. Aldy, J. E. & Pizer, W. A. Alternative metrics for comparing domestic climate change mitigation efforts and the emerging international climate policy architecture. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10, 3–24 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Aldy, J. E., Pizer, W. A. & Akimoto, K. Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries. Clim. Policy 1–15 (2016).
4. Schelling, T. C. An essay on bargaining. Am. Econ. Rev. 46, 281–306 (1956).
   Google Scholar
5. Chayes, A. & Chayes, A. H. Compliance without enforcement: state behavior under regulatory treaties. Negotiation J. 7, 311–330 (1991).
   Article Google Scholar
6. Barrett, S. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Manag. Environ. Qual. 14, 622–623 (2003).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J. & Hey, E. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).
   Google Scholar
8. Victor, D. G. in Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World (eds Stavins, R. N. & Aldy, J. E.) 133–172 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
   Book Google Scholar
9. Pizer, W. A. in Architectures for Agreement: Addressing Global Climate Change in the Post-Kyoto World (eds Stavins, R. N. & Aldy, J. E.) 280–314 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
   Book Google Scholar
10. Ostrom, E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 92, 1–22 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
11. den Elzen, M. G. J., Hof, A. F. & Roelfsema, M. The emission gap between the Copenhagen pledges and the 2 °C climate goal: options for closing and risks that could widen the gap. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 733–743 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
12. The Emission Gap Report 2010: Are the Copenhagen Pledges Sufficient to Limit Global Warming to 2 °C or 1.5 °C? (UN Environment Programme, 2010).
13. Thompson, A. Management under anarchy: the international politics of climate change. Climatic Change 78, 7–29 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Aldy, J. E. The crucial role of policy surveillance in international climate policy. Climatic Change 126, 279–292 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Aldy, J. E. in Handbook on Energy and Climate Change (ed. Fouquet, R.) 352–374 (Elgar, 2012).
    Google Scholar
16. Manne, A., Mendelsohn, R. & Richels, R. MERGE. Energy Policy 23, 17–34 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Aldy, J. E. Evaluating Mitigation Effort: Tools and Institutions for Assessing Nationally Determined Contributions (Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, 2015).
    Google Scholar
18. Houser, T. Copenhagen, the Accord, and the way Forward (Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2010).
    Google Scholar
19. Dellink, R., Briner, G. & Clapp, C. Costs, Revenues, and Effectiveness of the Copenhagen Accord Emission Pledges for 2020 (OECD, 2010).
    Google Scholar
20. McKibbin, W. J., Morris, A. C. & Wilcoxen, P. J. Comparing climate commitments: a model-based analysis of the Copenhagen Accord. Climate Change Economics 2, 79–103 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Clarke, L. et al. International climate policy architectures: overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Econ. 31, S64–S81 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Kriegler, E., Tavoni, M., Riahi, K. & vanVuuren, D. P. Introducing the limits special issue. Clim. Change Econ. 4, 1302002 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Kriegler, E. et al. Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24–44 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Tavoni, M. et al. Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 119–126 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Fawcett, A. A. et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350, 1168–1169 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
26. Cai, Y., Judd, K. L. & Lontzek, T. S. The social cost of carbon with economic and climate risks. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.06909 (2015).
27. Stern, D. I., Pezzey, J. C. V. & Lambie, N. R. Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions? Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 56, 315–331 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Bodansky, D. M., Hoedl, S. A., Metcalf, G. E. & Stavins, R. N. Facilitating linkage of climate policies through the Paris outcome. Clim. Policy 1–17 (2015).
29. Cooper, R. in Post-Kyoto International Climate Policy: Implementing Architectures for Agreement (eds Stavins, R. N. & Aldy, J. E.) 151–78 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
    Google Scholar
30. Akimoto, K. et al. Comparison of marginal abatement cost curves for 2020 and 2030: longer perspectives for effective global GHG emission reductions. Sustain. Sci. 7, 157–168 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Akimoto, K. et al. Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost. Energy Policy 38, 3384–3393 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
32. Joint Global Change Research Institute Global Change Assessment Model v. 4.2 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2015); http://www.globalchange.umd.edu/archived-models/gcam/download
33. Blanford, G., Merrick, J., Richels, R. & Rose, S. Trade-offs between mitigation costs and temperature change. Climatic Change 123, 527–541 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. WITCH: A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J. 27, 13–38 (2006).
    Google Scholar
35. Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Analysis Under Executive Order 12866 (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2015).
36. Council of Economic Advisers Economic Report of the President (US Government Publishing Office, 2016).

Download references