Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models (original) (raw)

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
  2. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
  3. McJeon, H. C. et al. Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas. Nature 514, 482–485 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
  4. Glynn, J. et al. Informing energy and climate policies using energy systems models. 30, 359–387 (2015).
  5. Grubler, A. et al. The Global Energy Assessment: Toward a More Sustainable Future (GEA, IIASA, 2012).
    Google Scholar
  6. Hejazi, M. et al. Long-term global water projections using six socioeconomic scenarios in an integrated assessment modeling framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 205–226 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  7. Energy Technology Perspectives 2015 (IEA, 2015).
  8. Smith, S. J. et al. Long history of IAM comparisons. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 391 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  9. Kriegler, E. et al. Making or breaking climate targets: the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24–44 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  10. Fischer-Kowalski, M. & Weisz, H. Society as hybrid between material and symbolic realms: toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Adv. Hum. Ecol. 8, 215–251 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  11. Hellweg, S. & Milà i Canals, L. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344, 1109–1113 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
  12. Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
  13. Pauliuk, S. & Müller, D. B. The role of in-use stocks in the social metabolism and in climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Change 24, 132–142 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  14. Müller, D. B., Wang, T., Duval, B. & Graedel, T. E. Exploring the engine of anthropogenic iron cycles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 16111–16116 (2006).
    Google Scholar
  15. Graedel, T. E., Harper, E. M., Nassar, N. T. & Reck, B. K. On the materials basis of modern society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6295–6300 (2013).
    Google Scholar
  16. Lenzen, M. & Reynolds, C. J. A supply-use approach to waste input-output analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 212–226 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  17. Chertow, M. R. 'Uncovering' industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 11–30 (2007).
    Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, C. A. et al. Energy and material flows of megacities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5985–5990 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
  19. Ramaswami, A., Chavez, A. & Chertow, M. Carbon footprinting of cities and implications for analysis of urban material and energy flows. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 783–785 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  20. Creutzig, F. et al. Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 320–327 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  21. Dandres, T., Gaudreault, C., Tirado-Seco, P. & Samson, R. Assessing non-marginal variations with consequential LCA: application to European energy sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 3121–3132 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  22. Earles, J. M. & Halog, A. Consequential life cycle assessment: a review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 445–453 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  23. Daly, H. E., Scott, K., Strachan, N. & Barrett, J. R. The indirect CO2 emission implications of energy system pathways: Linking IO and TIMES models for the UK. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10701–10709 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
  24. Pauliuk, S. & Hertwich, E. G. in Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology (eds Clift, R. & Duckmann, A.) 21–43 (Springer, 2016).
    Google Scholar
  25. Hackett, S. B. & Moxnes, E. Natural capital in integrated assessment models of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 116, 354–361 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  26. Harfoot, M. et al. Integrated assessment models for ecologists: the present and the future. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 124–143 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  27. Strachan, N., Fais, B. & Daly, H. E. Reinventing the energy modelling–policy interface. Nat. Energy 1, 16012 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  28. Peters, G. P. The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 646–649 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  29. Stern, N. Current climate models are grossly misleading. Nature 530, 407–409 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  30. Hertwich, E. G. & Peters, G. P. Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6414–6420 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
  31. Wiedmann, T. O. et al. A carbon footprint time series of the UK – results from a multi-region input–output model. Econ. Syst. Res. 22, 19–42 (2010).
    Google Scholar
  32. Weinzettel, J., Hertwich, E. G., Peters, G. P., Steen-Olsen, K. & Galli, A. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 433–438 (2013).
    Google Scholar
  33. Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).
    CAS Google Scholar
  34. Hertwich, E. G. et al. Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6277–6282 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
  35. Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G. & Strømman, A. H. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J. Ind. Ecol. 17, 53–64 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
  36. Frischknecht, R. et al. The environmental relevance of capital goods in life cycle assessments of products and services. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12, 7–17 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
  37. Yeh, S. & Sperling, D. Low carbon fuel standards: Implementation scenarios and challenges. Energy Policy 38, 6955–6965 (2010).
    Google Scholar
  38. Creutzig, F., McGlynn, E., Minx, J. & Edenhofer, O. Climate policies for road transport revisited (I): evaluation of the current framework. Energy Policy 39, 2396–2406 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
  39. Grübler, A. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures. (Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  40. Müller, D. B. Stock dynamics for forecasting material flows - case study for housing in the Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 59, 142–156 (2006).
    Google Scholar
  41. Elshkaki, A., Graedel, T. E., Ciacci, L. & Reck, B. K. Copper demand, supply, and associated energy use to 2050. Glob. Environ. Change 39, 305–315 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  42. Tanikawa, H. & Hashimoto, S. Urban stock over time: spatial material stock analysis using 4d-GIS. Build. Res. Inf. 37, 483–502 (2009).
    Google Scholar
  43. Fischedick, M. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 10 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
    Google Scholar
  44. Liu, G., Bangs, C. E. & Müller, D. B. Stock dynamics and emission pathways of the global aluminium cycle. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 338–342 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  45. Milford, R. L., Pauliuk, S., Allwood, J. M. & Müller, D. B. The roles of energy and material efficiency in meeting steel industry CO2 targets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 3455–3462 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
  46. Allwood, J. M., Cullen, J. M. & Milford, R. L. Options for achieving a 50% cut in industrial carbon emissions by 2050. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1888–1894 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
  47. Ayres, R. U. & Kneese, A. Production, consumption, and externalities. Amer. Econ. Rev. 59, 282–297 (1969).
    Google Scholar
  48. Frischknecht, R. et al. The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 10, 3–9 (2005).
    CAS Google Scholar
  49. Finnveden, G. et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 91, 1–21 (2009).
    Google Scholar
  50. Graedel, T. E. et al. Multilevel cycle of anthropogenic copper. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 1242–1252 (2004).
    CAS Google Scholar
  51. Nakamura, S. & Kondo, Y. Input-output analysis of waste management. J. Ind. Ecol. 6, 39–63 (2002).
    Google Scholar
  52. Majeau-Bettez, G., Wood, R. & Strømman, A. H. Unified theory of allocations and constructs in life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 747–770 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
  53. Yu, C., Davis, C. & Dijkema, G. P. J. Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis research. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 280–293 (2014).
    Google Scholar
  54. Kennedy, C. A., Cuddihy, J. & Engel-Yan, J. The changing metabolism of cities. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 43–59 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
  55. Kenworthy, J. R. & Laube, F. B. Patterns of automobile dependency in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some applications for urban policy. Transp. Res. Part A 33, 691–723 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  56. Seto, K. C. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 12 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
    Google Scholar
  57. Keirstead, J., Jennings, M. & Sivakumar, A. A review of urban energy system models: approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3847–3866 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  58. Rosen, R. A. IAMs and peer review. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 390 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  59. Rosen, R. A. Critical review of: “Making or breaking climate targets — the AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy”. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 96, 322–326 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  60. Nakata, T. Energy-economic models and the environment. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 30, 417–475 (2004).
    Google Scholar
  61. Fleiter, T., Worrell, E. & Eichhammer, W. Barriers to energy efficiency in industrial bottom-up energy demand models — a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 3099–3111 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  62. Mundaca, L., Neij, L., Worrell, E. & McNeil, M. Evaluating energy efficiency policies with energy-economy models. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35, 305–344 (2010).
    Google Scholar
  63. Worrell, E., Ramesohl, S. & Boyd, G. Advances in energy forecasting models based on engineering economics. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 29, 345–381 (2004).
    Google Scholar
  64. Nakata, T., Silva, D. & Rodionov, M. Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37, 462–502 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
  65. Grubb, M., Köhler, J. & Anderson, D. Induced technical change in energy and environmental modelling: analytic approaches and policy implications. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27, 271–308 (2002).
    Google Scholar
  66. Weyant, J. P. & Olavson, T. Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 67–85 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  67. Matsuoka, Y., Morita, T. & Kainuma, M. in Present and Future of Modeling Global Environmental Change: Toward Integrated Modeling (eds Matsuno, T. & Kida, H.) 339–361 (TERRAPUB, 2001).
    Google Scholar
  68. Dai, H., Masui, T., Matsuoka, Y. & Fujimori, S. Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model. Energy Policy 39, 2875–2887 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  69. Fawcett, A. A. et al. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science 350, 1168–1169 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
  70. Thomson, A. M. et al. RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Climatic Change 109, 77–94 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
  71. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 °C. Climatic Change 109, 95–116 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  72. Deetman, S., Hof, A. F. & van Vuuren, D. P. Deep CO2 emission reductions in a global bottom-up model approach. Clim. Policy 15, 253–271 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  73. Riahi, K., Grubler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 47, 887–935 (2007).
    Google Scholar
  74. Riahi, K. et al. RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 109, 33–57 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
  75. Luderer, G. et al. The economics of decarbonizing the energy system-results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Climatic Change 114, 9–37 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  76. Bauer, N. et al. Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation – an analysis with REMIND. Climatic Change 136, 69–82 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  77. Fais, B., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets. Appl. Energy 162, 699–712 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  78. Arvesen, A., Bright, R. M. & Hertwich, E. G. Considering only first-order effects? How simplifications lead to unrealistic technology optimism in climate change mitigation. Energy Policy 39, 7448–7454 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  79. Arvesen, A., Nes, R., Huertas-Hernando, D. & Hertwich, E. G. Life cycle assessment of an offshore grid interconnecting wind farms and customers across the North Sea. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 826–837 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
  80. Kleijn, R. & van der Voet, E. Resource constraints in a hydrogen economy based on renewable energy sources: an exploration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14, 2784–2795 (2010).
    Google Scholar
  81. Gielen, D. J., Gerlagh, T. & Bos, A. J. M. MATTER 1.0 - A MARKAL Energy and Materials System Model Characterisation (Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  82. Frei, C. W., Haldi, P. A. & Sarlos, G. Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model. Energy Policy 31, 1017–1031 (2003).
    Google Scholar
  83. Böhringer, C. & Rutherford, T. F. Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Econ. 30, 574–596 (2008).
    Google Scholar
  84. Suh, S. et al. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 657–664 (2004).
    CAS Google Scholar
  85. Schwanitz, V. J. Evaluating integrated assessment models of global climate change. Environ. Model. Softw. 50, 120–131 (2013).
    Google Scholar
  86. Müller, D. B., Wang, T. & Duval, B. Patterns of iron use in societal evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 182–188 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  87. Casman, E. A., Morgan, M. G. & Dowlatabadi, H. Mixed levels of uncertainty in complex policy models. Risk Anal. 19, 33–42 (1999).
    Google Scholar
  88. Liu, J. et al. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science http://doi.org/627 (2015).
  89. Bollinger, L. A., Nikolić, I., Davis, C. & Dijkema, G. P. J. Multimodel ecologies: cultivating model ecosystems in industrial ecology. J. Ind. Ecol. 19, 252–263 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  90. De Koning, A., Huppes, G., Deetman, S. & Tukker, A. Scenarios for a 2 °C world: a trade-linked input–output model with high sector detail. Clim. Policy 16, 301–317 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  91. Wiebe, K. S. The impact of renewable energy diffusion on European consumption-based emissions. Econ. Syst. Res. 28, 133–150 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  92. von Stechow, C. et al. Integrating global climate change mitigation goals with other sustainability objectives: a synthesis. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 40, 363–394 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  93. Schäfer, A. Structural change in energy use. Energy Policy 33, 429–437 (2005).
    Google Scholar

Download references