The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change (original) (raw)

• IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
• BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2015 (BP, 2015).
• Energy Technology Perspectives 2014—Harnessing Electricity's Potential (IEA, 2014).
• World Energy Investment Outlook 2014 Factsheet (IEA, 2014).
• Jaccard, M. Sustainable Fossil Fuels: The Unusual Suspect in the Quest for Clean and Enduring Energy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006).
  Book Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A. G., Eickhoff, C. & Hanstock, D. J. Capacity and Balancing Options for the Design of Power Plant in the UK (Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2014); http://go.nature.com/2lTDsAF
  Google Scholar
• Mac Dowell, N. et al. An overview of CO2 capture technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1645–1669 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Boot-Handford, M. E. et al. Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 130–189 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• IPCC IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
• Rochelle, G. T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 325, 1652–1654 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. & Kuuskraa, V. Near-Term Projections of CO2 Utilization for Enhanced Oil Recovery (NETL, 2014).
  Google Scholar
• Godec, M. L. Global Technolgogy Roadmap for CCS in Industry: Sectoral Assessment CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, 2011).
  Google Scholar
• Dooley, J. J. et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geologic Storage (Global Energy Technology Strategy Program, 2006).
  Google Scholar
• Blunt, M. Carbon Dioxide Storage. Briefing Paper No. 4 (Grantham Institute for Climate Change, 2010).
  Google Scholar
• CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option (IEA, 2008).
• Gale, J. Geological storage of CO2: what's known, where are the gaps, and what more needs to be done? Greenhouse Gas Control Technol. 1, 201–206 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage (IEA, 2013).
• The Global Status of CCS: 2015 (Global CCS Institute, 2015).
• Driven by China, Global Methanol Demand to Rise Nearly 80 Percent by 2023; North America Marks Return as “Production Powerhouse”. IHS (29 August 2014).
• The World Factbook (CIA, accessed 18 August 2014); http://go.nature.com/2mbQZ7T
• Key World Energy Statistics (IEA, 2012).
• Energy Technology Perspectives 2012—How to Secure a Clean Energy Future (IEA, 2012).
• Heuberger, C. et al. Quantifying the value of CCS for the future electricity system. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2497–2510 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dai, Z. et al. CO2 accounting and risk analysis for CO2 sequestration at enhanced oil recovery sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 7546–7554 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dai, Z. et al. An integrated framework for optimizing CO2 sequestration and enhanced oil recovery. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 1, 49–54 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Charles, D. Stimulus gives DOE billions for carbon-capture projects. Science 323, 1158 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vora, S. D. DOE/NETL Advanced Carbon Dioxide Capture R&D Program: Technology Update (National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2013).
  Google Scholar
• Optimisation of CO2 Storage in CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects (Advanced Resources International, 2010).
• GHG Equivalencies Calculator—Calculations and References (EPA, 2016).
• Lipponen, J. Storing CO2 Through Enhanced Oil Recovery: Combining EOR with CO2 Storage (EOR+) For Profit (IEA, 2015).
  Google Scholar
• Mui, S. et al. GHG Emission Factors for High Carbon Intensity Crude Oils (Natural Resources Defense Council, 2010).
  Google Scholar
• Inoue, S., Koinuma, H. & Tsuruta, T. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide. J. Polymer Sci. B Polymer Lett. 7, 287–292 (1969).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Song, C. Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catal. Today 115, 2–32 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Song, C. In CO2 Conversion and Utilization (eds Song, C. et al.) 2–30 (ACS, 2002).
  Book Google Scholar
• Aresta, M., Dibenedettoa, A. & Angeini, A. The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization. J. CO2 Utilization 3–4, 65–73 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kolbe, H. & Lautemann, E. Über die Constitution und Basicität der Salicylsäure. Ann. Chem. 113, 125–127 (1869).
  Article Google Scholar
• Solvay, E. Absorption of ammonia in soda ash production. US patent 263,981 A (1882).
• Bosch, C. & Meiser, W. Process of manufacturing urea. US patent 1,429,483 A (1922).
• Department, B. World chemical outlook 2017. Chem. Eng. News 91, 11–19 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• Kirchofer, A., Brandt, A., Krevor, S., Prigiobbe, V. & Wilcox, J. Impact of alkalinity sources on the life-cycle efficiency of mineral carbonation technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 8631–8641 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Olah, G. A., Goeppert, A. & Surya Prakash, G. K. Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. (Wiley, 2009).
  Book Google Scholar
• Van-Dal, E. S. & Bouallou, C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J. Cleaner Prod. 57, 38–45 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hall, C., Balogh, S. & Murphy, D. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have? Energies 2, 25–47 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hall, C. A. S., Lambert, J. G. & Balogh, S. B. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64, 141–152 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Dale, M., Krumdieck, S. & Bodger, P. Global energy modeling: a biophysical approach (GEMBA) part 1: an overview of biophysical economics. Ecol. Econ. 73, 152–157 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kubiszewski, I., Cleveland, C. & Endres, P. Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems. Renew. Energy 36, 218–225 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. S. et al. Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 188–197 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van den Broek, M. et al. Effects of technological learning on future cost and performance of power plants with CO2 capture. Prog. Energy Combustion Sci. 35, 457–480 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar