Cochlear supporting cell transdifferentiation and integration into hair cell layers by inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling (original) (raw)

Introduction

In mammals, sounds are perceived through mechanosensory hair cells located within the sensory epithelium of the cochlea (the organ of Corti). Hair cells produced during development are postmitotic and are not replaced after loss1,2,3,4. As a result, deafness due to hair cell loss is irreversible. Hair cells and adjacent supporting cells arise from a common progenitor that acquires a hair cell or supporting cell phenotype via lateral inhibition mediated by the Notch signalling pathway3,5,6. One of the most promising strategies to regenerate hair cells is to identify and inhibit the factors preventing the conversion of supporting cells into hair cells. For instance, it is well known that supporting cells are prevented from differentiating into hair cells through Notch signalling triggered by ligands expressed by adjacent hair cells6,7. Taking advantage of this observation, it has been shown recently that Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma8.

Within the organ of Corti, hair cells and several types of specialized supporting cells are organized in a regular mosaic pattern that extends along the basal-to-apical axis of the cochlear duct. One of the most striking aspects of this mosaic is that specific cell types are arranged in discrete rows. The edge of the organ of Corti located closest to the modiolus (modiolar boundary) is composed of a single row of alternating inner hair cells and border/inner phalangeal cells (Fig. 1a). Directly adjacent to the inner hair cell row are two rows of pillar cells. Then, three or four rows of outer hair cells and Deiters’ cells are also arranged into a regular alternating mosaic. Finally, the edge of the organ of Corti located closest to the stria vascularis (strial boundary) is formed by the interface between the most strial row of outer hair cells and directly adjacent Hensen’s cells. How hair cells and supporting cells are maintained in distinct rows and compartments still remains unknown.

Figure 1: Ephrin-B2 and EphA4 display complementary expression patterns in the developing organ of Corti.

figure 1

(a) Schematic representation of cell patterning in the organ of Corti. Between the modiolar (MB) and strial (SB) boundaries, myosin-VII+ inner (IHC) and outer hair cells (OHCs, green) and p27kip1+ supporting cells (red) are organized in alternating rows. Beyond the strial boundary are p27kip1+ Hensen’s cells (HeCs). (b–d) Representative example of myosin-VII immunolabelling on transversal section of an E16 ephrin-B2 +/H2BGFP organ of Corti showing that ephrin-B2H2BGFP expression is restricted to both supporting cells and greater epithelial ridge (GER). (e,f) Representative example of in situ hybridization on transversal sections of an E16 organ of Corti showing that ephrin-B2 expression is restricted to both supporting cells and GER (e), whereas EphA4 expression is specifically restricted to hair cells (f), thereby displaying complementary expression patterns. Each of these expression patterns was observed on over ten sections. Scale bar in b represents 5 μm in b–f. BC, border cell; DCs, Deiters’ cells; IPhC, inner phalangeal cell; PCs, pillar cells.

Full size image

Among gene families that have been shown to control tissue morphogenesis, ephrins and their Eph receptors are good candidates for patterning different cell types in the organ of Corti. This large Eph family has been classified into two subclasses, EphA and EphB, according to their affinity for either glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored ephrin-A or transmembrane ephrin-B ligands9. Based on its well-described role in boundary formation between adjacent cell types by interacting with specific EphA4 or EphB receptors10,11,12,13,14, we suggested ephrin-B2 to be involved in a repulsive system allowing cell sorting across the hair cell/supporting cell interface in the organ of Corti. As it has been proposed that cells that can migrate across non-lineage boundaries switch their phenotype to adapt to the identity of their local neighbours15,16,17, manipulating these boundaries could represent an unexpected strategy to generate additional hair cells.

Here we demonstrate that hair cells can be directly generated from supporting cells by inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling. Using either ephrin-B2 conditional knockout mice, short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated gene silencing or soluble inhibitors, we found that downregulation of ephrin-B2 signalling at late embryonic stages, that is, after the normal period of hair cell production, results in supporting cell translocation into hair cell layers and subsequent switch in cell identity from supporting cell to hair cell fate.

Results

Supporting cell-specific expression of ephrin-B2

To test whether ephrin-B2 forms a gene-expression boundary at the hair cell/supporting cell interface, we first analysed GFP expression in the organ of Corti of an ephrin-B2 +/H2BGFP mouse model, in which a nuclear GFP gene, H2BGFP, has been knocked into the Efnb2 locus18. GFP labelling was found to be specifically restricted to both supporting cells and greater epithelial ridge from embryonic day (E) 16, that is, as soon as distinct hair cell morphologies begin to be apparent19 (Fig. 1b–d). Such expression profile distinguishing hair cells from adjacent supporting cells persists in the post-hearing-onset cochlea (Supplementary Fig. 1) and was further confirmed by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1e). In the same aforementioned embryonic time window, we found that, among Eph receptors that are known to interact with ephrin-B2 (EphA4 end EphBs), EphA4 was the only one to be exclusively expressed in both inner and outer hair cells in agreement with previous observations20,21 (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 2). These data, therefore, suggest that ephrin-B2 and EphA4 display complementary expression patterns in the developing organ of Corti, consistent with a role in cell sorting across the hair cell/supporting cell interface. Interestingly, both of these proteins were found to be required for hearing function22,23.

Supporting cell transdifferentiation by loss of ephrin-B2

To test whether in vivo inhibition of ephrin-B2 can be proposed as a strategy to produce extra hair cells, we used a mouse model in which ephrin-B2 is conditionally deleted from glial fibrillary acidic protein-expressing supporting cells24,25, that is, in all supporting cells that are directly in contact with hair cells26,27 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Using parvalbumin labelling as a hair cell-specific marker28, we found that GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox newborn mice exhibit a significant increase in extra inner and outer hair cells compared with WT mice (Fig. 2a,b,i). Importantly, these cells appear not to be produced randomly but rather arise contiguously to pre-existing hair cells and thereby integrate either inner or outer hair cell layer. To know whether extra hair cells come from direct supporting cell transdifferentiation, we used an additional sox2 supporting cell-specific marker19,29. Whereas parvalbumin and sox2 are usually restricted to hair cell and supporting cell populations in neonatal cochleae, respectively, we observed a significant increase in parvalbumin+/sox2+ cells in GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox mice compared with WT animals (Fig. 2c–h,j), meaning that extra hair cells come from direct transdifferentiation of supporting cells. These cells develop stereocilia and are targets of innervation, suggesting a functional integration in the sensorineural circuitry (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Figure 2: In vivo loss of ephrin-B2 induces supporting cells to transdifferentiate into inner and outer hair cells.

figure 2

Parvalbumin immunolabelling alone (a,b) or in combination with sox2 (c–h) of whole-mount cochleae from newborn WT (a) and GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox mice (b–h). Extra inner (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs) arise contiguously to pre-existing hair cells in the absence of ephrin-B2 (asterisks and arrowheads in b). Some of these extra IHCs (c–e) and OHCs (f–h) are positive for both parvalbumin and sox2 (arrowheads). The number of extra IHCs and OHCs (i) and the number of parvalbumin+/sox2+ cells per 100 μm of whole-mount cochlea (j) is significantly increased in GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox (EB2 CKO) compared with WT mice (_n_=4 animals per genotype; *_P_=0.0372 for IHCs, *_P_=0.0171 for OHCs, *_P_=0.0458 for parvalbumin+/sox2+ cells). Statistical significance was determined using a Student’s _t_-test. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. Scale bar in a represents 5 μm in a–h. GER=greater epithelial ridge, HeCs=Hensen’s cells.

Full size image

Ex vivo transdifferentiation by mosaic ephrin-B2 silencing

At boundaries, loss of an ephrin-B gene expression in a mosaic of cells may cause more severe defects than loss of expression in all cells30,31,32. This is because the differential ephrin-B expression makes cells that should be the same behave as distinct populations, whereas they remain a homogenous population if all the cells lack ephrin-B expression30,31,32,33. We then further examined the effect of acute ephrin-B2 silencing at a single supporting cell-scale (thereby artificially creating a mosaic loss of ephrin-B2 signalling at the hair cell/supporting cell interface) by using shRNA electroporation in E16 cochleae. Four ephrin-B2-specific and one irrelevant short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were initially transfected in N2A cells and their protein knockdown efficiency was assessed by western blotting (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 5). Two of them were selected, annealed and subcloned into pCA-b-EGFPm5 silencer 3 vector34 and one of these two constructs provided an efficient in situ downregulation of ephrin-B2 expression (Fig. 3b–e) without increasing cell death (Supplementary Fig. 6). We used myosin-VII as a marker of hair cells35 and p27kip1 as a specific nuclear marker of supporting cells36,37. As expected, hair cells or supporting cells transfected with scrambled shRNA were found to express their own and unique specific marker, that is, myosin-VII or p27kip1, respectively (Fig. 3f–i). By contrast, when targeted by the specific ephrin-B2 shRNA, some cells located on the hair cell side of the hair cell/supporting cell boundary revealed an intermediate identity, by simultaneously expressing p27kip1 and myosin-VII (Fig. 3k–n and Supplementary Fig. 7). The percentage of EGFP+/p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ cells among the total amount of EGFP+/p27kip1+ cells present at the hair cell/supporting cell interface was significantly increased when using ephrin-B2 shRNA compared with scrambled shRNA (Fig. 3j and Supplementary Fig. 8). Importantly, these EGFP+/p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ cells appear to be less p27kip1+ than most of the supporting cells directly located on the supporting cell side of the hair cell/supporting cell boundary (compare yellow and white arrowheads on Fig. 3l,m), suggesting a transient phenotype while translocating from the supporting cell to the hair cell layer. As myosin-VII+ hair cells are never positive for p27kip (refs 11, 36, 37), such co-expression of myosin-VII and p27kip1 unambiguously means that EGFP+/p27kip1+ cells moved from the supporting cell compartment towards the hair cell layer because of loss of ephrin-B2 expression and, as a consequence, progressively switch their identity. Indeed, a sudden cell-autonomous overexpression of p27kip1 in a pre-existing hair cell due to an shRNA-mediated ephrin-B2 silencing would be rather unlikely given that hair cells do not express ephrin-B2. Importantly, it should be noticed that transfected supporting cells that do not translocate in the hair cell layer do not change their fate, meaning that cell displacement is a necessary condition for transdifferentiation (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Figure 3: Ephrin-B2 expression silencing induces supporting cell translocation into the hair cell layer and transdifferentiation.

figure 3

Ex vivo electroporation of E16 cochleae using Enhanced green fluorescent protein control (f–i) or targeted shRNA construct against ephrin-B2 transcript (k–n). (a) Assessment of ephrin-B2 siRNAs knockdown efficiency using western blotting. (b–e) In situ assessment of ephrin-B2 shRNA knockdown efficiency after electroporation using ephrin-B2 immunolabelling focused in the Hensen’s cells (HeCs) layer. EGFP overlaps with ephrin-B2 labelling when using scrambled (Scr.) shRNA (arrowheads in b,c), whereas it does not when using ephrin-B2-targeted shRNA (arrowheads in d,e). (f–i, k–n) Double immunolabelling for p27kip1 and myosin-VII. (f–i) Representative example of an EGFP-labelled p27kip1+ supporting cell transfected using control shRNA and staying in the supporting cell compartment (arrowhead). (j) The percentage of EGFP+/p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ among the total amount of EGFP+/p27kip1+ cells at the hair cell/supporting cell interface is significantly increased when using ephrin-B2 shRNA compared with Scr. shRNA (_n_=3 independent experiments for each condition; **_P_=0.0014). Statistical significance was determined using a Student’s _t_-test. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. (k–n) Representative example of an EGFP-labelled p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ cell transfected with an ephrin-B2 shRNA (yellow arrowhead) located in the hair cell side of the strial boundary (SB, dotted curve). Note that such EGFP+/p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ cell appears to be less p27kip1+ (yellow arrowhead) than most of the supporting cells directly located on the supporting cell side of the SB (white arrowheads) suggesting an intermediate phenotype while switching from supporting cell to hair cell fate. Scale bar in b represents 2 μm in b–e and in (f) represents 5 μm in (f–i, k–n). OHCs=outer hair cells.

Full size image

Switch in supporting cell identity by ephrin-B2 inhibition

To further confirm that adjacent supporting cells can really be reprogrammed into hair cells when disrupting ephrin-B2 signalling, we designed an organotypic assay in which explants of organ of Corti isolated from E16 cochleae were cultured for 4 days in the presence of control IgG-Fc or EphA4-Fc, a soluble inhibitor known to have a high affinity for ephrin-B2 (refs 9, 38). In control condition, the organ of Corti exhibit sharp boundaries with cells displaying a clear and unique phenotype (myosin-VII or p27kip1/sox2), as expected (Fig. 4a–d). By contrast, when blocking ephrin-B2 signalling, a subset of cells become simultaneously positive for p27kip1, sox2 and myosin-VII, unambiguously revealing an intermediate and switching phenotype, especially both at the strial (between outer hair cells and Hensen’s cells, Fig. 4e–h) and modiolar (within or very close to the row of inner hair cells, Fig. 4i–l) boundaries of the organ of Corti. The number of these myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ cells is significantly higher in EphA4-Fc compared with control condition (Fig. 4m). Interestingly, among the same cell population, myosin-VII and p27kip1 display opposing gradients of expression that are perpendicular to the strial boundary of the organ of Corti, suggesting a typical behaviour of cells that are progressively changing their own identity. As a consequence, myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ cells appear to be less p27kip1+ than supporting cells but more than hair cells (p27kip1+ supporting cells>p27kip1+/− supporting cells/hair cells (arrowheads on magnification of Fig. 4g) >p27kip1− hair cells) and simultaneously more myosin-VII+ than supporting cells but less than hair cells (myosin-VII− supporting cells<myosin-VII+/− supporting cells/hair cells (arrowheads on magnification of Fig. 4f)<myosin-VII+ hair cells). This striking feature is exemplified by the difficulty to segregate myosin-VII+ hair cell from p27kip1+ supporting cell populations at both strial (dotted curve on magnifications of Fig. 4e–g) and modiolar (dotted line on Fig. 4i–k) boundaries, as can be easily realized in control condition (dotted line on Fig. 4a–c). Importantly, the supporting cells that are not in contact with hair cells never co-express p27kip1, myosin-VII and sox2. Indeed, cells with a mixed identity are exclusively located within either inner or outer hair cell layer or arise contiguously to pre-existing hair cells, suggesting that cell displacement is required for transdifferentiation. These results seem to faithfully reproduce those obtained using shRNA electroporations, showing evidence that inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling results in supporting cell translocation into hair cell layers and subsequent transdifferentiation. Similar results were obtained using an ephrin-B2-Fc inhibitor, reinforcing the idea that an ephrin-B2/EphA4-EphB signalling acts to segregate hair cells from supporting cells (Supplementary Fig. 10). However, either using shRNA-mediated gene silencing or soluble inhibitors, since translocating cells progressively lose the supporting cell marker p27kip1 while switching their own phenotype, it is likely that our results underestimate the rate of transdifferentiated cells due to the fraction of the latter cells that finally become undetectable. For instance, it appears that transdifferentiating supporting cells lose rapidly p27kip1 expression as they invade the hair cell layer but remain longer positive for sox2 (Fig. 4e,h,n and Supplementary Fig. 10), in agreement with the fact that sox2 is likely required for transdifferentiation of supporting cells to hair cells during regeneration39.

Figure 4: Blocking ephrin-B2 signalling results in supporting cell integration into either hair cell layer and switch in cell identity.

figure 4

In vitro organotypic assay using organs of Corti cultured in the presence of control (IgG-Fc, a–d) or soluble inhibitor EphA4-Fc (e–l) reagents. Triple immunolabelling for myosin-VII, p27kip1 and sox2. (a–d) In control condition, the organ of Corti exhibits sharp boundaries (dotted line in a–c) with cells displaying a clear and unique phenotype (myosin-VII+ or p27kip1+). (e–l) When blocking ephrin-B2 signalling, a subset of cells (yellow arrowheads) become simultaneously positive for myosin-VII, p27kip1 and sox2, both at the strial (SB) (e–h and magnifications) and modiolar (MB) boundaries (i–l). Myosin-VII and p27kip1 display opposite gradients of expression that are perpendicular to the SB (triangular shape on magnifications of f,g). Myosin-VII+ hair cell and p27kip1+ supporting cell populations cannot be easily segregated along either SB or MB (dotted curve on magnifications of e–g and i–k). As transdifferentiating myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ supporting cells (yellow arrowheads on magnifications of e–h) translocate into the hair cell layer, these cells reinforce their expression in myosin-VII while losing p27kip1 expression but remain longer positive for sox2 (blue arrowhead on magnifications of e–h). (m,n) The number of either myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ or myosin-VII+/p27kip1−/sox2+ cells per 100 μm of explant is significantly increased in the presence of EphA4-Fc compared with control condition (_n_=3 independent experiments for each condition; **_P_=0.0064 for myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ cells, *_P_=0.0362 for myosin-VII+/p27kip1−/sox2+ cells). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s _t_-test. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. Scale bar in a represents 10 μm in a–h and in i represents 2 μm in i–l. GER, greater epithelial ridge; HeCs, Hensen’s cells; IHCs, inner hair cells; OHCs, outer hair cells.

Full size image

Discussion

Here we demonstrate that manipulation of an ephrin gene expression boundary at early stages could be used as a new strategy for directly changing supporting cells into hair cells in the cochlea. We observed that disruption of ephrin-B2 signalling results in supporting cell translocation into hair cell layers and, in agreement with previous models about mechanisms of non-lineage boundary formation, switch in cell identity15,16,17 (Fig. 5b,c). This finding is also consistent with the fact that mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and transdifferentiate into hair cells36. Importantly, such change in cell fate exclusively occurs at the interface between hair cells and supporting cells, reinforcing the idea that transdifferentiation is a consequence of local inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling-mediated hair cell/supporting cell boundary. In this context, it is reasonable to wonder why supporting cells can transdifferentiate into hair cells and not the other way around. A possible explanation could be that supporting cells but not hair cells maintain sox2 expression, a transcription factor known to be required for transdifferentiation of supporting cells into hair cells during regeneration39. Nevertheless, how such cell fate change precisely occurs remains unclear. Interestingly, however, our results suggest that ephrin-B2 and Notch are expressed in similar supporting cell types throughout the development6. Therefore, as shown during vasculogenesis40,41, ephrin-B2 could be a downstream target of Notch signalling in supporting cells required to segregate the latter cells from adjacent hair cells. In support of this hypothesis, it was proposed that Notch signalling couples cell segregation and differentiation at hindbrain boundaries42,43. As a consequence, loss of a Notch pathway component could weaken the supporting cell fate and make easier the switch towards the hair cell phenotype. In normal condition, it is therefore likely that ephrin-B2 from supporting cells interacts with at least one of its specific receptors expressed by hair cells, such as EphA4 to maintain hair cells and supporting cells in distinct rows and compartments (Fig. 5a).

Figure 5: A model for how inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling induces supporting cell translocation into the hair cell layer and transdifferentiation.

figure 5

(a) Ephrin-B2 signalling maintains hair cells (HCs) and supporting cells (SCs) in distinct rows and compartments. (b,c) Mosaic ephrin-B2 silencing at the hair cell/supporting cell interface allows supporting cell to translocate into the hair cell layer while switching from supporting cell to hair cell fate (circled in red in c). (d) The former supporting cell has completely integrated the hair cell layer, lost supporting cell markers and become a fully differentiated hair cell (circled in red).

Full size image

Altogether, our results identified a new unexpected mechanism to directly convert supporting cell fate into hair cell fate. Interestingly, the fact that ephrin-B2 expression distinguishing hair cells from adjacent supporting cells persists in the post-hearing-onset cochlea could lead to strategies aimed at regenerating the sensory epithelium after partial or complete loss of hair cells. Beside most classical approaches showing that hair cells can be generated at random ectopic positions by Math1 overexpression44,45,46, such original strategy alternatively offers the advantage that newly generated hair cells directly integrate either hair cell layer (Fig. 5d), then would be likely more rapidly able to participate in functional circuitry.

Methods

Animals

Ephrin-B2 +/H2BGFP mice were generated as described18. GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox newborn mice were obtained from breeding of GFAP _+/cre_24 with ephrin-B2 lox/lox mice25. Mice were group-housed in the animal facility of the University of Liège under standard conditions with food and water ad libitum and were maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle. All animals were taken care in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and following the guidelines of the Belgian ministry of agriculture in agreement with EC laboratory animal care and use regulation (86/609/CEE, CE of J n°L358, 18 December 1986).

RNA in situ hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labelled ephrin-B2, EphA4, EphB1, EphB2 and EphB3 riboprobes10,47,48 as previously described49. Sections were air-dried, washed in PBS and post-fixed in paraformaldehyde. After treatment with 100 mM triethanolamine, pH 8, acetylated (by adding dropwise acetic anhydride 0.25%) while rocking 15 min at room temperature (RT), slides were washed three times in PBS-0.1% Tween-20 and pre-hybridized in pre-warmed hybridization cocktail 50% formamide (Amresco) at least 60 min at 70 °C. Afterwards, sections were hybridized with 800 ng ml−1 RNA probes overnight at 70 °C. Sections were then washed twice in pre-warmed washing buffer (50% formamide, 2 × sodium salt citrate, 0.1% Tween-20) for 60 min at 70 °C. Slides were pre-incubated for 1 h in blocking solution (Tris-Saline buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl) containing 10% Normal Goat Serum (Dako)) at RT and subsequently incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-digoxigenin antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase (1:2,000, Roche Applied Science) diluted in blocking solution. After three washes with Tris-Saline buffer, sections were finally overlaid with 200 μl filtered NBT/BCIP (Nitro Blue Tetrazolium/5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3-Indolyl Phosphate) −0.1% Tween-20 solution (Sigma-Aldrich) between coverslips in dark and at RT until the signal appears. Slides were then washed, post-fixed and mounted in aquamount medium (BDH laboratories).

ShRNA-expressing constructs and electroporation

Four purified target siRNA duplexes directed against distinct sites in the ephrin-B2 transcript (designed by Dharmacon RNAi Technologies) and one irrelevant siRNA were transfected into N2A cells using Lipofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) and further cultured for 48 h. To assess the knockdown efficiency, proteins were isolated and analysed by western blotting using ephrin-B2 antibody (rabbit IgG, 1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Bands were compared at expected molecular weight of 55 kDa (ref. 50; Supplementary Fig. 5). Based on these results, the two following sequences were then annealed and subcloned into modified pCA-b-EGFPm5 silencer 3 vector34—ephrin-B2 siRNA 01, 5′-CCAAAUUUCUACCCGGACA-3′ and ephrin-B2 siRNA 02, 5′-GCAUAUUUGUGCCGUAAUU-3′. Primers for sequencing were purchased from Eurogentec SA. In situ knockdown efficiency of shRNAs was assessed using ephrin-B2 antibody (goat IgG, 1:100, R&D Systems) after electroporation.

Cochleae were dissected from E16 mice, transferred in a sterile Petri dish and injected at the apex with a solution containing 2 μg μl−1 of plasmid DNA, PBS-10% glucose and Fast-Green (Sigma-Aldrich) using pulled borosilicate needles and Femtojet microinjector (VWR). Before electroporation, the central axis of the cochlea was carefully oriented perpendicular to the electrodes (Sonidel). Eight electrical pulses were then applied at 30 V (50 ms duration) with 500 ms intervals using ECM-830 BTX square wave electroporator (BTX, Gentronic). Explants were dissected and cultured for 4 days. Tissues were then fixed in 4% Paraformaldehyde, washed in PBS and immunolabelled.

In vitro organotypic assay

Organs of Corti were isolated from E16 mouse cochleae and cultured onto Millicell Culture Insert (Millipore) in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with glucose (final concentration 6 g l−1) and N1 additives (insulin (5 μg ml−1) transferrin (5 μg ml−1 putrescin (10−4 M), progesterone (2 × 10−8 M) and selenium ((Na2SeO3) 3 × 10−8 M)). Explants were treated with either IgG-Fc fragment as control, recombinant mouse EphA4-Fc or ephrin-B2-Fc chimera (20 μg ml−1; R&D Systems), during 4 days.

Tissue processing and immunostainings

Sections, whole-mount cochleae or explants were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies directed against GFP (rabbit IgG, 1:200; Torrey Pines Biolabs), parvalbumin (mouse IgG1, clone PARV-19, 1:250; Sigma-Aldrich), myosin-VII (rabbit IgG, 1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p27kip1 (mouse IgG1, 1:250; BD Biosciences), sox2 (goat IgG, 1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), active caspase-3 (rabbit IgG, 1:250; Promega) or neurofilament H (rat IgG, clone TA51, 1:1,000; Millipore). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-phalloidin (1:500; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as an F-actin marker. Tissues were then incubated for 1 h with either Rhodamine Red X-, FITC- or Cy5-conjugated goat anti-mouse, anti-rabbit or anti-rat IgGs secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories).

Confocal microscopy, image analysis and quantification

Confocal fluorescence images were acquired using the Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal system (Olympus Europa GmbH). Unless otherwise mentioned, fields were acquired using Z-scan, with a step of 0.5 μm between each confocal plane in order to create orthogonal projections when needed. For comparison between culture conditions, all preparations were analysed at the same time, using the same acquisition parameters.

To compare the number of parvalbumin+ extra inner and outer hair cells and the number of parvalbumin+/sox2+ hair cells on whole-mount cochleae from newborn WT and GFAP +/cre ;ephrin-B2 lox/lox mice, three regions measuring at least 300 μm and corresponding to apical, middle and basal turns of the cochlea were considered for quantification. Values were expressed as a mean number of cells per 100 μm. Data were statistically analysed using a Student’s _t_-test. _P-_values <0.05 were considered significant (*P<0.05).

To assess the proportion of transfected supporting cells that are believed displaced towards the hair cell compartment, we only considered supporting cells directly adjacent to hair cells. We evaluated the percentage of EGFP+/p27kip1+/myosin-VII+ cells among the total amount of EGFP+/p27kip1+ at the hair cell/supporting cell interface. EGFP+ cells were considered transdifferentiating when at least half of the p27kip1+ nucleus was surrounded by myosin-VII+ labelling in the three axes. For each transfection, all the EGFP+/p27kip1+ cells observed at the hair cell/supporting cell interface were considered for the statistical analysis. Each statistical value represents a mean of three independent experiments (Supplementary Fig. S6). Data were statistically analysed using a Student’s _t_-test. _P-_value <0.05 was considered significant (**P<0.01).

For each control IgG-Fc, EphA4-Fc or ephrin-B2-Fc condition, we quantified and compared the number of myosin-VII+/p27kip1+/sox2+ and myosin-VII+/p27kip1−/sox2+ cells in explants after 4 days in culture. Three regions measuring at least 300 μm and corresponding to apical, middle and basal turns of the cochlea were taken into account for quantification. Cells were considered transdifferentiating when at least half of the p27kip1+ and/or sox2+ nucleus was surrounded by myosin-VII+ labelling in the three axes. Values were expressed as a mean number of cells per 100 μm. Each statistical value represents a mean of three independent experiments. Data were statistically analysed using a Student’s _t_-test. _P-_values <0.05 were considered significant (*P<0.05; **P<0.01).

Additional information

How to cite this article: Defourny, J. et al. Cochlear supporting cell transdifferentiation and integration into hair cell layers by inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling. Nat. Commun. 6:7017 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8017 (2015).

References

  1. Chen, P. & Segil, N. p27(Kip1) links cell proliferation to morphogenesis in the developing organ of Corti. Development 126, 1581–1590 (1999).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Sage, C. et al. Proliferation of functional hair cells in vivo in the absence of the retinoblastoma protein. Science 307, 1114–1118 (2005).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Kelley, M. W. Regulation of cell fate in the sensory epithelia of the inner ear. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 837–849 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Edge, A. S. & Chen, Z. Y. Hair cell regeneration. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 377–382 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  5. Adam, J. et al. Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development 125, 4645–4654 (1998).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Lanford, P. J. et al. Notch signalling pathway mediates hair cell development in mammalian cochlea. Nature Genet. 21, 289–292 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Daudet, N. & Lewis, J. Two contrasting roles for Notch activity in chick inner ear development: specification of prosensory patches and lateral inhibition of hair-cell differentiation. Development 132, 541–551 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Mizutari, K. et al. Notch inhibition induces cochlear hair cell regeneration and recovery of hearing after acoustic trauma. Neuron 77, 58–69 (2013).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  9. Gale, N. W. et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses and are reciprocally compartmentalized during embryogenesis. Neuron 17, 9–19 (1996).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Smith, A., Robinson, V., Patel, K. & Wilkinson, D. G. The EphA4 and EphB1 receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrin-B2 ligand regulate targeted migration of branchial neural crest cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 561–570 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Durbin, L. et al. Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. Genes Dev. 12, 3096–3109 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77–81 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. & Wilkinson, D. G. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399, 267–271 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Kemp, H. A., Cooke, J. E. & Moens, C. B. EphA4 and EfnB2a maintain rhombomere coherence by independently regulating intercalation of progenitor cells in the zebrafish neural keel. Dev. Biol. 327, 313–326 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Cooke, J. E. & Moens, C. B. Boundary formation in the hindbrain: Eph only it were simple. Trends Neurosci. 25, 260–267 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Dahmann, C., Oates, A. C. & Brand, M. Boundary formation and maintenance in tissue development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 43–55 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. G. Boundary formation in the development of the vertebrate hindbrain. WIREs Dev. Biol 2, 735–745 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Davy, A. & Soriano, P. Ephrin-B2 forward signalling regulates somite patterning and neural crest cell development. Dev. Biol. 304, 182–193 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Dabdoub, A. et al. Sox2 signaling in prosensory domain specification and subsequent hair cell differentiation in the developing cochlea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18396–18401 (2008).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Bianchi, L. M. & Gale, N. W. Distribution of Eph-related molecules in the developing and mature cochlea. Hear. Res. 117, 161–172 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Bianchi, L. M. & Liu, H. Comparison of ephrin-A ligand and EphA receptor distribution in the developing inner ear. Anat. Rec. 254, 127–134 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Defourny, J., Lallemend, F. & Malgrange, B. Structure and development of cochlear afferent innervation in mammals. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 301, C750–C761 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Miko, I. J., Henkemeyer, M. & Cramer, K. S. Auditory brainstem responses are impaired in EphA4 and ephrin-B2 deficient mice. Hear. Res. 235, 39–46 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Bajenaru, M. L. et al. Astrocyte-specific inactivation of the neurofibromatosis 1 gene (NF1) is insufficient for astrocytoma formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5100–5113 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  25. Grunwald, I. C. et al. Hippocampal plasticity requires postsynaptic ephrinBs. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 33–40 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Rio, C., Dikkes, P., Liberman, M. C. & Corfas, G. Glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and promoter activity in the inner ear of developing and adult mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 442, 156–162 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Smeti, I. et al. Expression of candidate markers for stem/progenitor cells in the inner ears of developing and adult GFAP and nestin promoter-GFP transgenic mice. Gene Expr. Patterns 11, 22–32 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Yang, D., Thalmann, I., Thalmann, R. & Simmons, D. D. Expression of alpha and beta parvalbumin is differentially regulated in the rat organ of corti during development. J. Neurobiol. 58, 479–492 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Ahmed, M. et al. Eya1-Six1 interaction is sufficient to induce hair cell fate in the cochlea by activating Atoh1 expression in cooperation with Sox2. Dev. Cell 22, 377–390 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  30. Compagni, A., Logan, M., Klein, R. & Adams, R. H. Control of skeletal patterning by ephrinB1-EphB interactions. Dev. Cell 5, 217–230 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Twigg, S. R. et al. Mutations of ephrin-B1 (EFNB1), a marker of tissue boundary formation, cause craniofrontonasal syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8652–8657 (2004).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  32. Davy, A., Bush, J. O. & Soriano, P. Inhibition of gap junction communication at ectopic Eph/ephrin boundaries underlies craniofrontonasal syndrome. PLoS Biol. 4, e315 (2006).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  33. Pasquale, E. B. Eph receptor signalling casts a wide net on cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 462–475 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Creppe, C. et al. Elongator controls the migration and differentiation of cortical neurons through acetylation of alpha-tubulin. Cell 136, 551–564 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Hasson, T., Heintzelman, M. B., Santos-Sacchi, J., Corey, D. P. & Mooseker, M. S. Expression in cochlea and retina of myosin VIIa, the gene product defective in Usher syndrome type 1B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9815–9819 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  36. White, P. M., Doetzlhofer, A., Lee, Y. S., Groves, A. K. & Segil, N. Mammalian cochlear supporting cells can divide and trans-differentiate into hair cells. Nature 441, 984–987 (2006).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Savary, E. et al. Distinct population of hair cell progenitors can be isolated from the postnatal mouse cochlea using side population analysis. Stem Cells 25, 332–339 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Qin, H. et al. Structural characterization of the EphA4-Ephrin-B2 complex reveals new features enabling Eph-ephrin binding promiscuity. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 644–654 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Millimaki, B. B., Sweet, E. M. & Riley, B. B. Sox2 is required for maintenance and regeneration, but not initial development, of hair cells in the zebrafish inner ear. Dev. Biol. 338, 262–269 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Adams, R. H. & Alitalo, K. Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 464–478 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Swift, M. R. & Weinstein, B. M. Arterial-venous specification during development. Circ. Res. 104, 576–588 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Cheng, Y. C. et al. Notch activation regulates the segregation and differentiation of rhombomere boundary cells in the zebrafish hindbrain. Dev. Cell 6, 539–550 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Tossell, K., Kiecker, C., Wizenmann, A., Lang, E. & Irving, C. Notch signalling stabilises boundary formation at the midbrain-hindbrain organiser. Development 138, 3745–3757 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. Kawamoto, K., Ishimoto, S., Minoda, R., Brough, D. E. & Raphael, Y. Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo. J. Neurosci. 23, 4395–4400 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  45. Kelly, M. C., Chang, Q., Pan, A., Lin, X. & Chen, P. Atoh1 directs the formation of sensory mosaics and induces cell proliferation in the postnatal mammalian cochlea in vivo. J. Neurosci. 32, 6699–6710 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Zheng, J. L. & Gao, W. Q. Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 580–586 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Nieto, M. A., Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P., Charnay, P. & Wilkinson, D. G. A receptor protein tyrosine kinase implicated in the segmental patterning of the hindbrain and mesoderm. Development 116, 1137–1150 (1992).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Becker, N. et al. Several receptor tyrosine kinase genes of the Eph family are segmentally expressed in the developing hindbrain. Mech. Dev. 47, 3–17 (1994).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Defourny, J. et al. Ephrin-A5/EphA4 signalling controls specific afferent targeting to cochlear hair cells. Nat. Commun 4, 1438 (2013).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Vincent, F. et al. Angiotensinogen delays angiogenesis and tumor growth of hepatocarcinoma in transgenic mice. Cancer Res. 69, 2853–2860 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS), the Belgian Science Policy (IUAP-VII network P7/07 and the Fonds Leon Fredericq (FLF, Faculty of Medicine-University of Liege). We thank the GIGA-Cell Imaging platform and R. Klein for providing the ephrin-B2 lox/lox mice. J.D. was supported by the FLF and the Fonds pour la formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et l’Agriculture (FRIA). L.N. is funded by the Walloon excellence in lifesciences and biotechnology (WELBIO). L.N. and B.M. are, respectively, research associate and research director from FNRS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GIGA-Neurosciences, Developmental Neurobiology Unit, University of Liège, C.H.U. B36, B-4000 Liège, Belgium,
    Jean Defourny, Susana Mateo Sánchez, Laurent Nguyen & Brigitte Malgrange
  2. Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Neurology, VIB - Vesalius Research Center, Laboratory of Neurobiology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
    Lies Schoonaert & Wim Robberecht
  3. Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
    Wim Robberecht
  4. Center for Developmental Biology, University of Toulouse, CNRS, CBD UMR 5547, Toulouse 9, F-31062, France
    Alice Davy

Authors

  1. Jean Defourny
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Susana Mateo Sánchez
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Lies Schoonaert
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Wim Robberecht
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Alice Davy
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Laurent Nguyen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Brigitte Malgrange
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.D. designed the research; J.D. and S.M.S. performed the research; L.S., W.R., A.D. and L.N. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; J.D. wrote the paper and B.M. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toBrigitte Malgrange.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Defourny, J., Mateo Sánchez, S., Schoonaert, L. et al. Cochlear supporting cell transdifferentiation and integration into hair cell layers by inhibition of ephrin-B2 signalling.Nat Commun 6, 7017 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8017

Download citation