Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer: management and controversies (original) (raw)

Nature Clinical Practice Urology volume 2, pages 32–37 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although surgery achieves excellent local control, within 5 years almost 50% of patients relapse and subsequently progress to develop systemic disease. Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is sensitive to chemotherapy. Although platinum-based chemotherapy can produce relatively high overall response rates, the impact on the survival of patients with advanced disease has, at best, been limited. Randomized trials of cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens in the neoadjuvant setting have demonstrated the potential to improve survival. By comparison, adjuvant studies have been plagued by suboptimal trial design, limited patient numbers, and lack of standardization of the chemotherapy regimens used. With the introduction of new cytotoxic drugs and novel small molecules, there is a need for well-designed studies to address the optimal utility of perioperative therapy in high-risk patients with bladder cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$189.00 per year

only $15.75 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A et al. (2004) Cancer Statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 54: 8–29
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Gschwend J et al. (2000) Radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: contemporary results and remaining controversies. Eur Urol 38: 121–130
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Stein JP et al. (2001) Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 19: 667–675
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Hall RR et al. (2002) Updated results of a randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer [abstract 710]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21: 178a
    Google Scholar
  5. Poulson A et al. (1998) Radical cystectomy: extending limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. J Urol 165: 2015–2019
    Google Scholar
  6. Herr H et al. (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167: 1295–1298
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Bajorin D et al. (1999) Long-term survival in metastatic transitional cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy. J Clin Oncol 17: 3173–3181
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Schag CC et al. (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2: 187–193
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Dreicer R et al. (1993) Neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term followup. J Urol 150: 849–852
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Schultz P et al. (1994) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: prognostic factors for survival of patients treated with M-VAC with 5-year follow-up. J Clin Oncol 12: 1394–1401
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Ghersi D et al. (1995) Does neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improve the survival of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials. Br J Urol 75: 206–213
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Malmstrom P et al. (1996) Five-year followup of a prospective trial of radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Nordic Cystectomy Trial I. The Nordic Cooperative Bladder Cancer Study Group. J Urol 155: 1903–1906
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Sherif A et al. (2002) Neoadjuvant cisplatin–methotrexate chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer–nordic cystectomy trial 2. Scan J Urol Nephrol 36: 419–425
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Bassi P et al. (1999) Neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy of invasive bladder cancer: results of a multicenter phase III trial [abstract 1021]. J Urol 161: 264
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Cortesi E (1995) Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced bladder cancer: A randomized prospective clinical trial [abstract 623]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15: 237
    Google Scholar
  16. Millikan R et al. (2001) Integrated therapy for locally advanced bladder cancer: final report of a randomized trial of cystectomy plus adjuvant M-VAC versus cystectomy with both preoperative and postoperative M-VAC. J Clin Oncol 19: 4005–4013
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Abol-Enein H et al. (1997) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of invasive transitional cell bladder cancer: A controlled prospective randomized study. Br J Urol 79 (Suppl 4): 43
    Google Scholar
  18. International Collaboration of Trialists (1999) Neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrextate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 354: 533–540
  19. Grossman H et al. (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med 349: 859–866
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 361: 1927–1934
  21. Cordon-Cardo C (2004) p53 and RB: Simple interesting correlates or tumor markers of critical predictive nature? J Clin Oncol 22: 975–977
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Skinner D et al. (1991) The role of adjuvant chemotherapy following cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: a prospective comparative trial. J Urol 145: 459–464
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Stockle M et al. (1992) Advanced bladder cancer (stages pT3b, pT4a, pN1 and pN2): improved survival after radical cystectomy and 3 adjuvant cycles of chemotherapy. Results of a controlled prospective study. J Urol 148: 302–306
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Freiha F et al. (1996) A randomized trial of radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy plus cisplatin, vinblastine and methotrexate chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 155: 495–500
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Small E et al. (2003) Overview of bladder cancer trials in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. Cancer 97 (Suppl 8): 2090–2098
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology and Oncology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
    Jorge A Garcia & Robert Dreicer
  2. Taussig Cancer Center of the The Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
    Jorge A Garcia & Robert Dreicer

Authors

  1. Jorge A Garcia
  2. Robert Dreicer

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRobert Dreicer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, J., Dreicer, R. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer: management and controversies.Nat Rev Urol 2, 32–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0068

Download citation

This article is cited by