Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects (original) (raw)

References

  1. IPCC Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. ) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014); http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
    Google Scholar
  2. Riahi, K. et al. Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Econ. 26, 539–564 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Carbon Capture and Storage: Mobilising Private Sector Finance for CCS in the UK (Energy Technologies Institute and Ecofin Research Foundation, 2014); http://go.nature.com/DUo6fn
  4. Aldy, J. E. et al. Designing climate mitigation policy. J. Econ. Lit. 48, 903–934 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Jacobsson, S. & Bergek, A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Ind. Corp. Change 13, 815–849 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Frishammar, J., Söderholm, P., Bäckström, K., Hellsmark, H. & Ylinenpää, H. The role of pilot and demonstration plants in technological development: synthesis and directions for future research. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 27, 1–18 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Russell, S., Markusson, N. & Scott, V. What will CCS demonstrations demonstrate?. Mitig. Adapt. Strategic Glob. Change 3, 105–111 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  8. The Global Status of CCS: 2014 (Global CCS Institute, 2014).
  9. The Potential for Reducing the Costs of CCS in the UK (UK CCS Cost Reduction Task Force, 2013); http://go.nature.com/I4ppJQ
  10. IPCC IPCC Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H., Loos, M. & Meyer, L. ) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005); http://go.nature.com/WBun8Q
    Google Scholar
  11. Katzer, J. et al. The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon-Constrained World (MIT, 2007).
    Google Scholar
  12. Markusson, N., Ishii, A. & Stephens, J. C. The social and political complexities of learning in carbon capture and storage demonstration projects. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 293–302 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Herzog, H. J. Scaling up carbon dioxide capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons. Energy Econ. 33, 597–604 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Torp, T. A. & Gale, J. Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: the Sleipner and SACS projects. Energy 29, 1361–1369 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Orr, F. M. & Taber, J. J. Use of carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery. Science 224, 563–569 (1984).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Rochelle, G. T. Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 325, 1652–1654 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Scrase, I. & Watson, J. in Caching the Carbon (eds Meadowcroft, J. R. & Langhelle, O. ) Ch. 7 (Edward Elgar, 2009).
    Google Scholar
  18. Monea, M. SaskPower's case for carbon capture and storage. Cornerstone 3, 17–19 (2015).
    Google Scholar
  19. Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage (International Energy Agency, 2009); http://go.nature.com/ypCuIa
  20. Baker, E., Bosetti, V. Anadon, L. D., Henrion, M. & Aleluia Reis, L. Future costs of key low-carbon energy technologies: harmonization and aggregation of energy technology expert elicitation data. Energy Policy 80, 219–232 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Kramer, G. J. & Haigh, M. No quick switch to low-carbon energy. Nature 462, 568–569 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Gibbins, J. & Chalmers, H. Preparing for global rollout: a ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment. Energy Policy 36, 501–507 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Torvanger, A. & Meadowcroft, J. The political economy of technology support: Making decisions about carbon capture and storage and low carbon energy technologies. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 303–312 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher, K. S., Anadon, L. D., Kempener, R. & Wilson, C. Trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration. WIREs Clim. Change 2, 373–396 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Jamasb, T., Nuttall, W. J., Pollitt, M. & Maratou, A. in Delivering a Low-Carbon Electricity System: Technologies, Economics, and Policy (eds Grubb, M., Jamasb, T. & Pollitt, M. G. ) Ch. 3 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008).
    Google Scholar
  26. Verbong, G., Geels, F. W. & Raven, R. Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 20, 555–573 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Menanteau, P. Learning from variety and competition between technological options for generating photovoltaic electricity. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 63, 63–80 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Reiner, D. M. & Liang, X. Stakeholder views on financing carbon capture and storage demonstration projects in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 643–651 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, E., Zhang, D. & Zheng, L. The socio-political context for deploying CCS in China and the U.S. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 324–335 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Babiker, M. H. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J. Int. Econ. 65, 421–445 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Markusson, N. et al. A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 79, 903–918 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Brown, J. & Hendry, C. Public demonstration projects and field trials: Accelerating commercialisation of sustainable technology in solar photovoltaics. Energy Policy 37, 2560–2573 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Harborne, P. & Hendry, C. Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process. Energy Policy 37, 3580–3595 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Markusson, N. & Chalmers, H. Characterising CCS learning: The role of quantitative methods and alternative approaches. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80, 1409–1417 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Cowan, R. Nuclear power reactors: a study in technological lock-in. J. Econ. Hist. 50, 541–567 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Shackley, S. & Thompson, M. Lost in the mix: will the technologies of carbon dioxide capture and storage provide us with a breathing space as we strive to make the transition from fossil fuels to renewables? Climatic Change 110, 101–121 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Sagar, A. D. & van der Zwaan, B. Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy 34, 2601–2608 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Rubin, E. S., Azevedo, I. M., Jaramillo, P. & Yeh, S. A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies. Energy Policy 86, 198–218 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. de Coninck, H., Stephens, J. C. & Metz, B. Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 37, 2161–2165 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Georghiou, L. Global cooperation in research. Res. Pol. 27, 611–626 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Victor, D. G. Toward effective international cooperation on climate change: Numbers, interests and institutions. Glob. Environ. Politics 6, 90–103 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Technology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage (International Energy Agency, 2013); http://go.nature.com/k7Box3
  43. Harborne, P., Hendry, C. & Brown, J. The development and diffusion of radical technological innovation: The role of bus demonstration projects in commercializing fuel cell technology. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 19, 167–188 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Winskel, M. et al. Learning pathways for energy supply technologies: Bridging between innovation studies and learning rates. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 96–114 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E. & Herzog, H. J. The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 40, 378–400 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Kern, F., Gaede, J., Meadowcroft, J. & Watson, J. The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change http://doi.org/9k7 (in the press).
  47. Lupion, M. & Herzog, H. J. NER300: Lessons learnt in attempting to secure CCS projects in Europe. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 19, 19–25 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Arranz, A. M. Carbon capture and storage: Frames and blind spots. Energy Policy 82, 249–259 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Year in review – CCS on the move. (Bellona Europa, 10 December 2014); http://go.nature.com/jBRt13
  50. Stephens, J. C. Time to stop CCS investments and end government subsidies of fossil fuels. WIREs Clim. Change 5, 169–173 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Maddali, V., Tularam, G. A., Glynn, P. Economic and time-sensitive issues surrounding CCS: A policy analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8959–8968 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H. & Haszeldine, R. S. Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Clim. Change 3, 105–111 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. & van Lente, H. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strategic Manage. 18, 285–298 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  54. EU Demonstration Programme for CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS): ZEP's Proposal (European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants, 2009); http://go.nature.com/wU3wQp
  55. van Alphen, K., van Ruijven, J., Kasa, S., Hekkert, M. & Turkenburg, W. The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy 37, 43–55 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Clean Coal: DOE's Decision to Restructure FutureGen Should Be Based on a Comprehensive Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Risks (General Accounting Office, 2009); http://go.nature.com/kH6Mx4

Download references