Angiogenesis inhibitors revised and revived at AACR (original) (raw)
- News
- Published: 01 May 2002
Nature Medicine volume 8, page 427 (2002) Cite this article
- 304 Accesses
- 16 Citations
- Metrics details
There are currently 80 anti-angiogenic agents in clinical trials that have enrolled over 10,000 patients. The first cancer trials of anti-angiogenic agents were met with considerable anticipation, as these drugs had proven highly effective in treating cancer in mice. Dana–Farber and a group of affiliated hospitals began the first clinical study of endostatin in 1999. The first phase of the study was completed two years later, when doctors announced that patients receiving endostatin experienced few side effects and that tumor growth was stabilized.
But anti-angiogenic drugs had already been the topic of fierce public debate. In May 1998, their human potential was hyped in a New York Times article based on data from animal studies, which triggered some researchers to report their difficulties in reproducing experimental results in mice. Skepticism arose in scientific, clinical, pharmaceutical and financial circles, and cancer patients were confused by the conflicting information. Ultimately, the studies revealed that endostatin, as well as other inhibitors such as TNP-470, thalidomide, IM862, Neovastat, Angiozyme, and Combretastatin A4 Pro-drug, did cause tumor shrinkage in a few patients, although most patients experienced only tumor stabilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- San Francisco
Kristine Novak
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Novak, K. Angiogenesis inhibitors revised and revived at AACR.Nat Med 8, 427 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0502-427
- Issue date: 01 May 2002
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0502-427