UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads (original) (raw)

Nature Methods volume 10, pages 996–998 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Amplified marker-gene sequences can be used to understand microbial community structure, but they suffer from a high level of sequencing and amplification artifacts. The UPARSE pipeline reports operational taxonomic unit (OTU) sequences with ≤1% incorrect bases in artificial microbial community tests, compared with >3% incorrect bases commonly reported by other methods. The improved accuracy results in far fewer OTUs, consistently closer to the expected number of species in a community.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
  2. Lundberg, D.S. et al. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Bokulich, N.A. et al. Nat. Methods 10, 57–59 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Quince, C. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 639–641 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Reeder, J. & Knight, R. Nat. Methods 7, 668–669 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Quince, C., Lanzen, A., Davenport, R.J. & Turnbaugh, P.J. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 38 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Edgar, R.C., Haas, B.J., Clemente, J.C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Huse, S.M., Welch, D.M., Morrison, H.G. & Sogin, M.L. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1889–1898 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Schloss, P.D., Gevers, D. & Westcott, S.L. PLoS ONE 6, e27310 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Caporaso, J.G. et al. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R. Numerical Taxonomy (W.H. Freeman, 1973).
  12. Haas, B.J. et al. Genome Res. 21, 494–504 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Nature 486, 215–221 (2012).
  14. Ihrmark, K. et al. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 666–677 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. DeSantis, T.Z. et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Masella, A.P., Bartram, A.K., Truszkowski, J.M., Brown, D.G. & Neufeld, J.D. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 31 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Sayers, E.W. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D13–D25 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks N.A. Bokulich, J.G. Caporaso and D. Gevers for helpful discussions and providing prepublication data; P.D. Schloss for assistance with mothur; C. Quince for assistance with AmpliconNoise; L. Dethlefsen and S.M. Huse for helpful discussions; S. Yourstone for an insightful critique of a draft manuscript; and the Sloan Foundation, Microbiology of the Built Environment Program (M.L. Sogin, Marine Biological Laboratory) for providing compute resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Investigator, Tiburon, California, USA
    Robert C Edgar

Authors

  1. Robert C Edgar
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.C.E. conceived of the study, performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRobert C Edgar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Edgar, R. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads.Nat Methods 10, 996–998 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604

Download citation

This article is cited by