Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics (original) (raw)

Nature Methods volume 6, pages 717–719 (2009)Cite this article

The potential of mass spectrometry–based proteomics to advance biology and biomedicine is nearly unlimited but so is its potential for generating bad data. Apart from the pursuit of technological progress in protocols and instruments, stringent comparative analyses of different approaches are critical for fully developing the discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1

iStockphoto

Figure 2

References

  1. Mann, M. & Kelleher, N.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18132–18138 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Olsen, J.V., Ong, S.E. & Mann, M. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 608–614 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. Nat. Methods 4, 207–217 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Kim, S., Gupta, N. & Pevzner, P.A. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3354–3363 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Elias, J.E., Haas, W., Faherty, B.K. & Gygi, S.P. Nat. Methods 2, 667–675 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Perkins, D.N. Pappin, D.J.C., Creasy, D.M. & Cottrell, J.S. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L. & Yates, J.R. III J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Cox, J. & Mann, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Bodenmiller, B. Mueller, L.N., Mueller, M., Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Nat. Methods 4, 231–237 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Olsen, J.V. et al. Cell 127, 635–648 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Bodenmiller, B. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 139 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Hilger, M. Bonaldi, T., Gnad, F. & Mann, M. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 1908–1920 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Bonaldi, T. et al. Mol. Cell 31, 762–772 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Bell, A.W. et al. Nat. Methods 6, 423–430 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. de Godoy, L.M. et al. Nature 455, 1251–1254 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Addona, T.A. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 633–641 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Kumar, C. & Mann, M. FEBS Lett. 583, 1703–1712 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Matthias Mann is at the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Matrinsried, Germany. mmann@biochem.mpg.de,
    Matthias Mann

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mann, M. Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics.Nat Methods 6, 717–719 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1009-717

Download citation

This article is cited by