Cocaine-induced structural plasticity in frontal cortex correlates with conditioned place preference (original) (raw)

Nature Neuroscience volume 16, pages 1367–1369 (2013) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Contextual cues associated with previous drug exposure can trigger drug craving and seeking, and form a substantial obstacle in substance use recovery. Using in vivo imaging in mice, we found that cocaine administration induced a rapid increase in the formation and accumulation of new dendritic spines, and that measures of new persistent spine gain correlated with cocaine conditioned place preference. Our data suggest that new persistent spine formation in the frontal cortex may be involved in stimulant-related learning driving appetitive behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Cocaine exposure increases spine gains in the frontal cortex.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Cocaine increases spine gains in the frontal cortex within 2 h of injection.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: New persistent spine gains after cocaine CPP training correlate with the magnitude of gain in preference for the cocaine-paired context.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLaughlin, J. & See, R.E. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 168, 57–65 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Pierce, R.C., Reeder, D.C., Hicks, J., Morgan, Z.R. & Kalivas, P.W. Neuroscience 82, 1103–1114 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Tai, L.H., Lee, A.M., Benavidez, N., Bonci, A. & Wilbrecht, L. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1281–1289 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Chudasama, Y. & Robbins, T.W. Biol. Psychol. 73, 19–38 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Robinson, T.E., Gorny, G., Mitton, E. & Kolb, B. Synapse 39, 257–266 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Robinson, T.E. & Kolb, B. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 1598–1604 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Robinson, T.E. & Kolb, B. Neuropharmacology 47, 33–46 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Feng, G. et al. Neuron 28, 41–51 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Hofer, S.B., Mrsic-Flogel, T.D., Bonhoeffer, T. & Hübener, M. Nature 457, 313–317 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Wilbrecht, L., Holtmaat, A., Wright, N., Fox, K. & Svoboda, K. J. Neurosci. 30, 4927–4932 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  11. Xu, T. et al. Nature 462, 915–919 (2009).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Kasai, H., Matsuzaki, M., Noguchi, J., Yasumatsu, N. & Nakahara, H. Trends Neurosci. 26, 360–368 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Bourne, J. & Harris, K.M. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17, 381–386 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Holtmaat, A.J.G.D. et al. Neuron 45, 279–291 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Zuo, Y., Lin, A., Chang, P. & Gan, W.-B. Neuron 46, 181–189 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Knott, G.W., Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Welker, E. & Svoboda, K. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1117–1124 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Holtmaat, A. et al. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1128–1144 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Whistler, P. Janak, S. Jurado, C. Johnson and C. Bates for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029150), the State of California, University of California San Francisco, and the P. Royer and K. Clayton Family.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
    Francisco Javier Muñoz-Cuevas, Jegath Athilingam, Denise Piscopo & Linda Wilbrecht
  2. Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA
    Denise Piscopo
  3. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA
    Linda Wilbrecht

Authors

  1. Francisco Javier Muñoz-Cuevas
  2. Jegath Athilingam
  3. Denise Piscopo
  4. Linda Wilbrecht

Contributions

F.J.M.-C., J.A. and D.P. performed the experiments. L.W. and F.J.M.-C. designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLinda Wilbrecht.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muñoz-Cuevas, F., Athilingam, J., Piscopo, D. et al. Cocaine-induced structural plasticity in frontal cortex correlates with conditioned place preference.Nat Neurosci 16, 1367–1369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3498

Download citation

This article is cited by