The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action (original) (raw)

Nature Neuroscience volume 10, pages 817–818 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

We assessed the role of the human mirror neuron system (MNS) in complementary actions using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants prepared to execute imitative or complementary actions. The BOLD signal in the right inferior frontal gyrus and bilateral inferior parietal lobes was greater during preparation of complementary than during imitative actions, suggesting that the MNS may be essential in dynamically coupling action observation to action execution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. Exp. Brain Res. 91, 176–180 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. & Rizzolatti, G. Brain 119, 593–609 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Fogassi, L. et al. Science 308, 662–667 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Iacoboni, M. et al. Science 286, 2526–2528 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J. & Mazziotta, J.C. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 1123–1128 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. & Rizzolatti, G. J. Neurophysiol. 73, 2608–2611 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, A.F. & Grafton, S.T. J. Neurosci. 26, 1133–1137 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Buccino, G. et al. Neuron 42, 323–334 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Koski, L. et al. Cereb. Cortex 12, 847–855 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Schutz-Bosbach, S., Mancini, B., Aglioti, A.M. & Haggard, P. Curr. Biol. 16, 1830–1834 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Brass, M. & Heyes, C. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 489–495 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Iacoboni, M. & Dapretto, M. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 942–951 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by the EU-Project Joint Action Science and Technology (IST-FP6-003747).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, Nijmegen, 6500 HE, The Netherlands
    Roger D Newman-Norlund, Hein T van Schie, Alexander M J van Zuijlen & Harold Bekkering
  2. FC Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
    Roger D Newman-Norlund & Harold Bekkering

Authors

  1. Roger D Newman-Norlund
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hein T van Schie
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Alexander M J van Zuijlen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Harold Bekkering
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.D.N.-N. and A.M.J.v.Z. conducted the experiment and analyzed the data. R.D.N.-N. wrote the manuscript with contributions from A.M.J.v.Z., H.T.v.S and H.B. The project was supervised by H.B.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toRoger D Newman-Norlund.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Experimental stimuli and time course. (PDF 40 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Locations in MNI coordinates and labels of brain areas involved in complementary actions in the current experiment. (PDF 9 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Locations (in MNI coordinates) and Brodmann's labels (BA) for brain areas in which BOLD signal was significantly associated with facilitation effects (that is, fast responses – slow responses) observed in imitative and complementary contexts. (PDF 11 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newman-Norlund, R., van Schie, H., van Zuijlen, A. et al. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action.Nat Neurosci 10, 817–818 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1911

Download citation

This article is cited by