Rajamannan, N. M. et al. Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research from the national heart and lung and blood institute aortic stenosis working group executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease — 2011 update. Circulation124, 1783–1791 (2011). A good review of the state of knowledge and future research directions for calcific aortic valve disease (in 2011). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Go, A. S. et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics — 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation127, 143–152 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Nishimura, R. A. et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, e57–e185 (2014). The most recent version of the clinical guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, including AS. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Vahanian, A. et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease Joint Task Force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur. Heart J.33, 2451–2496 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Roberts, W. C. & Ko, J. M. Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation. Circulation111, 920–925 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bosse, Y., Mathieu, P. & Pibarot, P. Genomics: the next step to elucidate the etiology of calcific aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.51, 1327–1336 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Michelena, H. I. et al. Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA306, 1104–1112 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Michelena, H. I. et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: dentifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the international bicuspid aortic valve consortium (BAVCon). Circulation129, 2691–2704 (2014). A review of the diagnosis, complications and management of bicuspid aortic valve syndrome. ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Stewart, B. F. et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular Health Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.29, 630–634 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cosmi, J. E. et al. The risk of the development of aortic stenosis in patients with “benign” aortic valve thickening. Arch. Intern. Med.162, 2345–2347 (2002). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Coffey, S., Cox, B. & Williams, M. J. The prevalence, incidence, progression, and risks of aortic valve sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 2852–2861 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Nkomo, V. T. et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet368, 1005–1011 (2006). An epidemiology study reporting the prevalence of valvular heart disease, including calcific AS, in the general population. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Eveborn, G. W., Schirmer, H., Heggelund, G., Lunde, P. & Rasmussen, K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. The Tromso Study. Heart99, 396–400 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lindroos, M., Kupari, M., Heikkila, J. & Tilvis, R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.21, 1220–1225 (1993). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Danielsen, R., Aspelund, T., Harris, T. B. & Gudnason, V. The prevalence of aortic stenosis in the elderly in Iceland and predictions for the coming decades: the AGES-Reykjavik study. Int. J. Cardiol.176, 916–922 (2014). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Osnabrugge, R. L. et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.62, 1002–1012 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Probst, V. et al. Familial aggregation of calcific aortic valve stenosis in the western part of France. Circulation113, 856–860 (2006). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Iung, B. et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease. Eur. Heart J.24, 1231–1243 (2003). A large European survey describing the clinical management of valvular heart disease and adherence to guidelines in real-life clinical practice. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Iung, B. & Vahanian, A. Degenerative calcific aortic stenosis: a natural history. Heart98 (Suppl. 4), iv7–iv13 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Demirbag, R., Sade, L. E., Aydin, M., Bozkurt, A. & Acarturk, E. The Turkish registry of heart valve disease. Turk Kardiyol. Dern. Ars.41, 1–10 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Sliwa, K. et al. Incidence and characteristics of newly diagnosed rheumatic heart disease in urban African adults: insights from the heart of Soweto study. Eur. Heart J.31, 719–727 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Freeman, R. V. & Otto, C. M. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation111, 3316–3326 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rajamannan, N. M., Bonow, R. O. & Rahimtoola, S. H. Calcific aortic stenosis: an update. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med.4, 254–262 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, J. H. & Simmons, C. A. Cell–matrix interactions in the pathobiology of calcific aortic valve disease: critical roles for matricellular, matricrine, and matrix mechanics cues. Circ. Res.108, 1510–1524 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schoen, F. J. Evolving concepts of cardiac valve dynamics: the continuum of development, functional structure, pathobiology, and tissue engineering. Circulation118, 1864–1880 (2008). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Taylor, P. M., Allen, S. P. & Yacoub, M. H. Phenotypic and functional characterization of interstitial cells from human heart valves, pericardium and skin. J. Heart Valve Dis.9, 150–158 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Latif, N., Sarathchandra, P., Chester, A. H. & Yacoub, M. H. Expression of smooth muscle cell markers and co-activators in calcified aortic valves. Eur. Heart J.36, 1335–1345 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Steiner, I., Kasparova, P., Kohout, A. & Dominik, J. Bone formation in cardiac valves: a histopathological study of 128 cases. Virchows Arch.450, 653–657 (2007). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Cote, N. et al. Inflammation is associated with the remodeling of calcific aortic valve disease. Inflammation36, 573–581 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Helske, S. et al. Possible role for mast cell-derived cathepsin G in the adverse remodelling of stenotic aortic valves. Eur. Heart J.27, 1495–1504 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mathieu, P. & Boulanger, M. C. Basic mechanisms of calcific aortic valve disease. Can. J. Cardiol.30, 982–993 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Price, P. A., Toroian, D. & Chan, W. S. Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase is required for the calcification of collagen in serum: a possible mechanism for biomineralization. J. Biol. Chem.284, 4594–4604 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Price, J. et al. Prosthesis–patient mismatch is less frequent and more clinically indolent in patients operated for aortic insufficiency. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.138, 639–645 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rattazzi, M. et al. Extracellular pyrophosphate is reduced in aortic interstitial valve cells acquiring a calcifying profile: implications for aortic valve calcification. Atherosclerosis237, 568–576 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hinton, R. B. et al. Extracellular matrix remodeling and organization in developing and diseased aortic valves. Circ. Res.98, 1431–1438 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Satta, J. et al. Progression of human aortic valve stenosis is associated with tenascin-C expression. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39, 96–101 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Pawade, T. A., Newby, D. E. & Dweck, M. R. Calcification in aortic stenosis: the skeleton key. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.66, 561–577 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Abdelbaky, A. et al. Early aortic valve inflammation precedes calcification: a longitudinal FDG-PET/CT study. Atherosclerosis238, 165–172 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
O'Brien, K. D. et al. Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E accumulate in the morphologically early lesion of ‘degenerative’ valvular aortic stenosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.16, 523–532 (1996). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mohty, D. et al. Association between plasma LDL particle size, valvular accumulation of oxidized LDL, and inflammation in patients with aortic stenosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.28, 187–193 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Olsson, M., Thyberg, J. & Nilsson, J. Presence of oxidized low density lipoprotein in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.19, 1218–1222 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cote, C. et al. Association between circulating oxidised low-density lipoprotein and fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve in aortic stenosis. Heart94, 1175–1180 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Miller, J. D. et al. Dysregulation of antioxidant mechanisms contributes to increased oxidative stress in calcific aortic valvular stenosis in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52, 843–850 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Liberman, M. et al. Oxidant generation predominates around calcifying foci and enhances progression of aortic valve calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.28, 463–470 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Parhami, F. et al. Lipid oxidation products have opposite effects on calcifying vascular cell and bone cell differentiation. A possible explanation for the paradox of arterial calcification in osteoporotic patients. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.17, 680–687 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tsimikas, S. & Witztum, J. L. The role of oxidized phospholipids in mediating lipoprotein (a) atherogenicity. Curr. Opin. Lipidol.19, 369–377 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dube, J. B., Boffa, M. B., Hegele, R. A. & Koschinsky, M.L. Lipoprotein (a): more interesting than ever after 50 years. Curr. Opin. Lipidol.23, 133–140 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Thanassoulis, G. et al. Genetic associations with valvular calcification and aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.368, 503–512 (2013). This is the first large genetic study to show an association between the LPA gene and incident AS. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kamstrup, P. R., Tybjaerg-Hansen, A. & Nordestgaard, B. G. Elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of aortic valve stenosis in the general population. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 470–477 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Arsenault, B. J. et al. Lipoprotein(a) levels, genotype and incident aortic valve stenosis: a prospective Mendelian randomization study and replication in a case–control cohort. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet.7, 304–310 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Capoulade, R. et al. Oxidized phospholipids, lipoprotein(a) and progression of aortic valve stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.66, 1236–1246 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Derbali, H. et al. Increased biglycan in aortic valve stenosis leads to the overexpression of phospholipid transfer protein via Toll-like receptor 2. Am. J. Pathol.176, 2638–2645 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Song, R. et al. Biglycan induces the expression of osteogenic factors in human aortic valve interstitial cells via Toll-like receptor-2. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.32, 2711–2720 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mahmut, A. et al. Lipoprotein lipase in aortic valve stenosis is associated with lipid retention and remodelling. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.43, 570–578 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Osman, N. et al. Smad2-dependent glycosaminoglycan elongation in aortic valve interstitial cells enhances binding of LDL to proteoglycans. Cardiovasc. Pathol.22, 146–155 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hung, M. Y., Witztum, J. L. & Tsimikas, S. New therapeutic targets for calcific aortic valve stenosis: the lipoprotein(a)–lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2-oxidized phospholipid axis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 478–480 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mahmut, A. et al. Elevated expression of Lp-PLA2 in calcific aortic valve disease: implication for valve mineralization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 460–469 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mahmut, A. et al. Lp-PLA2 is associated with structural valve degeneration of bioprostheses. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.44, 136–145 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Capoulade, R. et al. Impact of plasma Lp-PLA2 activity on the progression of aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging8, 26–33 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Tellis, C. C. & Tselepis, A. D. The role of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in atherosclerosis may depend on its lipoprotein carrier in plasma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1791, 327–338 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bouchareb, R. et al. Autotaxin derived from lipoprotein(a) and valve interstitial cells promotes inflammation and mineralization of the aortic valve. Circulation132, 677–690 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rogers, M. A. & Aikawa, E. Not a-so-little role for lipoprotein(a) in the development of calcific aortic valve disease. Circulation132, 621–623 (2015). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nagy, E. et al. Upregulation of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway in human aortic valves correlates with severity of stenosis and leads to leukotriene-induced effects on valvular myofibroblasts. Circulation123, 1316–1325 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wirrig, E. E., Gomez, M. V., Hinton, R. B. & Yutzey, K. E. COX2 inhibition reduces aortic valve calcification in vivo. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.35, 938–947 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mathieu, P., Bouchareb, R. & Boulanger, M. C. Innate and adaptive immunity in calcific aortic valve disease. J. Immunol. Res.2015, 851945 (2015). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Venardos, N. et al. Aortic valve calcification is mediated by a differential response of aortic valve interstitial cells to inflammation. J. Surg. Res.190, 1–8 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Winchester, R. et al. Circulating activated and effector memory T cells are associated with calcification and clonal expansions in bicuspid and tricuspid valves of calcific aortic stenosis. J. Immunol.187, 1006–1014 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yoshioka, M. et al. Chondromodulin-I maintains cardiac valvular function by preventing angiogenesis. Nat. Med.12, 1151–1159 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bosse, Y. et al. Refining molecular pathways leading to calcific aortic valve stenosis by studying gene expression profile of normal calcified stenotic human aortic valves. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet.2, 489–498 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Helske, S. et al. Increased expression of elastolytic cathepsins S, K, and V and their inhibitor cystatin C in stenotic aortic valves. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.26, 1791–1798 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Aikawa, E. et al. Arterial and aortic valve calcification abolished by elastolytic cathepsin S deficiency in chronic renal disease. Circulation119, 1785–1794 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu, Y. C., Boston, J. R., Simaan, M. A. & Antak, J. F. Minimally invasive estimation of systemic vascular parameters. Ann. Biomed. Eng.29, 595–606 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hsu, H., Shu, H. B., Pan, M. G. & Goeddel, D. V. TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways. Cell84, 299–308 (1996). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, H. L., Woo, K. M., Ryoo, H. M. & Baek, J. H. Tumor necrosis factor-α increases alkaline phosphatase expression in vascular smooth muscle cells via MSX2 induction. Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun.391, 1087–1092 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Isoda, K., Matsuki, T., Kondo, H., Iwakura, Y. & Ohsuzu, F. Deficiency of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist induces aortic valve disease in BALB/c mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.30, 708–715 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lai, C. F. et al. TNFR1-activated reactive oxidative species signals up-regulate osteogenic Msx2 programs in aortic myofibroblasts. Endocrinology153, 3897–3910 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Galeone, A. et al. Aortic valvular interstitial cells apoptosis and calcification are mediated by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Int. J. Cardiol.169, 296–304 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
El Husseini, D. et al. P2Y2 receptor represses IL-6 expression by valve interstitial cells through Akt: implication for calcific aortic valve disease. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.72, 146–156 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wada, T., Nakashima, T., Hiroshi, N. & Penninger, J. M. RANKL–RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease. Trends Mol. Med.12, 17–25 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kaden, J. J. et al. Receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulate aortic valve calcification. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.36, 57–66 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Weiss, R. M. et al. Osteoprotegerin inhibits aortic valve calcification and preserves valve function in hypercholesterolemic mice. PLoS ONE8, e65201 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Demer, L. L. Vascular calcification and osteoporosis: inflammatory responses to oxidized lipids. Int. J. Epidemiol.31, 737–741 (2002). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Skolnick, A. H., Osranek, M., Formica, P. & Kronzon, I. Osteoporosis treatment and progression of aortic stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol.104, 122–124 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Osako, M. K. et al. Estrogen inhibits vascular calcification via vascular RANKL system: common mechanism of osteoporosis and vascular calcification. Circ. Res.107, 466–475 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Helske, S. et al. Induction of local angiotensin II-producing systems in stenotic aortic valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44, 1859–1866 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
O'Brien, K. D. et al. Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with low-density lipoprotein in aortic valvular lesions and in human plasma. Circulation106, 2224–2230 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cote, N. et al. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein, angiotensin II and increased waist cirumference are associated with valve inflammation in prehypertensive patients with aortic stenosis. Int. J. Cardiol.145, 444–449 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fujisaka, T. et al. Angiotensin II promotes aortic valve thickening independent of elevated blood pressure in apolipoprotein-E deficient mice. Atherosclerosis226, 82–87 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Arishiro, K. et al. Angiotensin receptor-1 blocker inhibits atherosclerotic changes and endothelial disruption of the aortic valve in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49, 1482–1489 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cote, N., Couture, C., Pibarot, P., Despres, J. P. & Mathieu, P. Angiotensin receptor blockers are associated with a lower remodelling score of stenotic aortic valves. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.41, 1172–1179 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Capoulade, R. et al. Impact of hypertension and renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in aortic stenosis. Eur. J. Clin. Invest.43, 1262–1272 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Simmons, C. A., Grant, G. R., Manduchi, E. & Davies, P. F. Spatial heterogeneity of endothelial phenotypes correlates with side-specific vulnerability to calcification in normal porcine aortic valves. Circ. Res.96, 792–799 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Holliday, C. J., Ankeny, R. F., Jo, H. & Nerem, R. M. Discovery of shear- and side-specific mRNAs and miRNAs in human aortic valvular endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.301, H856–H867 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Garg, V. et al. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature437, 270–274 (2005). This is the first study to report that mutations in NOTCH1 cause both development of bicuspid aortic valve and calcification of aortic valve. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nigam, V. & Srivastava, D. J. Notch1 represses osteogenic pathways in aortic valve cells. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.47, 828–834 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Nus, M. et al. Diet-induced aortic valve disease in mice haploinsufficient for the Notch pathway effector RBPJK/CSL. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.31, 1580–1588 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Deregowski, V., Gazzerro, E., Priest, L., Rydziel, S. & Canalis, E. Notch 1 overexpression inhibits osteoblastogenesis by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin but not bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J. Biol. Chem.281, 6203–6210 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Theodoris, C. V. et al. Human disease modeling reveals integrated transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of NOTCH1 haploinsufficiency. Cell160, 1072–1086 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Caira, F. C. et al. Human degenerative valve disease is associated with up-regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 receptor-mediated bone formation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47, 1707–1712 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shao, J. S. et al. Msx2 promotes cardiovascular calcification by activating paracrine Wnt signals. J. Clin. Invest.115, 1210–1220 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cola, C., Almeida, M., Li, D., Romeo, F. & Mehta, J. L. Regulatory role of endothelium in the expression of genes affecting arterial calcification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.320, 424–427 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M. et al. MicroRNA-30b is a multifunctional regulator of aortic valve interstitial cells. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.147, 1073–1080 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bertazzo, S. et al. Nano-analytical electron microscopy reveals fundamental insights into human cardiovascular tissue calcification. Nat. Mater.12, 576–583 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bouchareb, R. et al. Mechanical strain induces the production of spheroid mineralized microparticles in the aortic valve through a RhoA/ROCK-dependent mechanism. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.67, 49–59 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
New, S. E. et al. Macrophage-derived matrix vesicles: an alternative novel mechanism for microcalcification in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ. Res.113, 72–77 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hjortnaes, J., New, S.E. & Aikawa, E. Visualizing novel concepts of cardiovascular calcification. Trends Cardiovasc. Med.23, 71–79 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cote, N. et al. ATP acts as a survival signal and prevents the mineralization of aortic valve. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.52, 1191–1202 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mahmut, A., Boulanger, M. C., Bouchareb, R., Hadji, F. & Mathieu, P. Adenosine derived from ecto-nucleotidases in calcific aortic valve disease promotes mineralization through A2a adenosine receptor. Cardiovasc. Res.106, 109–120 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mathieu, P. et al. Calcification of human valve interstitial cells is dependent on alkaline phosphatase activity. J. Heart Valve Dis.14, 353–357 (2005). PubMed Google Scholar
Bouchareb, R. et al. Carbonic anhydrase XII in valve interstitial cells promotes the regression of calcific aortic valve stenosis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.82, 104–115 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lorell, B. H. & Carabello, B. A. Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. Circulation102, 470–479 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mewton, N., Liu, C. Y., Croisille, P., Bluemke, D. & Lima, J. A. Assessment of myocardial fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.57, 891–903 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Carroll, J. D. et al. Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the elderly. Circulation86, 1099–1107 (1992). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Pagé, A. et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with more pronounced impairment of LV geometry and function in patients with calcific aortic stenosis: a substudy of the ASTRONOMER trial (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55, 1867–1874 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lund, B. P. et al. Effect of obesity on left ventricular mass and systolic function in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (a Simvastatin Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis [SEAS] substudy). Am. J. Cardiol.105, 1456–1460 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lindman, B. R. et al. The adverse impact of diabetes mellitus on left ventricular remodeling and function in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circ. Heart Fail4, 286–292 (2011). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cramariuc, D. et al. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS substudy. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 390–399 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Cioffi, G. et al. Prognostic value of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart97, 301–307 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Duncan, A. I. et al. Influence of concentric left ventricular remodeling on early mortality after aortic valve replacement. Ann. Thorac Surg.85, 2030–2039 (2008). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rajappan, K. et al. Mechanisms of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Circulation105, 470–476 (2002). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rajappan, K. et al. Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation107, 3170–3175 (2003). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Julius, B. K. et al. Angina pectoris in patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. Mechanisms and pathophysiological concepts. Circulation95, 892–898 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mutlak, D. et al. Frequency determinants and outcome of pulmonary hypertension in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Am. J. Med. Sci.343, 397–401 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lancellotti, P. et al. Determinants and prognostic significance of exercise pulmonary hypertension in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation126, 851–859 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dumesnil, J. G., Shoucri, R. M., Laurenceau, J. L. & Turcot, J. A mathematical model of the dynamic geometry of the intact left ventricle and its application to clinical data. Circulation59, 1024–1034 (1979). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lancellotti, P. et al. Risk stratification in asymptomatic moderate to severe aortic stenosis: the importance of the valvular, arterial and ventricular interplay. Heart96, 1364–1371 (2010). This is a prospective study that shows the prognostic value of valve stenosis severity, valvulo-arterial impedance, left ventricular longitudinal function and left atrial dilation in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Kusunose, K. et al. Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging7, 938–945 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Fernandez, B. et al. Bicuspid aortic valves with different spatial orientations of the leaflets are distinct etiological entities. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54, 2312–2318 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mathieu, P. et al. The pathology and pathobiology of bicuspid aortic valves: state of the art and novel research perspective. J. Pathol. Clin. Res.1, 195–206 (2015). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mohty, D. et al. Age-related differences in the pathogenesis of calcific aortic stenosis: the potential role of resistin. Int. J. Cardiol.142, 126–132 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Aronow, W. S., Schwartz, K. S. & Koenigsberg, M. Correlation of serum lipids, calcium, and phosphorus, diabetes mellitus and history of systemic hypertension with presence or absence of calcified or thickened aortic cusps or root in elderly patients. Am. J. Cardiol.59, 998–999 (1987). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Katz, R. et al. Features of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus as predictors of aortic valve calcification in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circulation113, 2113–2119 (2006). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mohler, E. R., Sheridan, M. J., Nichols, R., Harvey, W. P. & Waller, B.F. Development and progression of aortic valve stenosis: atherosclerosis risk factors — a causal relationship? A clinical morphologic study. Clin. Cardiol.14, 995–999 (1991). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Otto, C. M. et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation95, 2262–2270 (1997). This is one of the first prospective studies to describe the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of the progression and outcomes of calcific AS. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Livanainen, A. M., Lindroos, M., Tilvis, R., Heikkila, J. & Kupari, M. Natural history of aortic valve stenosis of varying severity in the elderly. Am. J. Cardiol.78, 97–101 (1996). Article Google Scholar
Palta, S., Pai, A. M., Gill, K. S. & Pai, R. G. New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis: implications for secondary prevention. Circulation101, 2497–2502 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ngo, M. V., Gottdiener, J. S., Fletcher, R. D., Fernicola, D. J. & Gersh, B. J. Smoking and obesity are associated with the progression of aortic stenosis. Am. J. Geriatr. Cardiol.10, 86–90 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Capoulade, R. et al. Impact of metabolic syndrome on progression of aortic stenosis: influence of age and statin therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.60, 216–223 (2012). This is a post hoc analysis of the ASTRONOMER study showing that metabolic syndrome is associated with faster progression of AS and that statins may accelerate the stenosis progression in these patients. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hekimian, G. et al. Progression of aortic valve stenosis is associated with bone remodelling and secondary hyperparathyroidism in elderly patients — the COFRASA study. Eur. Heart J.34, 1915–1922 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Briand, M. et al. Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 291–298 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rieck, A. E. et al. Hypertension in aortic stenosis: implications for left ventricular structure and cardiovascular events. Hypertension60, 90–97 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cripe, L., Andelfinger, G., Martin, L. J., Shooner, K. & Benson, D. W. Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44, 138–143 (2004). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Laforest, B., Andelfinger, G. & Nemer, M. Loss of Gata5 in mice leads to bicuspid aortic valve. J. Clin. Invest.121, 2876–2887 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, L. M. et al. GATA5 loss-of-function mutations associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Int. J. Mol. Med.33, 1219–1226 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Foffa, I. et al. Sequencing of NOTCH1, GATA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 genes in familial cases of bicuspid aortic valve. BMC Med. Genet.14, 44 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ducharme, V., Guauque-Olarte, S., Pibarot, P., Mathieu, P. & Bossé, Y. NOTCH1 genetic variants in patients with tricuspid calcific aortic valve stenosis. J. Heart Valve Dis.22, 142–149 (2013). PubMed Google Scholar
Guauque-Olarte, S. et al. Calcium signalings pathway genes RUNX2 and CACNA1C are associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet.8, 812–822 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Smith, J. G. et al. Association of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-related genetic variants with aortic valve calcium and incident aortic stenosis. JAMA312, 1764–1771 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cowell, S. J. et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.352, 2389–2397 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rossebo, A. B. et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.359, 1343–1356 (2008). This is a randomized clinical trial that reports no effect of statins on the progression and the outcomes of calcific AS. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Chan, K. L., Teo, K., Dumesnil, J. G., Ni, A. & Tam, J. Effect of lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: results of the aortic stenosis progression observation: measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation121, 306–314 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Baumgartner, H. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur. J. Echocardiogr.10, 1–25 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Pibarot, P. & Dumesnil, J. G. Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.60, 1845–1853 (2012). This is a review of the diagnosis and the management of low-flow, low-gradient AS, which is one of the most challenging entities in patients with valvular heart diseases. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Nishimuram, R. A. & Carabello, B. A. Hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the 21st century. Circulation125, 2138–2150 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Omran, H. et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet361, 1241–1246 (2003). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Otto, C. M., Lind, B. K., Kitzman, D. W., Gersh, B. J. & Siscovick, D. S. Association of aortic-valve sclerosis with cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in the elderly. N. Engl. J. Med.341, 142–147 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Owens, D. S. et al. Aortic valve calcium independently predicts coronary and cardiovascular events in a primary prevention population. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.5, 619–625 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Lancellotti, P. et al. Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation112, I377–I382 (2005). PubMed Google Scholar
Maréchaux, S. et al. Usefulness of exercise stress echocardiography for risk stratification of true asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur. Heart J.31, 1390–1397 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Monin, J. L. et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation108, 319–324 (2003). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hachicha, Z., Dumesnil, J. G., Bogaty, P. & Pibarot, P. Paradoxical low flow low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival. Circulation115, 2856–2864 (2007). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Blais, C. et al. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation113, 711–721 (2006). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Clavel, M. A. et al. Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr.23, 380–386 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Tribouilloy, C. et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53, 1865–1873 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Clavel, M. A. et al. Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging6, 175–183 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Clavel, M. A. et al. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined doppler-echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.62, 2329–2338 (2013). This is a multicentre study showing the usefulness of aortic valve calcium scoring by MDCT to corroborate the stenosis severity in patients with discordant findings at echocardiography. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Clavel, M. A. et al. Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.64, 1202–1213 (2014). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosenhek, R. et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.343, 611–617 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jenkins, W. S. et al. Valvular 18F-fluoride and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake predict disease progression and clinical outcome in patients with aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.66, 1200–1201 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Minners, J. et al. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function. Heart96, 1463–1468 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dayan, V. et al. Outcome and impact of aortic valve replacement in patients with preserved LVEF and low-gradient aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.66, 2594–2603 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hyafil, F. et al. Detection of 18fluoride sodium accumulation by positron emission tomography in calcified stenotic aortic valves. Am. J. Cardiol.109, 1194–1196 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dweck, M. R. et al. Assessment of valvular calcification and inflammation by positron emission tomography in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation125, 76–86 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dweck, M. R. et al. 18F-sodium fluoride uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging7, 371–378 (2014). This study shows the use of sodium fluoride PET to detect the mineralization activity in the aortic valve and to predict the rapidity of aortic stenosis progression. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Le Ven, F. et al. Valve tissue characterization by magnetic resonance imaging in calcific aortic valve disease. Can. J. Cardiol.30, 1676–1683 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hope, M. D. et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology255, 53–61 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hope, M. D. et al. 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging4, 781–787 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bartko, P. E. et al. Two-dimensional strain for the assessment of left ventricular function in low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis, relationship to hemodynamics and outcome: a substudy of the multicenter TOPAS study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging6, 268–276 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dahou, A. et al. Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter true or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging8, e002117 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lancellotti, P. et al. Impact of global left ventricular afterload on left ventricular function in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking study. Eur. J. Echocardiogr.11, 537–543 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dahl, J. S. et al. Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging8, e002917 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lancellotti, P. et al. Prognostic effect of long-axis left ventricular dysfunction and B-type natriuretic peptide levels in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol.105, 383–388 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ozkan, A., Kapadia, S., Tuzcu, M. & Marwick, T. H. Assessment of left ventricular function in aortic stenosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.8, 494–501 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Clavel, M. A. et al. B-type natriuretic peptide clinical activation in aortic stenosis: impact on long-term survival. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 2016–2025 (2014). This study shows the prognostic value of plasma BNP in patients with calcific AS. It also shows the importance of standardizing the measured level of BNP against the normal reference value for the patient's age and sex. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Weidemann, F. et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation120, 577–584 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Azevedo, C. F. et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56, 278–287 (2010). This is one of the first studies to show the prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis measured by CMR in patients with calcific AS. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dweck, M. R. et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.58, 1271–1279 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Milano, A. D. et al. Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.144, 830–837 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Herrmann, S. et al. Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.58, 402–412 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Nazarian, S. Is ventricular arrhythmia a possible mediator of the association between aortic stenosis-related midwall fibrosis and mortality? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.58, 1280–1282 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Chin, C. W. et al. High-sensitivity troponin I concentrations are a marker of an advanced hypertrophic response and adverse outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur. Heart J.35, 2312–2321 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosjo, H., Andreassen, J., Edvardsen, T. & Omland, T. Prognostic usefulness of circulating high-sensitivity troponin T in aortic stenosis and relation to echocardiographic indexes of cardiac function and anatomy. Am. J. Cardiol.108, 88–91 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Z. et al. Circulating level of miR-378 predicts left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis. PLoS ONE9, e105702 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosjo, H. et al. Prognostic value of circulating microRNA-210 levels in patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis. PLoS ONE9, e91812 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lindman, B. R. et al. Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. Heart101, 1382–1388 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Iung, B. et al. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur. Heart J.26, 2714–2720 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Leon, M. B. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Eng. J. Med.363, 1597–1607 (2010). This randomized clinical trial shows the major superiority of TAVR compared with conservative management in patients who cannot undergo surgical AVR. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Lindman, B. R., Alexander, K. P., O'Gara, P. T. & Afilalo, J. Futility, benefit, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.7, 707–716 (2014). This review describes the challenges and strategies for decision-making in patients with severe calcific AS who are potential candidates for TAVR. ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. Jr, Rich, J. B., Zoghbi, W. A. & Mack, M. J. The heart team of cardiovascular care. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.61, 903–907 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. Jr, Mohr, F., Hamm, C. W. & Mack, M. J. Venn diagrams in cardiovascular disease: the Heart Team concept. Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg.43, 255–257 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. et al. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.59, 1200–1254 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Levy, F. et al. Aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and long-term outcome: a European multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.51, 1466–1472 (2008). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Harken, D. E. et al. Partial and complete prostheses in aortic insufficiency. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.40, 744–762 (1960). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, R. et al. Fifteen-year outcome trends for valve surgery in North America. Ann. Thorac Surg.91, 677–684 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Brown, J. M. et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.137, 82–90 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Hamm, C. W. et al. The German Aortic Valve registry (GARY): in-hospital outcome. Eur. Heart J.35, 1588–1598 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
David, T. E., Woo, A., Armstrong, S. & Maganti, M. When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease? J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.139, 68–73 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stulak, J. M. et al. Spectrum and outcome of reoperations after the Ross procedure. Circulation122, 1153–1158 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
David, T. E. Reoperations after the Ross procedure. Circulation122, 1139–1140 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Chiang, Y. P. et al. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years. JAMA312, 1323–1329 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brown, M. L., McKellar, S. H., Sundt, T. M. & Schaff, H. V. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.137, 670–679 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Astor, B. C., Kaczmarek, R. G., Hefflin, B. & Daley, W. R. Mortality after aortic valve replacement: results from a nationally representative database. Ann. Thorac Surg.70, 1939–1945 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ambler, G. et al. Generic, simple risk stratification model for heart valve surgery. Circulation112, 224–231 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ashikhmina, E. A. et al. Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: determinants of late outcome. Circulation124, 1070–1078 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bach, D. S. et al. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes2, 533–539 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Smith, C. R. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med.364, 2187–2198 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Adams, D. H. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N. Engl. J. Med.370, 1790–1798 (2014). This randomized clinical trial shows the superiority of TAVR compared with surgical AVR in patients with intermediate or high surgical risk. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kapadia, S. R. et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet385, 2485–2491 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mack, M. J. et al. 5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet385, 2477–2484 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Popma, J. J. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 1972–1981 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Biere, L. et al. Influence of sex on mortality and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR: insights from the FRANCE 2 registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.65, 755–757 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Gilard, M. et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N. Eng. J. Med.366, 1705–1715 (2012). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Ludman, P. F. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom: temporal trends, predictors of outcome, and 6-year follow-up: a report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) registry, 2007 to 2012. Circulation131, 1181–1190 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Holmes, D. R. et al. Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JAMA313, 1019–1028 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Blackstone, E. H. et al. Propensity-matched comparisons of clinical outcomes after transapical or transfemoral TAVR: a PARTNER-I trial substudy. Circulation131, 1989–2000 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Martinez-Clark, P. O. et al. Transcaval retrograde transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with no other access: first-in-man experience with CoreValve. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv7, 1075–1077 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Moat, N. E. et al. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis the U. K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.58, 2130–2138 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Walther, T. et al. Perioperative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve replacements: prospective data from the GARY registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.65, 2173–2180 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rodes-Cabau, J. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.9, 15–29 (2012). Article Google Scholar
Athappan, G. et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.61, 1585–1595 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Genereux, P. et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the new Achilles’ heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.61, 1125–1136 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Pibarot, P., Hahn, R. T., Weissman, N. J. & Monaghan, M. J. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging8, 340–360 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Kodali, S. et al. Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes. Eur. Heart J.36, 449–456 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Van Belle, E. et al. Postprocedural aortic regurgitation in balloon-expandable and self-expandable TAVR procedures: analysis of predictors and impact on long-term mortality: insights from the FRANCE2 registry. Circulation129, 1415–1427 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Babaliaros, V. et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.7, 898–904 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dvir, D. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA312, 162–170 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Makkar, R. R. et al. Stratification of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement according to surgical inoperability for technical versus clinical reasons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 901–911 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Toggweiler, S. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.59, 2068–2074 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lindman, B. R. et al. Effect of tricuspid regurgitation and the right heart on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the placement of aortic transcatheter valves II inoperable cohort. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv.8, e002073 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. R. et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation124, 1964–1972 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Reynolds, M. R. et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial (cohort A). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.60, 548–558 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Svensson, L. G. et al. Comprehensive analysis of mortality among patients undergoing TAVR: results of the PARTNER trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.64, 158–168 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Goel, S. S. et al. Severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease — implications for management in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era: a comprehensive review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.62, 1–10 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Stefanini, G. G. et al. Coronary artery disease severity and aortic stenosis: clinical outcomes according to SYNTAX score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur. Heart J.35, 2530–2540 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Paradis, J. M. et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: What do we know? What don't we know? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms. Eur. Heart J.35, 2069–2082 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Otto, C. M. et al. Three-year outcome after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Insights into prognosis of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation89, 642–650 (1994). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kapadia, S. et al. Outcomes of inoperable symptomatic aortic stenosis patients not undergoing aortic valve replacement: insight into the impact of balloon aortic valvuloplasty from the PARTNER trial (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER valve trial). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.8, 324–333 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Otto, C. M. & Prendergast, B. Aortic-valve stenosis — from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction. N. Engl. J. Med.371, 744–756 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schwarz, F. et al. The effect of aortic valve replacement on survival. Circulation66, 1105–1110 (1982). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Green, P. et al. The impact of frailty status on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.5, 974–981 (2012). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schoenenberger, A. W. et al. Predictors of functional decline in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Eur. Heart J.34, 692 (2013). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Stortecky, S. et al. Evaluation of multidimensional geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.5, 489–496 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mihaljevic, T. et al. Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: implications for decision making. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.135, 1270–1278 (2008). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Kupari, M., Turto, H. & Lommi, J. Left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve stenosis: preventive or promotive of systolic dysfunction and heart failure? Eur. Heart J.26, 1790–1796 (2005). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dweck, M. R., Boon, N. A. & Newby, D. E. Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.60, 1854–1863 (2012). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Biner, S. et al. Prognostic value of E/E' ratio in patients with unoperated severe aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 899–907 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dewey, T. M. et al. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac Cardiovasc. Surg.135, 180–187 (2008). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Lindman, B. R. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with diabetes and severe aortic stenosis at high risk for surgery: an analysis of the PARTNER trial (placement of aortic transcatheter valve). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 1090–1099 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Herrmann, H. C. et al. Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low flow severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial analysis. Circulation127, 2316–2326 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dvir, D. et al. Outcomes of patients with chronic lung disease and severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement or standard therapy: insights for the PARTNER trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.63, 269–279 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Mok, M. et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights on clinical outcomes, prognostic markers, and functional status changes. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.6, 1072–1084 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rodes-Cabau, J. et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv7, 701–711 (2014). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Gjesdal, O., Bluemke, D. A. & Lima, J. A. Cardiac remodeling at the population level — risk factors, screening, and outcomes. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.8, 673–685 (2011). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Bull, S. et al. Human non-contrast T1 values and correlation with histology in diffuse fibrosis. Heart99, 932–937 (2013). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Makkar, R. R. et al. Transcateter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med.366, 1696–1704 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kodali, S. K. et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N. Engl. J. Med.366, 1686–1695 (2012). This article reports the 2-year outcomes of the first randomized trial comparing transcatheter versus surgical AVR. This study shows that paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR is associated with increased risk of mortality.
Webb, J. G. et al. A randomized evaluation of the SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve system in patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.8, 1797–1806 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Kodali, S. & The PARTNER 3 TAVR Investigators. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes at 30 days with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR system in inoperable, high-risk and intermediate-risk AS patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Abstr. press release [online] (2015).
Herrmann, H. C. Evaluation of a balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve in high-risk and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis — one-year outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Abstr.[online] (2015).
Reardon, M. J. et al. 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.66, 113–121 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Abdel-Wahab, M. et al. Comparison of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the CHOICE randomized clinical trial. JAMA311, 1503–1514 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Thyregod, H. G. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: one-year results from the all-comers nordic aortic valve intervention (NOTION) randomized clinical trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.65, 2184–2194 (2015). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
US National Library of Science. The PARTNER II trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves. ClinicalTrials.gov[online], (2011).
US National Library of Science. Safety and efficacy study of the Medtronic CoreValve® system in the treatment of severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis in intermediate risk subjects who need aortic valve replacement (SURTAVI). ClinicalTrials.gov[online], (2012).