Quantitative genetic analyses of complex behaviours in Drosophila (original) (raw)

• Mackay, T. F. C. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 11–20 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. F. C. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 303–339 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Adams, M. D. et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195 (2000).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dudai, Y., Jan, Y. N., Byers, D., Quinn, W. G. & Benzer, S. dunce, a mutant of Drosophila deficient in learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 73, 1684–1688 (1976).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quinn, W. G., Harris, W. A. & Benzer, S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 708–712 (1974).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Konopka, R. J. & Benzer, S. Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68, 2112–2116 (1971).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Greenspan, R. J. & Ferveur, J. -F. Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 205–232 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moehring, A. J. & Mackay, T. F. C. The quantitative genetic basis of male mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 167, 1249–1263 (2004).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Osborne, K. A. et al. Natural behavior polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. Science 277, 834–836 (1997). A classic paper, reporting the behavioural effects of naturally occurring polymorphisms in the foraging gene, which encodes a cGMP-dependent protein kinase. The authors show that subtle alterations in enzyme activity profoundly alter larval foraging behaviour in D. melanogaster.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anholt, R. R. H., Lyman, R. F. & Mackay, T. F. C. Effects of single _P_-element insertions on olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 143, 293–301 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Lee, A. Y., Bowens, N. M., Huber, R. & Kravitz, E. A. Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5664–5668 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Benzer, S. Behavioral mutants of Drosophila isolated by countercurrent distribution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 58, 1112–1119 (1967).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. Sign of taxis as a property of the genotype. Science 143, 835–835 (1961). Reports one of the earliest experiments in fly behavioural genetics. The authors demonstrate that artificial selection can be used to generate flies that prefer to migrate either upwards or downwards in a geotactic maze. The selection lines reported in this paper were used 40 years later in the transcriptional profiling studies described in reference 62.
  Google Scholar
• Quinn, W. G., Sziber, P. P. & Booker, R. The Drosophila memory mutant amnesiac. Nature 277, 212–214 (1979).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weber, K. E. An apparatus for measurement of resistance to gas-phase reagents. Drosoph. Inf. Serv. 67, 91–93 (1988).
  Google Scholar
• Moore, M. S. et al. Ethanol intoxication in Drosophila: genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling pathway. Cell 93, 997–1007 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rothenfluh, A. & Heberlein, U. Drugs, flies, and videotape: the effects of ethanol and cocaine on Drosophila locomotion. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 639–645 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hall, J. C. The mating of a fly. Science 264, 1702–1714 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dubnau, J. & Tully, T. Gene discovery in Drosophila: new insights for learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 407–444 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Waddell, S. & Quinn, W. G. Flies, genes and learning. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1283–1309 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McKenna, M., Monte, P., Helfand, S. L., Woodard, C. & Carlson, J. A simple chemosensory response in Drosophila and the isolation of acj mutants in which it is affected. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8118–8122 (1989).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anholt, R. R. H. et al. The genetic architecture of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila: epistasis and the transcriptome. Nature Genet. 35, 180–184 (2003). Quantifies the extent of transcriptional co-regulation among a set of co-isogenic mutant lines with single P -element insertions that affect olfactory avoidance behaviour and illustrates how transcriptional profiling together with quantitative complementation tests for epistasis can be used for gene discovery.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, Essex, 1996).
  Google Scholar
• McGuire, S. E., Le, P. T. & Davis, R. L. The role of Drosophila mushroom body signaling in olfactory memory. Science 293, 1330–1333 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Allada, R., Emery, P., Takahashi, J. S. & Rosbash, M. Stopping time: the genetics of fly and mouse circadian clocks. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1091–1119 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ben-Shlomo, R. & Kyriacou, C. P. Circadian rhythm entrainment in flies and mammals. Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 37, 141–156 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ashmore, L. J. & Sehgal, A. A fly's eye view of circadian entrainment. J. Biol. Rhythms 18, 206–216 (2003).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Cirelli, C. Searching for sleep mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Bioessays 25, 940–949 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. J. & Rosbash, M. Microarray analysis and organization of circadian gene expression in Drosophila. Cell 107, 567–578 (2001). This paper, together with reference 31, presents the first expression microarray analyses of a behavioural trait in D. melanogaster . Although the observed transcriptional profiles differ between these papers, they both demonstrate that circadian time affects not only expression of genes that are directly implicated in the biological clock, but has far reaching implications for the transcription of many genes, including those implicated in several behaviours.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Claridge-Chang, A. et al. Circadian regulation of gene expression systems in the Drosophila head. Neuron 32, 657–671 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Norga, K. K. et al. Quantitative analysis of bristle number in Drosophila mutants identifies genes involved in neural development. Curr. Biol. 13, 1388–1396 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B. C. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284, 1670–1672 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. F. C., Hackett, J. B., Lyman, R. F., Wayne, M. L. & Anholt, R. R. H. Quantitative genetic variation of odor-guided behavior in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144, 727–735 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Devaud, J. M. Experimental studies of adult Drosophila chemosensory behaviour. Behav. Processes 64, 177–196 (2003).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Belgacem, Y. H. & Martin, J. R. Neuroendocrine control of a sexually dimorphic behavior by a few neurons of the pars intercerebralis in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15154–15158 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Helfrich-Forster, C. Differential control of morning and evening components in the activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster — sex-specific differences suggest a different quality of activity. J. Biol. Rhythms 15, 135–154 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jin, W. et al. The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Genet. 29, 389–395 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ranz, J. M., Castillo-Davis, C. I., Meiklejohn, C. D. & Hartl, D. L. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science 300, 1742–1745 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Parisi, M. et al. Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299, 697–700 (2003).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fujii, S. & Amrein, H. Genes expressed in the Drosophila head reveal a role for fat cells in sex-specific physiology. EMBO J. 21, 5353–5363 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rice, W. R. Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256, 1436–1439 (1992).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Levene, H. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87, 331–333 (1953).
  Google Scholar
• Greenspan, R. J. A kinder, gentler genetic analysis of behavior: dissection gives way to modulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 805–811 (1997).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ganguly, I., Mackay, T. F. C. & Anholt, R. R. H. Scribble is essential for olfactory behavior in Drosophila. Genetics 164, 1447–1457 (2003).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, N. H., Yamamoto, A. H., Robinson, K. O., Mackay, T. F. C. & Anholt, R. R. H. The DSC1 channel, encoded by the smi60E locus, contributes to odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 161, 1507–1516 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thibault, S. T. et al. A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nature Genet. 36, 283–287 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fanara, J. J., Robinson, K. O., Rollmann, S. M., Anholt, R. R. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. Vanaso is a candidate quantitative trait gene for olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 162, 1321–1328 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gleason, J. M., Nuzhdin, S. V. & Ritchie, M. G. Quantitative trait loci affecting a courtship signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 89, 1–6 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zeng, Z. B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136, 1457–1468 (1994).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doerge, R. W. & Churchill, G. A. Permutation tests for multiple loci affecting a quantitative character. Genetics 142, 285–294 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hill, W. G. Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genet. Res. 40, 255–278 (1982).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Mackay, T. F., Fry, J. D., Lyman, R. F. & Nuzhdin, S. V. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics 136, 937–951 (1994).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ramilo, S. T., Perez-Figueroa, A., Fernandez, B., Fernandez, J. & Caballero, A. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 528–541 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Berger, J. et al. Genetic mapping with SNP markers in Drosophila. Nature Genet. 29, 475–481 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pasyukova, E. G., Vieira, C. & Mackay, T. F. C. Deficiency mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 156, 1129–1146 (2000). Introduces the method of quantitative complementation mapping using deficiencies, and demonstrates how this method can be used to narrow QTL regions to a small number of candidate genes that affect variation in lifespan in D. melanogaster.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parks, A. L., et al. Systematic generation of high-resolution deletion coverage of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Nature Genet. 36, 288–292 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• DeLuca, M. et al. Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) affects variation in Drosophila longevity. Nature Genet. 34, 429–433 (2003). Demonstrates how LD mapping can be used as a powerful method to identify not only a candidate gene, but also polymorphisms (QTNs) and haplotypes within such genes that contribute to natural variation in a complex trait, in this case lifespan.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Long, A. D., Lyman, R. F., Langley, C. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. Two sites in the _Delta_gene region contribute to naturally occurring variation in bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 149, 999–1017 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lyman, R. F. & Mackay, T. F. C. Candidate quantitative trait loci and naturally occurring phenotypic variation for bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster: the Delta-Hairless gene region. Genetics 149, 983–998 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robin, C., Lyman, R. F., Long, A. D., Langley, C. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. hairy: a quantitative trait locus for Drosophila sensory bristle number. Genetics 162, 155–164 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Toma, D. P., White, K. P., Hirsch, J. & Greenspan, R. J. Identification of genes involved in Drosophila melanogaster geotaxis, a complex behavioral trait. Nature Genet. 31, 349–353 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kerr, M. K. & Churchill, G. A. Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2, 183–201 (2001). Contains excellent advice on the design and analysis of expression microarrays.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003). Introduces assessment of the false discovery rate to estimate false positives in transcriptional profiling experiments. The statistical method described will probably become the standard procedure for microarray analysis.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Borrás, T. et al. Transcription profiling in Drosophila eyes that overexpress the human glaucoma-associated trabecular meshwork-inducible glucocorticoid response protein/myocilin (TIGR/MYOC). Genetics 163, 637–645 (2003).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fedorowicz, G. M., Fry, J. D., Anholt, R. R. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. Epistatic interactions between smell-impaired loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148, 1885–1891 (1998). Describes the first application of the half-diallel cross design for the analysis of epistasis among behavioural genes, and reports an unexpectedly large extent of epistasis among 12 independently isolated co-isogenic P -element insertion lines that affect olfactory avoidance behaviour. This paper formed the basis for the subsequent transcriptional profiling study described in reference 22.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sprague, G. F. & Tatum, L. A. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34, 923–932 (1942).
  Google Scholar
• Griffing, B. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9, 463–493 (1956).
  Google Scholar
• Cockerham, C. C. An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39, 859–882 (1954).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Clark, A. G. & Wang, L. Epistasis in measured genotypes: _Drosophila P_-element insertions. Genetics 147, 157–163 (1997).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eberl, D. F., Duyk, G. M. & Perrimon, N. A genetic screen for mutations that disrupt an auditory response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14837–14842 (1997).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ejima, A., Nakayama, S. & Aigaki, T. Phenotypic association of spontaneous ovulation and sexual receptivity in virgin females of Drosophila melanogaster mutants. Behav. Genet. 31, 437–444 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Baker, B. S., Taylor, B. J. & Hall, J. C. Are complex behaviors specified by dedicated regulatory genes? Reasoning from Drosophila. Cell 105, 13–24 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Williams, J. A. & Sehgal, A. Molecular components of the circadian system in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63, 729–755 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Park, S. K., Sedore, S. A., Cronmiller, C. & Hirsh, J. Type II cAMP-dependent protein kinase-deficient Drosophila are viable but show developmental, circadian, and drug response phenotypes. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20588–20596 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kauvar, L. M. Defective cyclic adenosine 3′:5′-monophosphate phosphodiesterase in the Drosophila memory mutant dunce. J. Neurosci. 2, 1347–1358 (1982).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Levine, J. D., Casey, C. I., Kalderon, D. D. & Jackson, F. R. Altered circadian pacemaker functions and cyclic AMP rhythms in the Drosophila learning mutant dunce. Neuron 13, 967–974 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Charro, M. J. & Alcorta, E. Mutations affecting the cAMP transduction pathway modify olfaction in Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. A 187, 359–370 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tinette, S, Zhang, L. & Robichon, A. Cooperation between Drosophila flies in searching behavior. Genes Brain Behav. 3, 39–50 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ueyama, M. & Fuyama, Y. Enhanced cost of mating in female sterile mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Genet. Syst. 78, 29–36 (2003).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Dauwalder, B. & Davis, R. L. Conditional rescue of the dunce learning/memory and female fertility defects with Drosophila or rat transgenes. J. Neurosci. 15, 3490–3499 (1995).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 2nd edn (W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1981).
  Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Lyman, R. F., Long, A. D., Langley, C. H. & Mackay, T. F. C. Naturally occurring variation in bristle number and DNA polymorphisms at the scabrous locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 266, 1697–1702 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sokolowski, M. B. Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 879–890 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar