Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges (original) (raw)

• Bowers, J. E. & Meredith, C. E. The parentage of a classic wine grape: Cabernet Sauvignon. Nature Genet.16, 84–87 (1997).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V. & Thein, S. L. Individual-specific fingerprints of human DNA. Nature316, 76–79 (1985).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Harris, D. L. Genotypic covariances between inbred relatives. Genetics50, 1319–1348 (1964). An early paper in which co-variances in trait values between individuals are expressed as functions of IBD probabilities.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brenner, C. H. & Weir, B. S. Issues and strategies in the DNA identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor. Popul. Biol.63, 173–178 (2003). Describes the procedures that are used to identify victims from mass disasters using DNA from known relatives, with a focus on statistical, combinatorial and population genetic issues.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wenk, R. E. & Chiafari, F. A. Distinguishing full siblings from half-siblings in limited pedigrees. Transfusion40, 44–47 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gaytmenn, R., Hildebrand, D. P., Sweet, D. & Pretty, I. A. Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of sibship calculations using AmpF/STR Profiler Plus. Int. J. Legal Med.116, 161–164 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reid, T. M. et al. Specificity of sibship determination using the ABI identifiler multiplex system. J. Forensic Sci.49, 1262–1264 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tzeng, C. H. et al. Determination of sibship by PCR-amplified short tandem repeat analysis in Taiwan. Transfusion40, 840–845 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bieber, F. R., Brenner, C. H. & Lazer, D. Finding criminals through DNA of their relatives. Science312, 1315–1316 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Olaisen, B., Stenersen, M. & Mevag, B. Identification by DNA analysis of the victims of the August 1996 Spitsbergen civil aircraft disaster. Nature Genet.15, 402–405 (1997).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Leclair, B., Fegeau, C. J., Bowen, K. L. & Fourney, R. M. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair Flight 111 disaster. J. Forensic Sci.49, 939–953 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. A. Estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann. Hum. Genet.39, 173–188 (1975). The classical treatment of maximum likelihood estimation of the three-parameter set of relatedness measures for non-inbred relatives.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Milligan, B. G. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics163, 1153–1167 (2003). An important demonstration of the superiority of maximum likelihood methods. Contains details on the implementation and performance of maximum likelihood relatedness estimation when the individuals who are being compared might be inbred.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping accounting for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genet.38, 203–208 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liu, W. & Weir, B. S. Affected sib-pair tests in inbred populations. Ann. Hum. Genet.68, 606–619 (2004). The authors develop an analogue of a standard affected sib-pair test for linkage for use in inbred populations.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Balding, D. J. & Nichols, R. A. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci. Int.64, 125–140 (1994). One of the early papers that deals with the calculation of genotype probabilities for individuals who are allowed to come from a subpopulation of the population from which the allele frequencies have been calculated.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ewens, W. J. Mathematical Population Genetics. 1. Theoretical Introduction 2nd edn (Springer, New York, 2004). A useful reference that contains a treatment of the theory that underlies the calculation of genotypic probabilities for structured populations.
  Book Google Scholar
• Hinds, D. A. et al. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science307, 1072–1079 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• International HapMap Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature437, 1299–1320 (2005).
• Ayres, K. The expected performance of single nucleotide polymorphism loci in paternity testing. Forensic Sci. Int.154, 167–172 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sobrino, B., Brion, M. & Carracedo, A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review of SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci. Int.154, 181–194 (2005). Shows that when IBD is measured with respect to distant ancestry, IBD sharing between two individuals varies appreciably across the genome.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gill, P. An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int. J. Legal Med.114, 204–210 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Amorim, A. & Pereira, L. Pros and cons in the use of SNPs in forensic kinship investigation: a comparative analysis with STRs. Forensic Sci. Int.150, 17–21 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hepler, A. B. Improving Forensic Identification using Bayesian Networks and Relatedness Estimation. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh (2005).
  Google Scholar
• Weir, B. S., Cardon, L., Anderson, A. D., Nielsen, D. M. & Hill, W. G. Heterogeneity of measures of population structure along the human genome. Genome Res.15, 1468–1476 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, J. Mass disaster genetics. Nature Genet.15, 329–331 (1997).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• DeWoody, J. A. Molecular approaches to the study of parentage, relatedness, and fitness: practical applications for wild animals. J. Wildl. Manage.69, 1400–1418 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams, C. L., Serfass, T. L., Cogan, R. & Rhodes, O. E. Microsatellite variation in the reintroduced Pennsylvania elk herd. Mol. Ecol.11, 1299–1310 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Slager, S. L. & Schaid, D. J. Evaluation of candidate genes in case–control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects. Am. J. Hum. Genet.68, 1457–1462 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Voight, B. F. & Pritchard, J. K. Confounding from cryptic relatedness in case–control association studies. PLoS Genet.1, 302–311 (2005). Demonstrates that unknown relatedness between supposedly unrelated cases or controls can lead to an increased false-positive rate in genetic association studies.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics55, 997–1004 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Merila, J. & Crnokrak, P. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol.14, 892–903 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cockerham, C. C. Higher order probability functions of identity of alleles by descent. Genetics69, 235–246 (1971). Cockerham considers the sharing of IBD alleles between two individuals in terms of 15 IBD parameters, develops procedures for calculating the values of these parameters from pedigree data and examines their properties under various mating schemes.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jacquard, A. Structures Génétiques des Populations (Masson & Cie, Paris, 1970); English translation available in Charlesworth, D. & Chalesworth, B. Genetics of Human Populations (Springer, New York, 1974). Considers relatedness in terms of nine IBD coefficients: these are now the most commonly used parameters for describing relatedness between two (possibly inbred) individuals.
  Book Google Scholar
• Budowle, B. & Moretti, T. R. Genotype profiles for six population groups at the 13 CODIS short tandem repeat core loci and other PCR-based loci. US Department of Justice Forensic Science Communications [online], <http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/july1999/budowle.htm> (1999).
  Google Scholar