Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice (original) (raw)

References

  1. The Digital Archiving Consultancy (DAC), The Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of Glasgow (BRC), The National e-Science Centre (NeSC). Large-scale Data Sharing in the Life Sciences: Data Standards, Incentives, Barriers and Funding Models (The “Joint Data Standards Study”). [online], <http://www.nesc.ac.uk/technical_papers/UKeS-2006-02.pdf> (2005).
  2. McCarthy, M. I. et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 356–369 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Gibbons, S. M. C., Kaye, J., Smart, A., Heeney, C. & Parker, M. Governing genetic databases: challenges facing research regulation and practice. J. Law Soc. 34, 163–189 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Couzin, J. Genetic privacy. Whole-genome data not anonymous, challenging assumptions. Science 321, 1278 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. [No authors listed]. DNA databases shut after identities compromised. Nature 455, 13 (2008).
  6. Kaiser, J. House weighs proposal to block mandatory 'open access'. Science 321, 1621 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Ziman, J. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
    Book Google Scholar
  8. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S. S. P. & Trow, M. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage Publications, London, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  9. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447, 661–678 (2007).
  10. Cambon-Thomsen, A. Assessing the impact of biobanks. Nature Genet. 34, 25–26 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, E. G. et al. Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. JAMA 287, 473–480 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Foster, M. W. & Sharp, R. R. Share and share alike: deciding how to distribute the scientific and social benefits of genomic data. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 633–639 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Nissenbaum, H. Protecting privacy in an information age: the problem of privacy in public. Law Philos. 17, 559 –596 (1998).
    Google Scholar
  14. Karp D. R. et al. Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases. PLoS Med. 5, e190 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. McGuire, A. L. & Gibbs, R. A. Genetics: no longer de-identified. Science 312, 370–371 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Homer, N. et al. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000167 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Lunshof, J. E., Chadwick, R., Vorhaus, D. B. & Church, G. M. From genetic privacy to open consent. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 406–411 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. McGuire, A. L., Caulfield, T. & Cho, M. K. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nature Rev. Genet. 9, 152–156 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Caulfield, T. et al., Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol. 6, e73 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. McGuire A. L., Hamilton J. A., Lunstroth R. J. D., McCulloch L. B. & Goldman, A. DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives. Genet. Med. 10, 46–53 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Winickoff, D. E. Partnership in U.K. Biobank: a third way for genomic property? J. Law Med. Ethics 35, 440–456 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Mascalzoni, D., Hicks, A., Pramstaller, P. & Wjst, M. Informed consent in the genomics era. PLoS Med. 5, e192 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Muula, A. S. & Mfutso-Bengo, J. M. Responsibilities and obligations of using human research specimens transported across national boundaries. J. Med. Ethics 33, 35–38 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Upshur, R., Lavery, J. & Tindana, P. Taking tissue seriously means taking communities seriously. BMC Med. Ethics 8, 11 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Langat, S. K. Reuse of samples: ethical issues encountered by two institutional ethics review committees in Kenya. Bioethics 19, 537–549 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Hoedemaekers, R., Gordijn, B., Hekster, Y. & Van Agt, F. The complexities of ethical evaluation of genomics research. HEC Forum 18, 18–36 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Zika, E. et.al. Sample and data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues. Pharmocogenomics 9, 773–781 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public perception and public good rationales. King's Law J. 18, 209–226 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references