Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters (original) (raw)
- Comment
- Published: 18 October 2011
Nature Reviews Genetics volume 12, pages 738–739 (2011)Cite this article
- 1363 Accesses
- 54 Citations
- 5 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Subjects
Abstract
To ensure that biobanks reach their full potential, better engagement of the public is needed. The authors argue that the principle of reciprocity should be at the core of these efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
Better governance, better access: practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure
- Madeleine J. Murtagh
- , Mwenza T. Blell
- … Paul R. Burton
Human Genomics Open Access 26 April 2018
Ethical sharing of health data in online platforms – which values should be considered?
- Brígida Riso
- , Aaro Tupasela
- … Vojin Rakic
Life Sciences, Society and Policy Open Access 21 August 2017
The ECOUTER methodology for stakeholder engagement in translational research
- Madeleine J. Murtagh
- , Joel T. Minion
- … Paul R Burton
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 04 April 2017
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
References
- Gaskell, G. & Gottweis, H. Biobanks need publicity. Nature 471, 159–171 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Pardo, R., Midden, C. & Miller, J. D. Attitudes towards biotechnology in the European Union. J. Biotechnol. 98, 9–24 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Godard, B., Marshall, J. & Laberge, C. Community engagement in genetic research: results of the first public consultation for the Quebec CARTaGENE Project.” Community Genet. 10, 147–158 (2007).
PubMed Google Scholar - Lemke, A. A. et al. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 13, 368–377 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Høyer, K. Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity? Public Health Genomics 13, 345–352 (2009).
Article Google Scholar - Meulenkamp, T. M. et al. Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want? Am. J. Med. Genet. A 152, 2482–2492 (2010).
Article Google Scholar - Vermeulen, E. et al. Connective tissue: cancer patients' attitudes towards medical research using excised (tumour) tissue. BioSocieties 8 Aug 2011 (doi:10.1057/biosoc.2011.9).
Article Google Scholar - Kaufman, D. et al. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 643–654 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Gottweis, H. et al. Biobanks and European public opinion: explaining heterogeneity. University of Vienna [online], (2011).
Google Scholar - Gaskell, G. et al. Europeans and biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change? European Commission [online], (2010).
Google Scholar - Pentz, R. D., Billot, L. & Wendler, D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and white American cancer patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. 140, 733–739 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar - European Science Foundation. Population surveys and biobanking. European Science Foundation. [online], (2008).
- Tupasela, A. et al. Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Scand. J. Public Health 38, 46–52 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Acknowledgements
H.G. was supported by grants from the Austrian Genome Project (GEN-AU) for the projects GATiB (Genome Austrian Tissue Bank) and PrivatGen and by the European Union Programme for Research and Development (FP 7) project Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure (BBMRI) and by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2010-330-B00169). G.G. was funded by the Sensitive Technologies and European Public Ethics (STEPE) funded project and the Science in Society Programme of the European Commission's FP7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Herbert Gottweis is at the University of Vienna, Vienna, Universitätsstrasse 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; and Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, South Korea.,
Herbert Gottweis - and Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, South Korea.,
Herbert Gottweis - George Gaskell is at the London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK.,
George Gaskell - Johannes Starkbaum is at the University of Vienna, Universitätsstrasse 9/7, 1010 Vienna, Austria.,
Johannes Starkbaum
Authors
- Herbert Gottweis
- George Gaskell
- Johannes Starkbaum
Corresponding author
Correspondence toHerbert Gottweis.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gottweis, H., Gaskell, G. & Starkbaum, J. Connecting the public with biobank research: reciprocity matters.Nat Rev Genet 12, 738–739 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3083
- Published: 18 October 2011
- Issue date: November 2011
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3083