Signal integration in the control of shoot branching (original) (raw)
De Smet, I. & Jürgens, G. Patterning the axis in plants–auxin in control. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.17, 337–343 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lang, G. A., Early, J. D., Darnell, R. D. & Martin, G. C. Endo-, para- and ecodormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. HortScience.22, 371–377 (1987). Google Scholar
Snow, R. The young leaf as the inhibiting organ. New Phytol.28, 345–358 (1929). Google Scholar
Thimann, K. V. & Skoog, F. Studies on the growth hormone of plants III. The inhibitory action of the growth substance on bud development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA19, 714–716 (1933). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Booker, J. Chatfield, S. & Leyser, O. Auxin acts in xylem-associated or medullary cells to mediate apical dominance. Plant Cell15, 495–507 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Prasad, T. K. et al. Does auxin play a role in the release of apical dominance by shoot inversion in Ipomoea nil? Ann. Bot.71, 223–229 (1993). CAS Google Scholar
Petrásek, J. & Friml, J. Auxin transport routes in plant development. Development136, 2675–2688 (2009). PubMed Google Scholar
Li, C. & Bangerth, F. Autoinihibition of indoleacetic acid transport in the shoot of two-branched pea (Pisum sativum) plants and its relationship to correlative dominance. Physiol. Plant.106, 415–420 (1999). CAS Google Scholar
Snow, R. The transmission of inhibition through dead stretches of stem. Ann. Bot.43, 261–267 (1929). CAS Google Scholar
Sachs, T. & Thimann, K. The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance. Am. J. Bot.54, 136–144 (1967). CAS Google Scholar
Bangerth, F. Response of cytokinin concentration in the xylem exudates of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to decapitation and auxin treatment, and relationship to apical dominance. Planta194, 439–442 (1994). CAS Google Scholar
Beveridge, C. A., Ross, J. J. & Murfet, I. C. Branching in pea: action of genes Rms3 and Rms4. Plant Physiol.110, 859–865 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Beveridge, C. A., Symons, G. M., Murfet, I. C., Ross, J. J. & Rameau, C. The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic levels and reduced root-sap zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal(s). Plant Physiol.115, 1251–1258 (1997). CASPubMed Central Google Scholar
Morris, S. E., Turnbull, C. G., Murfet, I. C. & Beveridge, C. A. Mutational analysis of branching in pea. Evidence that Rms1 and Rms5 regulate the same novel signal. Plant Physiol.126, 1205–1213 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Napoli, C. Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dad1–1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol.111, 27–37 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Simons, J. L., Napoli, C. A., Janssen, B. J., Plummer, K. M. & Snowden, K. C. Analysis of the DECREASED APICAL DOMINANCE genes of petunia in the control of axillary branching. Plant Physiol.143, 697–706 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. G., Booker, J. P. & Leyser, H. M. Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant J.32, 255–262 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sorefan, K. et al. MAX4 and RMS1 are orthologous dioxygenase-like genes that regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis and pea. Genes Dev.17, 1469–1474 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Booker, J. et al. MAX3/CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule. Curr. Biol.14, 1232–1238 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Booker, J. et al. MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone. Dev. Cell8, 443–449 (2005). Shows that themaxmutants act in a single genetic pathway that regulates branching by producing the inhibitory hormone strigolactone. It also characterizesMAX1as a member of the cytochrome P450 family, which is involved in the synthesis of the hormone. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Umehara, M. et al. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature455, 195–200 (2008). Shows that the riced10andd17mutants have lower levels of strigolactones in roots and in root exudates than wild-type plants, and the branching phenotype of these strigolactone biosynthetic mutants is restored to wild-type levels by exogenous strigolactone application. By contrast, the strigolactone signalling mutantd3has normal or increased levels of strigolactones and cannot be rescued by exogenously applied strigolactones. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gomez-Roldan, V. et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature455, 189–194 (2008). Shows that the pearms1mutant has lower levels of strigolactones than wild-type plants, and branching levels of this strigolactone biosynthetic mutant are restored to wild-type levels by application of exogenous strigolactones. By contrast, the strigolactone signalling mutantrms4makes strigolactones and cannot be rescued by exogenously applied strigolactones. CAS Google Scholar
Petrásek, J. et al. PIN proteins perform a rate-limiting function in cellular auxin efflux. Science312, 914–918 (2006). PubMed Google Scholar
Wisniewska, J. et al. Polar PIN localization directs auxin flow in plants. Science312, 883 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wolters, H. & Jürgens, G. Survival of the flexible: hormonal growth control and adaptation in plant development. Nature Rev. Genet.10, 305–317 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Ljung, K., Bhalerao, R. P. & Sandberg, G. Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. Plant J.28, 465–474 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gälweiler, L. et al. Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science282, 2226–2230 (1998). PubMed Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, Y. & McCourt, P. Strigolactones: a new hormone with a past. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12, 556–561 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Akiyama, K., Matsuzaki, K. & Hayashi, H. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature435, 824–827 (2005). CAS Google Scholar
Kohlen, W. et al. Strigolactones are transported through the xylem and play a key role in shoot architectural response to phosphate deficiency in nonarbuscular mycorrhizal host Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.155, 974–987 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, C. M., Ertl, J. R., Leisner, S. M. & Chang, C. C. Localization of cytokinin biosynthetic sites in pea plants and carrot roots. Plant Physiol.78, 510–513 (1985). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nordström, A. et al., Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin-regulated development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 8039–8044 (2004). PubMed Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., Takei, K., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H. & Mori, H. Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. Plant J.45, 1028–1036 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Normanly, J. Approaching cellular and molecular resolution of auxin biosynthesis and metabolism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.2, a001594 (2010). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lehmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Hentrich, M. & Pollmann, S. Indole-3-acetamide-dependent auxin biosynthesis: a widely distributed way of indole-3-acetic acid production? Eur. J. Cell Biol.89, 895–905 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. The role of local biosynthesis of auxin and cytokinin in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.11, 16–22 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Werner, T. & Schmülling, T. Cytokinin action in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12, 527–538 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hirose, N. et al. Regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis, compartmentalization and translocation. 59, 75–83 (2008).
Kudo, T., Kiba, T. & Sakakibara, H. Metabolism and long-distance translocation of cytokinins. J. Integr. Plant Biol.52, 53–60 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bennett, T. et al. The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport. Curr. Biol.16, 553–563 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Prusinkiewicz, P. et al. Control of bud activation by an auxin transport switch. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA.106, 17431–17436 (2009). Presents a computational model for shoot branching control based on auxin transport canalization, and provides supporting experimental evidence fromA. thaliana. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Snyder, W. E. Some responses of plants to 2, 3, 5-triiodo-benzoic acid. Plant Physiol.23, 195–206 (1949). Google Scholar
Lazar, G. & Goodman, H. M. MAX1, a regulator of the flavonoid pathway, controls vegetative axillary bud outgrowth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 472–476 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lin, H. et al. DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. Plant Cell21, 1512–1525 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sachs, T. The control of patterned differentiation of vascular tissues. Adv. Bot. Res.9, 151–162 (1981). Google Scholar
Sauer, M. et al. Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARF-dependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity. Genes Dev.20, 2902–2911 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Scarpella, E., Marcos, D., Friml, J. & Berleth, T. Control of leaf vascular patterning by polar auxin transport. Genes Dev.20, 1015–1027 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vieten, A. et al. Functional redundancy of PIN proteins is accompanied by auxin-dependent cross-regulation of PIN expression. Development132, 4521–4531 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Paciorek, T. et al. Auxin inhibits endocytosis and promotes its own efflux from cells. Nature435, 1251–1256 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Heisler, M. G. et al. Patterns of auxin transport and gene expression during primordium development revealed by live imaging of the Arabidopsis inflorescence meristem. Curr. Biol.15, 1899–1911 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Robert, S. et al. ABP1 mediates auxin inhibition of clathrin-dependent endocytosis in Arabidopsis. Cell143, 111–121 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bayer, E. M. et al. Integration of transport-based models for phyllotaxis and midvein formation. Genes Dev.23, 373–384 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Balla, J., Kalousek, P., Reinöhl, V., Friml, J. & Procházka, S. Competitive canalization of PIN-dependent auxin flow from axillary buds controls pea bud outgrowth. Plant J.65, 571–577 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Snow, R. On the nature of correlative inhibition. New Phytol.36, 283–300 (1937). CAS Google Scholar
Ishikawa, S. et al. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol.46, 79–86 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zou, J. et al. The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. Plant J.48, 687–698 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Arite, T. et al. DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. Plant J.51, 1019–1029 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stirnberg, P., van De Sande, K. & Leyser, H. M. O. MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development129, 1131–1141 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Arite, T. et al. d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers. Plant Cell Physiol.50, 1416–1424 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Liu, W. et al. Identification and characterization of HTD2: a novel gene negatively regulating tiller bud outgrowth in rice. Planta230, 649–658 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gao, Z. et al. Dwarf88, a novel putative esterase gene affecting architecture of rice plant. Plant Mol. Biol.71, 265–276 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, X. et al. Branching genes are conserved across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are co-regulated by other long-distance signals. Plant Physiol.142, 1014–1026 (2006). Provides evidence for the conservation of the biosynthetic and signalling pathway (later shown to be the strigolactone pathway) betweenA. thalianaand pea:RMS4andRMS5in pea are shown to be orthologous toMAX2andMAX3inA. thaliana. Also shows that the strigolactone biosynthetic genes in pea are regulated by auxin, which supports the second messenger model of bud outgrowth control. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Drummond, R. S. et al. Petunia hybrida CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE7 is involved in the production of negative and positive branching signals in petunia. Plant Physiol.151, 1867–1877 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Snowden, K. C. et al. The decreased apical dominance1/Petunia hybrida CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 gene affects branch production and plays a role in leaf senescence, root growth, and flower development. Plant Cell17, 746–759 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Crawford, S. et al. Strigolactones enhance competition between shoot branches by dampening auxin transport. Development137, 2905–2913 (2010). Shows that strigolactone application reduces PAT and PIN1 accumulation at the membrane, and that strigolactones enhance competition between the buds, supporting the auxin transport canalization-based model. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Brewer, P. B., Dun, E. A., Ferguson, B. J., Rameau, C. & Beveridge, C. A. Strigolactone acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth in pea and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.150, 482–493 (2009). Presents results supporting the second messenger model for bud activation, for example by showing that the application of strigolactones directly to the bud inhibits bud activation, and that the branchiness of theA. thalianaauxin response mutantaxr1can be reduced to a wild-type level by exogenous application of strigolactones. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Beveridge, C. A., Symons G. M. & Turnbull C. G. Auxin inhibition of decapitation-induced branching is dependent on graft-transmissible signals regulated by genes Rms1 and Rms2. Plant Physiol.123, 689–698 (2000). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang, J., Zhao, L., Challis, R. & Leyser, O. Strigolactone regulation of shoot branching in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum). J. Exp. Bot.61, 3069–3078 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Stirnberg, P., Furner, I. J. & Leyser, H. M. O. MAX2 participates in an SCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J.50, 80–94 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Foo, E. et al., The branching gene RAMOSUS1 mediates interactions among two novel signals and auxin in pea. Plant Cell17, 464–474 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hayward, A., Stirnberg, P., Beveridge, C. A. & Leyser, O. Interactions between auxin and strigolactone in shoot branching control. Plant Physiol.151, 400–412 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shimizu-Sato, S., Tanaka, M. & Mori, H. Auxin-cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Mol. Biol.69, 429–435 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
To, J. P. C. et al. Type-A Arabidopsis response regulators are partially redundant negative regulators of cytokinin signalling. Plant Cell16, 658–671 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Morris, S. E., Cox, M. C. H., Ross, J. J., Krisantini, S. & Beveridge, C. A. Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiol.138, 1665–1672 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Doebley, J., Stec, A. & Hubbard, L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature386, 485–488 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Aguilar-Martinez, J. A., Poza-Carrion, C. & Cubas, P. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell19, 458–472 (2007). IdentifiesTB1homologues inA. thaliana, which apparently act exclusively in the bud.Identifes a putative role of one of the homologues,BRC1, as a signal integrator in the regulation of bud activity. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kebrom, T. H., Burson, B. L. & Finlayson, S. A. Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol.140, 1109–1117 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Takeda, T. et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J.33, 513–520 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hubbard, L., McSteen, P., Doebley, J. & Hake, S. Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics162, 1927–1935 (2002). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Minakuchi, K. et al. FINE CULM1 (FC1) works downstream of strigolactones to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds in rice. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 1127–1135 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. G. N., Raymond, M. A. A., Dodd, I. C. & Morris, S. E. Rapid increases in cytokinin concentration in lateral buds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) during release of apical dominance. Planta202, 271–276 (1997). CAS Google Scholar
Werner, T., Motyka, V., Strand, M. & Schmulling, T. Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 10487–10492 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Li, C. & Bangerth, F. Stimulatory effect of cytokinins and interaction with IAA on the release of lateral buds of pea plants from apical dominance. J. Plant Physiol.160, 1059–1063 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Finlayson, S. A., Krishnareddy, S. R., Kebrom, T. H. & Casal, J. J. Phytochrome regulation of branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.152, 1914–1927 (2010). A detailed study of the role of PHYB in shoot branching control inA. thalianathat links hormonal pathways to PHYB-mediated responses. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Salisbury, F. J., Hall, A., Grierson, C. S. & Halliday, K. J. Phytochrome coordinates Arabidopsis shoot and root development. Plant J.50, 429–438 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Devlin, P. F., Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.133, 1617–1629 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Carabelli, M. et al. Canopy shade causes a rapid and transient arrest in leaf development through auxin-induced cytokinin oxidase activity. Genes Dev.21, 1863–1868 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Takei, K., Sakakibara, H., Taniguchi, M. & Sugiyama, T. Nitrogen-dependent accumulation of cytokinins in root and the translocation to leaf: implication of cytokinin species that induces gene expression of maize response regulator. Plant Cell Physiol.42, 85–93 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Forde, B. G. Local and long-range signaling pathways regulating plant responses to nitrate. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.53, 203–224 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Takei, K., Takahashi, T., Sugiyama, T., Yamaya, T. & Sakakibara, H. Multiple routes communicating nitrogen availability from roots to shoots: a signal transduction pathway mediated by cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot.53, 971–977 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Takei, K. et al. AtIPT3 is a key determinant of nitrate-dependent cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol.45, 1053–1062 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Matsumoto-Kitano, M. & Kakimoto, T. Expression of cytokinin biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase genes in Arabidopsis: tissue specificity and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and nitrate. Plant J.37, 128–138 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, R. et al. Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.136, 2512–2522 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Horgan, J. M. & Waering, P. F. Cytokinins and the growth responses of seedlings of Betula pendula Roth. and Acer pseudoplantus L. to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency. J. Exp. Bot.31, 525–532 (1980). CAS Google Scholar
Lan, P., Li, W. & Fischer, R. Arabidopsis thaliana wild type, pho1, and pho2 mutant plants show different responses to exogenous cytokinins. Plant Physiol. Biochem.44, 343–350 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
López-Ráez, J. A. et al. Tomato strigolactones are derived from carotenoids and their biosynthesis is promoted by phosphate starvation. New Phytol.178, 863–874 (2008). PubMed Google Scholar
Yoneyama, K. et al. Nitrogen deficiency as well as phosphorus deficiency in sorghum promotes the production and exudation of 5-deoxystrigol, the host recognition signal for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and root parasites. Planta227, 125–132 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Umehara, M. et al. Contribution of strigolactones to the inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth under phosphate deficiency in rice. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 1118–1126 (2010). Shows that strigolactones are required to mediate the inhibition of rice shoot branching in response to Pideprivation in soil. It shows that strigolactone-deficient mutants do not reduce branching in response to phosphate deficiency, and the expression of the strigolactone biosynthetic genes is induced by these conditions. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dun, E. A., Hanan, J. & Beveridge, C. A. Computational modeling and molecular physiology experiments reveal new insights into shoot branching in pea. Plant Cell21, 3459–3472 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar