The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition (original) (raw)

References

  1. Quillian, M. R. in Semantic Information Processing (ed. Minsky, M.) 227–270 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1968).
    Google Scholar
  2. Warrington, E. K. The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 635–657 (1975). Classic paper first reporting the syndrome that is now known as semantic dementia.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Snowden, J. S., Goulding, P. J. & Neary, D. Semantic dementia: a form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy. Behav. Neurol. 2, 167–182 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Hodges, J. R., Graham, N. & Patterson, K. Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory 3, 463–495 (1995).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Bozeat, S., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. R. When objects lose their meanings: what happens to their use? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. (in the press).
  6. Rogers, T. T., McClelland, J. L. Patterson, K., Lambon-Ralph, M. A. & Hodges, J. R. A recurrent connectionist model of semantic dementia. Cogn. Neurosci. Soc. Annual Meeting <http://cognet.mit.edu/posters/poster.tcl?publication_id=3664> (1999).
  7. Keil, F. C. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979).
    Book Google Scholar
  8. Mandler, J. M. How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychol. Rev. 99, 587–604 (1992).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Mandler, J. M. Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. J. Cogn. Dev. 1, 3–36 (2000). Reviews 10 years of research on progressive differentiation of conceptual knowledge in infancy.
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Mandler, J. M., Bauer, P. J. & McDonough, L. Separating the sheep from the goats: differentiating global categories. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 263–298 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Mandler, J. M. & McDonough, L. Concept formation in infancy. Cogn. Dev. 8, 291–318 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Pauen, S. The global-to-basic shift in infants' categorical thinking: first evidence from a longitudinal study. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 26, 492–499 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Rakison, D. in Early Concept and Category Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion (eds Oakes, L. M. & Rakison, D. H.) (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, in the press).
  14. Mareschal, D. Infant object knowledge: current trends and controversies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 408–416 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Quinn, P. C. in Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (ed. Goswami, U.) 84–101 (Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2002).
    Book Google Scholar
  16. Collins, A. M. & Quillian, M. R. Retrieval time from semantic memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 8, 240–248 (1969).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. McCloskey, M. & Glucksberg, S. Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: implications for models of semantic memory. Cogn. Psychol. 11, 1037 (1979).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, G. L. & Brownell, H. H. Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11, 70–84 (1985).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J. & Smith, E. E. Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12, 1–20 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Rosch, E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 104, 192–233 (1975).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Rumelhart, D. E. & Ortony, A. in Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge (eds Anderson, R. C., Sprio, R. J. & Montague, W. E.) 99–135 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1976).
    Google Scholar
  22. Rumelhart, D. E. & Abrahamson, A. A. A model of analogical reasoning. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 1–28 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Anderson, J. R. The Adaptive Character of Thought (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  24. Heit, E. in Rational Models of Cognition (eds Oaksford, M. & Chater, N.) 248–274 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  25. Heit, E. Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7, 569–592 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Medin, D. L. & Shaffer, M. M. Context theory of classification learning. Psychol. Rev. 85, 207–238 (1978).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. McClelland, J. L. Retrieving general and specific information from stored knowledge of specifics. Proc. Third Annu. Conf. Cogn. Sci. Soc. 170–172 (1981).
  28. Nosofsky, R. M. Attention, similiarity and the identification-categorization relationship. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 115, 39–57 (1986).
    CAS Google Scholar
  29. Kruschke, J. K. ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychol. Rev. 99, 22–44 (1992).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Nosofsky, R. M. & Palmeri, T. J. An exemplar-based random-walk model of speeded classification learning. Psychol. Rev. 104, 266–300 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, G. L. The Big Book of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2002). An up-to-date review of the literature on concepts and semantic cognition.
    Book Google Scholar
  32. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & the PDP Research Group. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1: Foundations (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986). Introduces the parallel distributed processing framework. Chapter 6 describes back-propagation, which is briefly presented in reference 35.
    Book Google Scholar
  33. Hinton, G. E. in Parallel Models of Associative Memory (eds Hinton, G. E. & Anderson, J. A.) 161–187 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1981).
    Google Scholar
  34. Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E. & Sejnowski, T. J. A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cogn. Sci. 9, 147–169 (1985).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536 (1986).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Williams, R. J. & Zipser, D. A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 1, 270–280 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Hinton, G. E. & McClelland, J. L. in Neural Information Processing Systems (ed. Anderson, D. Z.) 358–366 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1988).
    Google Scholar
  38. Mazzoni, P., Andersen, R. A. & Jordan, M. I. A more biologically plausible learning rule for neural networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4433–4437 (1991).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  39. O'Reilly, R. C. Biologically plausible error-driven learning using local activation differences: the generalized recirculation algorithm. Neural Comput. 8, 895–938 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Devlin, J. T., Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S. & Seidenberg, M. S. Category specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: a computational account. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 77–94 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Farah, M. J. & McClelland, J. L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality-specificity and emergent category-specificity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120, 339–357 (1991).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Gotts, S. & Plaut, D. C. The impact of synaptic depression following brain damage: a connectionist account of 'access/refractory' and 'degraded-store' semantic impairments. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 187–213 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Hinton, G. E. in Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology (ed. Morris, R. G. M.) 46–61 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  44. Hinton, G. E. & Shallice, T. Lesioning a connectionist network: investigations of acquired dyslexia. Technical Report No. CRG-TR-89–3 (University of Toronto, Department of Computer Science, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1989).
  45. Lambon Ralph, M. A., McClelland, J. L., Patterson, K., Galton, C. J. & Hodges, J. R. No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 341–356 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  46. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R. & Seidenberg, M. S. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 126, 99–130 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Plaut, D. C. Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: a computational account of optic aphasia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 19, 603–639 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Plaut, D. C. & Booth, J. R. Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. Psychol. Rev. 107, 786–823 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Plaut, D. C. & Shallice, T. Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 10, 377–500 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R. & Levy, J. P. Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain Lang. 75, 195–231 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Tyler, L. K. & Moss, H. E. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 244–252 (2001).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Mareschal, D., French, R. M. & Quinn, P. C. A connectionist account of asymmetric category learning in early infancy. Dev. Psychol. 36, 635–645 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Mareschal, D., Plunkett, K. & Harris, P. A computational and neuropsychological account of object-oriented behaviours in infancy. Dev. Sci. 2, 306–317 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  54. McClelland, J. L. in Parallel Distribured Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology (Morris, R. G. M.) 8–45 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  55. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J. L., Johnson, M. H. & Siegler, R. S. Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process accout of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychol. Rev. 104, 686–713 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Munakata, Y. & McClelland, J. L. Connectionist models of development. Dev. Sci. (in the press).
  57. Quinn, P. C. & Johnson, M. H. The emergence of perceptual category representations in young infants: A connectionist analysis. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 66, 236–263 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Schyns, P. G. A modular neural network model of concept acquisition. Cogn. Sci. 15, 461–508 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
  59. Shultz, T. R., Mareschal, D. & Schmidt, W. C. Modeling cognitive development of balance scale phenomena. Machine Learn. 16, 57–86 (1994).
    Google Scholar
  60. Rumelhart, D. E. in An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks (eds Zornetzer, S. F., Davis, J. L. & Lau, C.) 405–420 (Academic, New York, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  61. Rumelhart, D. E. & Todd, P. M. in Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artifical Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience (eds Meyer, D. E. & Kornblum, S.) 3–30 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1993).
    Google Scholar
  62. Flavell, J. The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget (Van Nostrand, New York, 1963).
    Book Google Scholar
  63. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L. & O'Reilly, R. C. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 102, 419–457 (1995). Elaborates the complementary learning system theory that is described briefly in the current article.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Quinn, P. C. & Johnson, M. H. Global-before-basic object categorization in connectionist networks and 2-month-old infants. Infancy 1, 31–46 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Bloom, P. How Children Learn the Meaning of Words (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000).
    Book Google Scholar
  66. McCloskey, M. & Cohen, N. J. in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (ed. Bower, G. H.) 109–165 (Academic, New York, 1989).
    Google Scholar
  67. Marr, D. Simple memory: a theory for archicortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 23–81 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  68. Milner, P. A cell assembly theory of hippocampal amnesia. Neuropsychologia 27, 23–30 (1989).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Rolls, E. T. in An Introduction to Neural and Electronic Networks (eds Zornetzer, S. F., Davis, J. L. & Lau, C.) 73–90 (Academic, San Diego, California, 1990).
    Google Scholar
  70. Alvarez, P. & Squire L. R. Memory consolidation and the medial temporal lobe: a simple network model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7041–7045 (1994).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  71. Scoville, W. B. & Milner, B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurosurg. Neurol. Psychiatry 20, 11–21 (1957).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  72. Squire, L. R. Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychol. Rev. 99, 195–231 (1992). A useful overview of amnesia resulting from lesions to the medial temporal lobes.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Nadel, L. & Moscovitch, M. Memory consolidation, retrograde amnesia and the hippocampal complex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 217–227 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Cipolotti, L. et al. Long-term retrograde amnesia: the crucial role of the hippocampus. Neuropsychologia 39, 151–172 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Norman, K. A. & O'Reilly, R. C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary learning systems approach. Psychol. Rev. (in the press).
  76. Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S. & Funnell, E. Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain 115, 1783–1806 (1992).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Garrard, P. & Hodges, J. R. Semantic dementia: clinical, radiological, and pathological perspectives. J. Neurol. 247, 409–422 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Rogers, T. T. & McClelland, J. L. Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, in the press). A full presentation of the PDP approach.
  79. Mervis, C. B. in Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization (ed. Neisser, U.) 201–233 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987).
    Google Scholar
  80. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. & Kosslyn, S. M. Pictures and names: making the connection. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 31–53 (1984).
    Google Scholar
  81. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D. & Boyes-Braem, P. Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 382–439 (1976).
    Article Google Scholar
  82. Brown, R. A First Language (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1973).
    Book Google Scholar
  83. MacWhinney, B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2000).
    Google Scholar
  84. Carey, S. Conceptual Change in Childhood (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985). Seminal studies of conceptual reorganization in children.
    Google Scholar
  85. Keil, F. C. in The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on Biology and Cognition (eds Carey, S. & Gelman, R.) 237–256 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1991).
    Google Scholar
  86. Murphy, G. L. & Medin, D. L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychol. Rev. 92, 289–316 (1985).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. M. in Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (eds Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelmans, S. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994). One of the most explicit attempts to articulate the nature of 'theory theory'.
    Google Scholar
  88. Wilson, R. A. & Keil, F. C. in Explanation and Cognition (eds Keil, F. C. & Wilson, R. A.) 87–114 (MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2000).
    Google Scholar
  89. Gelman, R. First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate/inanimate distinction as examples. Cogn. Sci. 14, 79–106 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  90. Macario, J. F. Young children's use of color in classification: Foods and canonically colored objects. Cogn. Dev. 6, 17–46 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
  91. Gelman, S. A. & Markman, E. M. Categories and induction in young children. Cognition 23, 183–209 (1986).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962).
    Google Scholar
  93. Ahn, W. -K. Why are different features central for natural kinds and artifacts?: The role of causal status in determining feature centrality. Cognition 69, 135–178 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Ahn, W., Gelman, S., Amsterlaw, J. A., Hohenstein, J. & Kalish, C. W. Causal status effect in children's categorization. Cognition 76, B35–B43 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Gopnik, A. & Sobel, D. M. Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction. Child Dev. 71, 1205–1222 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Keil, f. Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989). Presents key findings relevant to the role of causal mechanisms in determining what kind of thing an object is.
    Google Scholar
  97. Elman, J. L. Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14, 179–211 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  98. Cleeremans, A., Servan-Schreiber, D. & McClelland, J. L. Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks. Neural Comput. 1, 372–381 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  99. Rogers, T. T. & Griffin, R. in Proc. 13th Biennial Int. Conf. Infant Studies (eds Schmuckler, M. A. Trehub, S. E. & Kosarev, M. F.) 625 (International Society for Infant Studies, 2002).
    Google Scholar
  100. St. John, M. F. The story Gestalt: a model of knowledge-intensive processes in text comprehension. Cogn. Sci. 16, 271–306 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  101. Marcus, G. F. The Algebraic Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001). Critique of the parallel distributed processing framework, offering an alternative perspective on the basic nature of human cognitive and semantic processing.
    Book Google Scholar
  102. Carey, S. & Spelke, E. in Domain-Specific Knowledge and Conceptual Change (ed. Hirschfeld, L. A.) 169–200 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  103. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. & Wilson, C. D. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. (in the press).
  104. Damasio, A. R. The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Comput. 1, 123–132 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  105. Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L. & Ungerleider, L. G. Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270, 102–105 (1995).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M. & Patterson, K. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipularity and action in tool representation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 30–46 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  107. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M. & Patterson, K. Larger, colorful, or noisy? Attribute- and modality-specific activations during retrieval of perceptual attribut knowledge. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 1, 207–221 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  108. Martin, A. & Chao, L. L. Semantic memory in the brain: structure and processes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 194–201 (2001). A useful contemporary review of findings on semantic representation in the brain.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  109. Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107, 829–854 (1984). Seminal report of category-specific deficits in semantic knowledge.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  110. Rogers, T. T. & Plaut, D. C. in Category Specificity in Mind and Brain (eds Forde, E. & Humphreys, G.) 251–289 (Psychology Press, East Sussex, UK, 2002).
    Google Scholar
  111. Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., Devlin, J. T., Kempler, D. & Seidenberg, M. S. Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Lang. 57, 254–279 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  112. Allport, D. A. in Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (eds Newman, S. K. & Epstein, R.) 207–244 (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1985).
    Google Scholar
  113. Caramazza, A. & Shelton, J. R. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 1–34 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  114. Warrington, E. K. & McCarthy, R. Categories of knowledge: further fractionation and an attempted integration. Brain 110, 1273–1296 (1987).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  115. Jacobs, R. A. & Jordan, M. I. Computational consequences of a bias toward short connections. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 4, 323–336 (1992).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  116. Kohonen, T. The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 78, 1464–1480 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  117. Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 6, 174–215 (1980). | PubMed
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  118. Gelman, R. & Williams, E. M. in Handbook of Child Psychology, Volume II: Cognition, Perception and Development (eds Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R.) 575–630 (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  119. Plaut, D. C. Double dissociation without modularity: evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 17, 291–321 (1995).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references