The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition (original) (raw)

References

1. Fodor, J. A. The Language of Thought (Crowell, New York, 1975).
   Google Scholar
2. Wilkinson, D. & Halligan, P. W. Stimulus symmetry affects the bisection of figures but not lines: evidence from event-related fMRI. NeuroImage 20, 1756–1764 (2003).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Nobre, A. C., Coull, J. T., Walsh, V. & Frith, C. D. Brain activations during visual search: contributions of search efficiency versus feature binding. NeuroImage 18, 91–103 (2003).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Maril, A., Simons, J. S., Mitchell, J. P., Schwartz, B. L. & Schachter, D. L. Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 18, 827–836 (2003).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Toni, I., Rowe, J., Stephan, K. E. & Passingham, R. E. Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. Cereb. Cortex 12, 1040–1047 (2002).
   Article Google Scholar
6. Brooks, J. C., Nurmikko, T. J., Bimson, W. E., Singh, K. D. & Roberts, N. fMRI of thermal pain: effects of stimulus laterality and attention. NeuroImage 15, 293–301 (2002).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Opitz, B., Rinne, T., Mecklinger, A., von Cramon, D. Y. & Shröger, E. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. NeuroImage 15, 167–174 (2002).
   Article Google Scholar
8. Inui, T. et al. Neural substrates for depth perception of the Necker Cube: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects. Neurosci. Lett. 282, 145–148 (2000).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
9. Sterzer, P., Russ, M. O., Preibisch, C. & Kleinschmidt, A. Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion. NeuroImage 15, 908–916 (2002).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Keightley, M. L. et al. An fMRI study investigating cognitive modulation of brain regions associated with emotional processing of visual stimuli. Neuropsychologia 41, 585–596 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Grossman, M. et al. The neural basis for categorization in semantic memory. NeuroImage 17, 1549–1561 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Peng, D. et al. Neural basis of the non-attentional processing of briefly presented words. Hum. Brain Mapp. 18, 215–221 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Handy, T. C., Grafton, S. T., Shroff, N. M., Ketay, S. & Gazzaniga, M. S. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neurosci. 6, 421–427 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Vingerhoets, G. et al. Regional brain activity during different paradigms of mental rotation in healthy volunteers: a positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage 13, 381–391 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Suzuki, M. et al. Neural basis of temporal context memory: a functional MRI study. NeuroImage 17, 1790–1796 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Zilles, K. & Fink, G. R. Are action and perception in near and far space additive or interactive factors? NeuroImage 18, 837–846 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Paulus, M. P., Hozack, N., Frank, L. & Brown, G. G. Error rate and outcome predictability affect neural activation in prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate during decision-making. NeuroImage 15, 836–846 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S. M., Stose, S., Thompson, W. L. & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb. Cortex 13, 830–836 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., Beig, S. & Craik, F. I. An examination of the effects of stimulus type, encoding task, and functional connectivity on the role of right prefrontal cortex in recognition memory. NeuroImage 14, 556–571 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
20. Bub, D. N. Methodological issues confronting PET and fMRI studies of cognitive function. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 17, 467–484 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Gusnard, D. A. & Raichle, M. E. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 685–694 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
22. Kosik, K. S. Beyond phrenology, at last. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 234–239 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Shulman, R. Interview. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8, 474–480 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Donders, F. C. On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol. 30, 412–431 (1969).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
25. Marshall, J. C. & Gurd, J. M. in The Churchlands and their Critics (ed. McCauley, R. N.) 176–191 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1996).
    Google Scholar
26. Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1970).
    Book Google Scholar
27. Fink, G. R. et al. Line bisection judgements implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 54, 1324–1331 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
28. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. & Zilles, K. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. NeuroImage 14, S59–S67 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
29. Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., Weiss, P. H., Toni, I. & Zilles, K. Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgments: evidence form modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia 40, 119–130 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
30. Marr, D. Vision (Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
    Google Scholar
31. Pylyshyn, Z. Computation and cognition: issues in the foundation of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 3, 111–134 (1980).
    Article Google Scholar
32. Downing, P., Liu, J. & Kanwisher, N. Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG. Neuropsychologia 39, 1329–1342 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
33. De Renzi, E. in Aspects of Face Processing (eds Ellis, H. D., Jeeves, M. A., Newcombe, F. & Young, A.) 243–252 (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1986).
    Book Google Scholar
34. Whiteley, A. M. & Warrington, E. K. Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological and anatomical study of three patients. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 40, 395–403 (1977).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
35. Farah, M. J. Is face recognition 'special'? Evidence from neuropsychology. Behav. Brain Res. 76, 181–189 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
36. Gauthier, I., Behrmann, M. & Tarr, M. J. Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 349–370 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
37. Tovée, M. J. Is face processing special? Neuron 21, 1239–1242 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
38. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C. & Anderson, A. W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neurosci. 3, 191–197 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
39. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P. & Gore, J. C. Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neurosci. 2, 568–573 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
40. Kanwisher, N. Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neurosci. 3, 759–763 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
41. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol 1: Foundations (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986).
    Google Scholar
42. Müller, H. J., Humphreys, G. W. & Donnelly, N. Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form conjunction targets. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percep. Perform. 20, 235–238 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Wolfe, J. M. Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
44. Churchland, P. S. & Sejnowski, T. in Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience (eds Lister, R. G. & Weingartner, H. J.) 3–23 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991).
    Google Scholar
45. Rizzolatti, G., Mattelli, M. & Pavesi, G. Deficits in attention and movement following the removal of the postarcuate (area 6) and prearcuate (area 8) cortex in macaque monkeys. Brain 106, 655–673 (1983).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Halligan, P. W. & Marshall, J. C. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350, 498–500 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
47. Cowey, A., Small, M. & Ellis, S. Visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32, 1059–1066 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
48. Barrett, A. M., Crucian G. P., Kim, M. & Heilman, K. M. Attentional grasp in far extrapersonal space after thalamic infarction. Neuropsychologia 38, 778–784 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
49. Cowey, A., Small, M. & Ellis, S. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia 37, 1–6 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
50. Tegnér, R. & Levander, M. The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 54, 882–887 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
51. Weiss, P. H. et al. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 123, 2531–2541 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
52. Wilkinson, D. & Halligan, P. W. The effects of stimulus size on bisection judgments in near and far space. Visual Cogn. 19, 319–340 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
53. Price, C. J. & Friston, K. J. Scanning patients with tasks they can perform. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8, 102–108 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
54. Price, C. J. & Friston, K. J. Degeneracy and redundancy in cognitive anatomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 151–152 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Price, C. J., Mummery, C. J., Moore, R. S., Frackowiak, R. S. & Friston, K. J. Delineating necessary and sufficient neural systems with functional imaging studies of neuropsychological patients. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 371–382 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
56. Churchland, P. S. Neurophilosophy (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986).
    Google Scholar
57. Smith, E. E. Research strategies for functional neuroimaging: a comment on the interview with R. G. Shulman. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 167–169 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
58. Sternberg, S. The discovery of processing stages: extension of Donder's method. Acta Psychologia 30, 276–315 (1969).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Frackowiak, R. S. J., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J. & Mazziotta, J. C. Human Brain Function (Academic Press, San Diego, 1997).
    Google Scholar
60. Meyer, D. E., Irwin, D. E., Osman, A. M. & Kounios, J. The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. Psychol. Rev. 95, 183–237 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
61. Sternberg, S. in Methods, Models and Conceptual Issues: An Invitation to Cognitive Science (eds Scarborough, D. & Sternberg, S.) Vol. 4. 1–950 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).
    Google Scholar
62. Luce, R. D. Response Times (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1986).
    Google Scholar
63. Pachella, R. G. in Human Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition (ed. Kantowitz, B.) 41–82 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 1974).
    Google Scholar
64. Editorial. Analyzing functional imaging studies. Nature Neurosci. 4, 333 (2001).
65. Coltheart, M. in Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology 3rd edn Vol. 4 (ed. Wixted, J.) 139–174 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002).
    Google Scholar
66. Coltheart, M. Modularity and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 115–120 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
67. Van Orden, G. C. & Paap, K. R. Functional neuroimages fail to discover pieces of mind in parts of the brain. Philos. Sci. 64, S85–S94 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
68. Searle, J. R. The Rediscovery of the Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992).
    Google Scholar

Download references