Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective (original) (raw)

References

1. Mandler, G. Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol. Rev. 87, 252–271 (1980).
   Article Google Scholar
2. Atkinson, R. C. & Juola, J. F., in Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology (eds Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C. & Suppes, P.) 243–290 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1974).
   Google Scholar
3. Brown, M. W. & Aggleton, J. P. Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 51–61 (2001).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Aggleton, A. P. & Brown, M. W. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 455–463 (2006).
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
5. Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. R. & Ranganath, C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 123–152 (2007).
   Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
6. Rugg, M. D & Yonelinas, A. P. Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 313–319 (2003).
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
7. Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L. & Clark, R. E. The medial temporal lobe. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 279–306 (2004).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
8. Wixted, J. T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol. Rev. 114, 152–176 (2007).
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
9. Burwell, R. D., Suzuki, W. A., Insausti, R. & Amaral, D. G. in Perception, Memory, and Emotion: Frontiers in Neuroscience. (Eds Ono, T., McNaughton, B. L., Molotchnikoff, S., Rolls, E. T. & Nishijo, H.) 95–110 (Elsevier, New York, 1996).
   Google Scholar
10. Baddeley, A., Vargha-Khadem, F. & Mishkin, M. Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 357–369 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
11. Bastin, C. et al. Dissociation between recall and recognition memory performance in an amnesic patient with hippocampal damage following carbon monoxide poisoning. Neurocase 10, 330–344 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
12. Holdstock, J. S. et al. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? Hippocampus 12, 341–351 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
13. Mayes, A. R., Holdstock, J. S., Isaac, C. L., Hunkin, N. M. & Roberts, N. Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 12, 325–340 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
14. Yonelinas, A. P. et al. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neurosci. 5, 1236–1241 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
15. Wixted, J. T. & Squire, L. R. Recall and recognition are equally impaired in patients with selective hippocampal damage. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 58–66 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
16. Manns, J. R., Hopkins, R. O., Reed, J. M., Kitchener, E. G. & Squire, L. R. Recognition memory and the human hippocampus. Neuron 37, 171–180 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
17. Kopelman, M. D. et al. Recall and recognition memory in amnesia: patients with hippocampal, medial temporal, temporal lobe or frontal pathology. Neuropsychologia 45, 1232–1246 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
18. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T. & Cohen, N. J. Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behav. Brain Sci. 17, 449–472 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Cohen, N. J. et al. Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies. Hippocampus 9, 83–98 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
20. Giovanello, K. S., Schnye, D. M. & Verfaellie, M. A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: evidence from a fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition. Hippocampus 14, 5–8 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
21. Yonelinas, A. P. & Parks, C. M. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review. Psychol. Bull. 133, 800–832 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
22. Gold, J. J. et al. Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9351–9356 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
23. Stark, C. E., Bayley, P. J. & Squire, L. R. Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage limited to the hippocampal region. Learn. Mem. 9, 238–242 (2002).
    Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
24. Kan, I. P., Giovanello, K. S., Schnyer, D. M., Makris, N. & Verfaellie, M. Role of the medial temporal lobes in relational memory: neuropsychological evidence from a cued recognition paradigm. Neuropsychologia 45, 2589–2597 (2007).
    Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
25. Gold, J. J., Hopkins, R. O. & Squire, L. R. Single-item memory, associative memory, and the human hippocampus. Learn. Mem. 13, 644–649 (2006).
    Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
26. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R. & Ramus, S. Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system. Hippocampus 4, 483–495 (1994).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
27. Mumby, D. G. Perspectives on object-recognition memory following hippocampal damage: lessons from studies in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 127, 159–181 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
28. Egan, J. P. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. (Tech. Note AFCRC-TN-58–51). Bloomington: Indiana Univ., Hearing and Communication Laboratory (1958).
    Google Scholar
29. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A. & Reeder, J. A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal detection model. Psychol. Rev. 111, 588–616 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
30. Yonelinas, A. P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 1341–1354 (1994).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
31. Aggleton, J. P., et al. Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology. Neuropsychologia 43, 1810–1823 (2005).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
32. Fortin, N. J., Wright, S. P. & Eichenbaum, H. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 431, 188–191 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
33. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M. & Knight, R. T. Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: convergence of remember–know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology 12, 323–339 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
34. Heathcote, A. Item recognition memory and the ROC. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1210–1230 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
35. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Reeder, J. A. & Wong, M. The remember response: subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 865–873 (2005). This paper provides a demonstration that 'remember' responses are based on a continuous memory-strength signal, not a threshold recollection signal. The reported experiments also show why, in the past, some results have seemed to suggest otherwise.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
36. Slotnick, S. D. & Dodson, C. S. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem. Cogn. 33, 151–170 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
37. Smith, D. G. & Duncan, M. J. Testing theories of recognition memory by predicting performance across paradigms. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 615–625 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
38. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A. & Adams, J. K. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 500–513 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
39. Koriat, A., Levy-Sadot, R., Edry, E. & de Marcas, G. What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1095–1105 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
40. Slotnick, S. D., Klein, S. A., Dodson, C. S. & Shimamura, A. P. An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1499–1517 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
41. Wais, P. E., Wixted, J. T., Hopkins, R. O. & Squire, L. R. The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuron 49, 459–466 (2006). This study shows that the component processes (recollection and familiarity) that determine the shape of the ROC are both operative in memory-impaired patients with hippocampal lesions.
    Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
42. Rempel-Clower, N. L., Zola, S. M., Squire, L. R. & Amara, D. G. Three cases of enduring memory impairment after bilateral damage limited to the hippocampal formation. J. Neurosci. 16, 5233–5255 (1996).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
43. Holdstock, J. S., Mayes, A. R., Gong, Q., Roberts, N. & Kapur, N. Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 15, 203–215 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
44. Moscovitch, D. & McAndrews, M. P. Material-specific deficits in remembering in patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy and excisions. Neuropsychologia 40, 1335–1342 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
45. Gardiner, J. & Richardson-Klavehn, A., in The Oxford Handbook of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M.) 229–244 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2000).
    Google Scholar
46. Donaldson, W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Mem. Cogn. 24, 523–533 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
47. Dunn, J. C. Remember–know: a matter of confidence. Psychol. Rev. 111, 524–542 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
48. Wixted, J. T. & Stretch, V. In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 616–641 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
49. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Hicks, J. L. & Hautus, M. Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember–know judgments using signal-detection and threshold models. Mem. Cogn. 34, 1598–1614 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
50. Wais, P. E., Mickes, L. & Wixted, J. T. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. (in the press).
51. Wirth, S. et al. Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations. Science 300, 1578–1581 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
52. Davachi, L., Mitchell, J. P. & Wagner, A. D. Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2157–2162 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
53. Kensinger, E. A. & Schacter, D. L. Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, but not source, information for positive and negative stimuli. J. Neurosci. 26, 2564–2570 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
54. Ranganath, C. et al. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 42, 2–13 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Cansino, S., Maquet, P., Dolan, R. J. & Rugg, M. D. Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cereb. Cortex 12, 1048–1056 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
56. Dobbins, I. G., Rice, H. J., Wagner, A. D. & Schacter, D. L. Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition. Neuropsychologia 41, 318–333 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
57. Weis, S. et al. Process dissociation between contextual retrieval and item recognition. Neuroreport 15, 2729–2733 (2004).
    PubMed Google Scholar
58. Yonelinas, A. P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. J. Mem. Lang. 46, 441–517 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Otten, L. J. Fragments of a larger whole: retrieval cues constrain observed neural correlates of memory encoding. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2030–2038 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
60. Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S. & Cabeza, R. Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: recollection, familiarity, and novelty. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 1902–1911 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
61. Eldridge, L. L., Knowlton, B. J., Furmanski, C. S., Bookheimer, S. Y. & Engel, S. A. Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neurosci. 3, 1149–1152 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
62. Henson, R. N., Rugg, M. D., Shallice, T., Josephs, O. & Dolan, R. Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: an event-related fMRI study. J. Neurosci. 19, 3962–3972 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
63. Montaldi, D., Spencer, T. J., Roberts, N. & Mayes, A. R. The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus 16, 504–520 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
64. Yonelinas, A. P., Otten, L., Shaw, K. N. & Rugg, M. D. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity-strength in recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 25, 3002–3008 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
65. Uncapher, M. R. & Rugg, M. D. Encoding and the durability of episodic memory: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 25, 7260–7267 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
66. Eldridge, L. L., Engel, S. A., Zeineh, M. M., Bookheimer, S. Y. & Knowlton, B. J. A dissociation of encoding and retrieval processes in the human hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 25, 3280–3286 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
67. Vilberg, K. L. & Rugg, M. D. Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information. Neuropsychologia 45, 2216–2225 (2007).
    Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
68. Sperling, R. et al. Putting names to faces: successful encoding of associative memories activates the anterior hippocampal formation. Neuroimage 20, 1400–1410 (2003). This study of associative learning provides fMRI evidence that strong, recollection-based memories produce detectable hippocampal activity whereas weak, recollection-based memories do not. In this study, the strength of the memory, not recollection or familiarity, determined whether hippocampal activity was detected.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
69. Rutishauser, U., Mamelak, A. N. & Schuman, E. N. Single-trial learning of novel stimuli by individual neurons of the human hippocampus–amygdala complex. Neuron 49, 805–813 (2006). This paper provides single-unit evidence of a familiarity signal in the human hippocampus during recognition memory performance.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
70. Viskontas, I. V., Knowlton, B. J., Steinmetz, P. N. & Fried, I. Differences in mnemonic processing by neurons in the human hippocampus and parahippocampal regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1654–1662 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
71. Suzuki, W. A. & Eichenbaum, H. The neurophysiology of memory. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 911, 175–191 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
72. Wilson, F. A. W., Brown, M. W. & Riches, I. P. in Cellular Mechanisms of Conditioning and Behavioral Plasticity (eds Woody, C. D., Alkon, D. L. & McGaugh, J. L.) 313–328 (Plenum, New York, 1988).
    Book Google Scholar
73. Otto, T. & Eichenbaum, H. Neuronal activity in the hippocampus during delayed nonmatching to sample performance in rats: evidence for hippocampal processing in recognition memory. Hippocampus 2, 323–334 (1992).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
74. Wood, E. R., Dudchenko, P. A. & Eichenbaum, H. The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature 397, 613–616 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
75. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. Science 254, 1377–1379 (1991).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
76. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J. Neurosci. 13, 1460–1478 (1993).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
77. Xiang, J. Z. & Brown, M. W. Differential neuronal encoding of novelty, familiarity and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropharmacology 37, 657–676 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
78. Gonsalves, B. D., Kahn, I., Curran, T., Norman, K. A. & Wagner, A. D. Memory strength and repetition suppression: multimodal imaging of medial temporal cortical contributions to recognition. Neuron 47, 751–761 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
79. Henson, R. N., Cansino, S., Herron, J. E., Robb, W. G. & Rugg, M. D. A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex? Hippocampus 13, 301–304 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
80. Henson, R. N., Hornberger, M. & Rugg, M. D. Further dissociating the processes in recognition memory: an fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1058–1073 (2005).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
81. Fernández, G. & Tendolkar, I. The rhinal cortex: 'gatekeeper' of the declarative memory system. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 358–362 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
82. Law, J. R. et al. fMRI activity during the gradual acquisition and expression of paired-associate memory. J. Neurosci. 25, 5720–5729 (2005). This study demonstrates activity in the perirhinal cortex and other medial temporal lobe structures during a recollection-based task of associative learning.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
83. Kirwan, C. B. & Stark, C. E. L. Medial temporal lobe activation during encoding and retrieval of novel face–name pairs. Hippocampus 14, 919–930 (2004).
    Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
84. Düzel, E. et al. Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. J. Neurosci. 23, 9439–9444 (2003).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
85. Jackson, O. & Schacter, D. L. Encoding activity in anterior medial temporal lobe supports subsequent associative recognition. Neuroimage 21, 456–462 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
86. Staresina, B. P. & Davachi, L. Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. J. Neurosci. 26, 9162–9172 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
87. Tendolkar, I. et al. Probing the neural correlates of associative memory formation: a parametrically analyzed event-related functional MRI study. Brain Res. 1142, 159–168 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
88. Kohler, S., Danckert, S., Gati, J. S. & Ravi, R. S. Novelty responses to relational and non-relational information in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal region: a comparison based on event-related fMRI. Hippocampus 15, 763–774 (2005).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
89. Naya, Y., Yoshida, M. & Miyashita, Y. Forward processing of long-term associative memory in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J. Neurosci. 23, 2861–2871 (2003). This study provides single-unit evidence from monkeys of associative learning signals in the perirhinal cortex.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
90. Messinger, A., Squire, L. R., Zola, S. M. & Albright, T. D. Neuronal representations of stimulus associations develop in the temporal lobe during learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12239–12244 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
91. Yanike, M., Smith, A. C., Brown, E. N. & Suzuki, W. A. Changes in the selectivity of learning-related cells in perirhinal cortex during location-scene task in primates. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 574.22 (2006).
92. Murray, E. A., Baxter, M. G. & Gaffan, D. Monkeys with rhinal cortex damage or neurotoxic hippocampal lesions are impaired on spatial scene learning and object reversals. Behav. Neurosci. 112, 1291–1303 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
93. Murray, E. A., Gaffan, D. & Mishkin, M. Neural substrates of visual stimulus–stimulus association in rhesus monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13, 4549–4561 (1993).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
94. Suzuki, W. A. in Hippocampal Place Fields: Relevance to Learning and Memory (ed. Mizumori, S.) (Oxford Univ. Press) (in the press).
95. Underwood, B. Attributes of memory. Psychol. Rev. 76, 559–573 (1969).
    Article Google Scholar
96. Eichenbaum, H., Dudchenko, P., Wood, E., Shapiro, M. & Tanila, H. The hippocampus, memory, and place cells: is it spatial memory or a memory space? Neuron 23, 209–226 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
97. Squire, L. R., Zola-Morgan, S. & Chen, K. Human amnesia and animal models of amnesia: performance of amnesic patients on tests designed for the monkey. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 210–221 (1988).
    Article Google Scholar
98. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Rempel, N. L., Clower, R. P. & Amaral, D. G. Enduring memory impairment in monkeys after ischemic damage to the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 9, 4355–4370 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
99. Alvarez, P., Zola-Morgan, S. & Squire, L. R. Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 15, 3796–3807 (1995).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
100. Beason-Held, L. L., Rosene, D. L., Killiany, R. J. & Moss, M. B. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 9, 562–574 (1999).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
101. Zola, S. M. et al. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. J. Neurosci. 20, 451–463 (2000).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
102. Nemanic, S., Alvarado, M. C. & Bachevalier, J. The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: insights from visual paired comparison versus object delayed nonmatching in monkeys. J. Neurosci. 24, 2013–2026 (2004).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
103. Murray, E. A. & Mishkin, M. Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 18, 6568–6582 (1998).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
104. Mumby, D. G., Wood, E. R. & Pinel, J. P. J. Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala. Psychobiology 20, 18–27 (1992).
     Article Google Scholar
105. Mumby, D. G., Pinel, J. P. J., Kornecook, T. J., Shen, M. J. & Redila, V. A. Memory deficits following lesions of hippocampus or amygdala in rat: assessment by an object-memory test battery. Psychobiology 23, 26–36 (1995).
     Article Google Scholar
106. Clark, R. E., West, A. N., Zola, S. M. & Squire, L. R. Rats with lesions of the hippocampus are impaired on the delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Hippocampus 11, 176–186 (2001).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
107. Prusky, G. T., Douglas, R. M., Nelson, L., Shabanpoor, A. & Sutherland, R. J. Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5064–5068 (2004).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
108. Mumby, D. G. et al. Ischemia-induced object-recognition deficits in rats are attenuated by hippocampal ablation before or soon after ischemia. Behav. Neurosci. 110, 266–281 (1996).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
109. Duva, C. A. et al. Disruption of spatial but not object-recognition memory by neurotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 111, 1184–1196 (1997).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
110. McKee, R. D. & Squire, L. R. On the development of declarative memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 19, 397–404 (1993).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
111. Pascalis, O., Hunkin, N. M., Holdstock, J. S., Isaac, C. L. & Mayes, A. R. Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition. Neuropsychologia 42, 1293–1300 (2004).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
112. Clark, R. E., Zola, S. M. & Squire, L. R. Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 20, 8853–8860 (2000).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
113. Rampon, C. et al. Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1-knockout mice. Nature Neurosci. 3, 238–244 (2000).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
114. Gould, T. J. et al. Effects of hippocampal lesions on patterned motor learning in the rat. Brain Res. Bull. 58, 581–586 (2002).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
115. Baker, K. B. & Kim, J. J. Effects of stress and hippocampal NMDA receptor antagonism on recognition memory in rats. Learn. Mem. 9, 58–65 (2002).
     Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
116. Gaskin, S., Tremblay, A. & Mumby, D. G. Retrograde and anterograde object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Hippocampus 13, 962–969 (2003).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
117. Hammond, R. S., Tull, L. E. & Stackman, R. W. On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 26–34 (2004).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
118. Broadbent, N. J., Squire, L. R. & Clark, R. E. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14515–14520 (2004).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
119. de Lima, M. N., Luft, T., Roesler, R. & Schroder, N. Temporary inactivation reveals an essential role of the dorsal hippocampus in consolidation of object recognition memory. Neurosci. Lett. 405, 142–146 (2006).
     Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
120. Ainge, J. A. et al. The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size. Behav. Brain Res. 167, 183–195 (2006).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
121. Rossato, J. I. et al. On the role of hippocampal protein synthesis in the consolidation and reconsolidation of object recognition memory. Learn. Mem. 14, 36–46 (2007).
     Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
122. Winters, B. D., Forwood, S. E., Cowell, R. A., Saksida, L. M. & Bussey, T. J. Double dissociation between the effects of peri-postrhinal cortex and hippocampal lesions on tests of object recognition and spatial memory: heterogeneity of function within the temporal lobe. J. Neurosci. 24, 5901–5908 (2004).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
123. Forwood, S. E., Winters, B. D. & Bussey, T. J. Hippocampal lesions that abolish spatial maze performance spare object recognition memory at delays of up to 48 hours. Hippocampus 15, 347–355 (2005).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
124. Mumby, D. G., Tremblay, A., Lecluse, V. & Lehmann, H. Hippocampal damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals. Hippocampus 15, 1050–1056 (2005).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
125. O'Brien, N., Lehmann, H., Lecluse, V. & Mumby, D. G. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions. Behav. Brain Res. 170, 156–162 (2006).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
126. Logothetis, N. K. & Wandell, B. A. Interpreting the BOLD signal. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 66, 735–769 (2004). This paper reviews the relationship between neural activity and the fMRI BOLD signal. A key conclusion is that the BOLD response can depend nonlinearly on the neural signal and that this nonlinearity can differ across brain regions.
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
127. Heeger, D. J. & Ress, D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 3, 142–151 (2002).
     Article CAS Google Scholar
128. Macmillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide (2nd ed.) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005).
     Google Scholar
129. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F. & Gronlund, S. D. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol. Rev. 99, 518–535 (1992).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references