Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo (original) (raw)

• Kornberg, R.D. Structure of chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46, 931–954 (1977).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yuan, G.-C. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626–630 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lee, W. et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat. Genet. 39, 1235–1244 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mavrich, T.N. et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453, 358–362 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schones, D.E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shivaswamy, S. et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Valouev, A. et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 18, 1051–1063 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mavrich, T.N. et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosome throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18, 1073–1083 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Deckert, J. & Struhl, K. Histone acetylation at promoters is differentially affected by activators and repressors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2726–2735 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Boeger, H. et al. Nucleosomes unfold completely at a transcriptionally active promoter. Mol. Cell 11, 1587–1598 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Reinke, H. & Horz, W. Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell 11, 1599–1607 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schwabish, M.A. & Struhl, K. The Swi/Snf complex is important for histone eviction during transcriptional activation and RNA polymerase II elongation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 6987–6995 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kristjuhan, A. & Svejstrup, J.Q. Evidence for distinct mechanisms facilitating transcript elongation through chromatin in vivo. EMBO J. 23, 4243–4252 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lee, C.K. et al. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nat. Genet. 36, 900–905 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schwabish, M.A. & Struhl, K. Evidence for eviction and rapid deposition of histones upon transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10111–10117 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kaplan, N. et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458, 362–366 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sekinger, E.A., Moqtaderi, Z. & Struhl, K. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. Mol. Cell 18, 735–748 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Iyer, V. & Struhl, K. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic structure. EMBO J. 14, 2570–2579 (1995).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Drew, H.R. & Travers, A.A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 186, 773–790 (1985).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Satchwell, S.C., Drew, H.R. & Travers, A.A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 191, 659–675 (1986).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Widom, J. Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics. Q. Rev. Biophys. 34, 269–324 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fedor, M.J., Lue, N.F. & Kornberg, R.D. Statistical positioning of nucleosomes by specific protein binding to an upstream activating sequence in yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 204, 109–127 (1988).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lowary, P.T. & Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772–778 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, I. & Tsukiyama, T. Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 633–640 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, A. et al. Relationships between p63 binding, DNA sequence, transcription activity, and biological function in human cells. Mol. Cell 24, 593–602 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liu, X. et al. Whole-genome comparison of Leu3 binding in vitro and in vivo reveals the importance of nucleosome occupancy in target site selection. Genome Res. 16, 1517–1528 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hörz, W. & Altenburger, W. Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 2643–2658 (1981).
  Article Google Scholar
• Struhl, K. Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 651–674 (1995).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Muse, G.W. et al. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 1507–1511 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, E.J. et al. Genome-wide distribution of yeast RNA polymerase II and its control by Sen1 helicase. Mol. Cell 24, 735–746 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Struhl, K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 103–105 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dion, M.F. et al. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315, 1405–1408 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fyodorov, D.V. & Kadonaga, J.T. Chromatin assembly in vitro with purified recombinant ACF and NAP-1. Methods Enzymol. 371, 499–515 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar