Lower land-use emissions responsible for increased net land carbon sink during the slow warming period (original) (raw)

References

  1. Easterling, D. R. & Wehner, M. F. Is the climate warming or cooling? Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L08706 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Kaufmann, R. K., Kauppi, H., Mann, M. L. & Stock, J. H. Reconciling anthropogenic climate change with observed temperature 1998-2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11790–11793 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. L., Furtado, J. C., Barlow, M. & Alexeev, V. A. Asymmetric seasonal temperature trends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04705 (2012).
    Google Scholar
  4. Smith, W. K. et al. Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 306–310 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Zhao, M. & Running, S. W. Drought-induced reduction in global terrestrial net primary production from 2000 through 2009. Science 329, 940–943 (2010).
  6. Jong, R., Verbesselt, J., Schaepman, M. E. & Bruin, S. Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short-term trends to longer-term change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 642–655 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Mohammat, A. et al. Drought and spring cooling induced recent decrease in vegetation growth in InnerAsia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 178, 21–30 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Kong, D., Zhang, Q., Singh, V. P. & Shi, P. Seasonal vegetation response to climate change in the Northern Hemisphere (1982–2013). Glob. Planet. Change 148, 1–8 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Keenan, T. F. et al. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nat. Commun. 7, 13428 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Ballantyne, A. et al. Accelerating net terrestrial carbon uptake during the warming hiatus due to reduced respiration. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 148–152 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Zhu, Z. et al. The accelerating land carbon uptake of the 2000s may not be driven predominantly by the warming hiatus. Geophys Res Lett. 45, 1402–1409 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Houghton, R. A. & Nassikas, A. A. Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850-2015. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 456–472 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2013. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 6, 235–263 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Houghton, R. A. et al. Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences 9, 5125–5142 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2015. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 349–396 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Hartmann, D. L. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.)192–194 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).
  17. Ballantyne, A. et al. Accelerating net terrestrial carbon uptake during the warming hiatus due to reduced respiration. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 148–152 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Grassi, G. et al. The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 220–226 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. De Kauwe, M. G. et al. Satellite based estimates underestimate the effect of CO2 fertilization on net primary productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 892–893 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T. & van der Werf, G. R. Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth-generation global fire emissions database (GFED4). J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 317–328 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Andela, N. et al. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 1356–1362 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Rudel, T. K. et al. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob. Environ. Change 15, 23–31 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Sánchezcuervo, A. M., Aide, T. M., Clark, M. L. & Etter, A. Land cover change in Colombia: surprising forest recovery trends between 2001 and 2010. PLoS ONE 7 e43943 (2012)..
  25. Magliocca, N. R. et al. Synthesis in land change science: methodological patterns, challenges, and guidelines. Reg. Environ. Change 15, 211–226 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Chazdon, R. L. et al. Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501639 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How are the world’s forests changing? (FAO, 2015); http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/en/
  29. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2014. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 7, 47–85 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Hansis, E., Davis, S. J. & Pongratz, J. Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1230–1246 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500-2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Change 109, 117–161 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Erb, K. H. et al. Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 854–856 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Poeplau, C. et al. Temporal dynamics of soil organic carbon after land-use change in the temperate zone—carbon response functions as a model approach. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2415–2427 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Tucker, C. J. et al. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4485–4498 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Keeling, R. F., Piper, S. C., Bollenbacher, A. F. & Walker, J. S. in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, 2009); https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/atg.035
  36. Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Van Drecht, G. & De Vos, Martine The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 73–86 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Goldewijk, K. A historical land use data set for the Holocene; HYDE 3.2. EGU General. Assem. Conf. Abstr. 18, 1574 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  38. Peylin, P. et al. Global atmospheric carbon budget: results from an ensemble of atmospheric CO2 inversions. Biogeosciences 10, 6699–6720 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Chevallier, F. et al. CO2 surface fluxes at grid point scale estimated from a global 21 year reanalysis of atmospheric measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D21307 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Rӧdenbeck, C. Estimating CO 2 Sources and Sinks from Atmospheric Mixing Ratio Measurements using a Global Inversion of Atmospheric Transport Tech. Rep. 6 (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, 2005); http://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/uploads/Publications/TechnicalReports/tech_report6.pdf
  41. Thompson, R. L. et al. Top–down assessment of the Asian carbon budget since the mid 1990s. Nat. Commun. 7, 10724 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2016. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 8, 605 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Houghton, R. A. et al. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol. Monogr. 53, 235–262 (1983).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Houghton, R. A. Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus B 55, 378–390 (2003).
    Google Scholar
  45. Wolf, J. et al. Biogenic carbon fluxes from global agricultural production and consumption. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1617–1639 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Kyle, P. et al. GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and Land Use: Data Sources and Methods PNNL-21025 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2011); https://doi.org/10.2172/1036082
  47. Ciais, P. et al. The impact of lateral carbon fluxes on the European carbon balance. Biogeosci. Discuss. 3, 1529–1559 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Laruelle, G. G. et al. Global multi-scale segmentation of continental and coastal waters from the watersheds to the continental margins. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2029 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Regnier, P. et al. Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nat. Geosci. 6, 597–607 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Houghton, R. & House, J. Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 177 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Manly, B. F. J. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006).

Download references