High-performance solar flow battery powered by a perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell (original) (raw)
References
Eke, K. P. Emerging considerations of rural electrification infrastructure development in Africa. In 2017 IEEE PES Power Africa Conference 138–142 (IEEE, 2017).
Cook, P. Infrastructure, rural electrification and development. Energy Sustain. Dev.15, 304–313 (2011). Google Scholar
Wamukonya, N. Solar home system electrification as a viable technology option for Africa’s development. Energy Policy35, 6–14 (2007). Google Scholar
Halder, P. K. Potential and economic feasibility of solar home systems implementation in Bangladesh. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.65, 568–576 (2016). Google Scholar
Charles, R. G., Davies, M. L., Douglas, P., Hallin, I. L. & Mabbett, I. Sustainable energy storage for solar home systems in rural Sub-Saharan Africa—a comparative examination of lifecycle aspects of battery technologies for circular economy, with emphasis on the South African context. Energy166, 1207–1215 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Gurung, A. & Qiao, Q. Q. Solar charging batteries: advances, challenges, and opportunities. Joule2, 1217–1230 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Schmidt, D., Hager, M. D. & Schubert, U. S. Photo-rechargeable electric energy storage systems. Adv. Energy Mater.6, 1500369 (2015). Google Scholar
Yu, M. et al. Solar-powered electrochemical energy storage: an alternative to solar fuels. J. Mater. Chem. A4, 2766–2782 (2016). CAS Google Scholar
Wedege, K., Bae, D., Smith, W. A., Mendes, A. & Bentien, A. Solar redox flow batteries with organic redox couples in aqueous electrolytes: a minireview. J. Phys. Chem. C122, 25729–25740 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Wedege, K. et al. Unbiased, complete solar charging of a neutral flow battery by a single Si photocathode. RSC Adv.8, 6331–6340 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Li, W., Fu, H.-C., Zhao, Y., He, J.-H. & Jin, S. 14.1% efficient monolithically integrated solar flow battery. Chem4, 2644–2657 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Li, W. J. et al. A long lifetime aqueous organic solar flow battery. Adv. Energy Mater.9, 1900918 (2019). Google Scholar
Yu, M. Z. et al. Aqueous lithium-iodine solar flow battery for the simultaneous conversion and storage of solar energy. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 8332–8335 (2015). CAS Google Scholar
Liao, S. et al. Integrating a dual-silicon photoelectrochemical cell into a redox flow battery for unassisted photocharging. Nat. Commun.7, 11474–11478 (2016). CAS Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Integrated photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion and organic redox flow battery devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 13104–13108 (2016). CAS Google Scholar
Wedege, K., Azevedo, J., Khataee, A., Bentien, A. & Mendes, A. Direct solar charging of an organic-inorganic, stable, and aqueous alkaline redox flow battery with a hematite photoanode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 7142–7147 (2016). CAS Google Scholar
Cheng, Q. et al. Photorechargeable high voltage redox battery enabled by Ta3N5 and GaN/Si dual-photoelectrode. Adv. Mater.351, 1700312–1700318 (2017). Google Scholar
McKone, J. R., DiSalvo, F. J. & Abruna, H. D. Solar energy conversion, storage, and release using an integrated solar-driven redox flow battery. J. Mater. Chem. A5, 5362–5372 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. et al. Efficient solar energy harvesting and storage through a robust photocatalyst driving reversible redox reactions. Adv. Mater.103, 1802294–1802297 (2018). Google Scholar
Hu, S. et al. Amorphous TiO2 coatings stabilize Si, GaAs, and GaP photoanodes for efficient water oxidation. Science344, 1005–1009 (2014). CAS Google Scholar
Khan, M. A. et al. Importance of oxygen measurements during photoelectrochemical water-splitting reactions. ACS Energy Lett.4, 2712–2718 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Liu, T., Wei, X., Nie, Z., Sprenkle, V. & Wang, W. A total organic aqueous redox flow battery employing a low cost and sustainable methyl viologen anolyte and 4-HO-TEMPO catholyte. Adv. Energy Mater.6, 1501449 (2015). Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. A long lifetime all-organic aqueous flow battery utilizing TMAP-TEMPO radical. Chem5, 1861–1870 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Hu, S. et al. Thin-film materials for the protection of semiconducting photoelectrodes in solar-fuel generators. J. Phys. Chem. C119, 24201–24228 (2015). CAS Google Scholar
Bae, D., Seger, B., Vesborg, P. C. K., Hansen, O. & Chorkendorff, I. Strategies for stable water splitting via protected photoelectrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 1933–1954 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Beh, E. S. et al. A neutral pH aqueous organic-organometallic redox flow battery with extremely high capacity retention. ACS Energy Lett.2, 639–644 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 54). Prog. Photovolt.27, 565–575 (2019). Google Scholar
Seger, B. et al. Using TiO2 as a conductive protective layer for photocathodic H2 evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 1057–1064 (2013). CAS Google Scholar
Shaner, M. R., Hu, S., Sun, K. & Lewis, N. S. Stabilization of Si microwire arrays for solar-driven H2O oxidation to O2(g) in 1.0 M KOH(aq) using conformal coatings of amorphous TiO2. Energy Environ. Sci.8, 203–207 (2015). CAS Google Scholar
Zheng, J. H. et al. Large area efficient interface layer free monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell with over 20% efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci.11, 2432–2443 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Zheng, J. H. et al. 21.8% efficient monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell on 16 cm(2). ACS Energy Lett.3, 2299–2300 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Bush, K. A. et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy2, 17009 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Correa-Baena, J. P. et al. Promises and challenges of perovskite solar cells. Science358, 739–744 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Yu, Z. S., Leilaeioun, M. & Holman, Z. Selecting tandem partners for silicon solar cells. Nat. Energy1, 16137 (2016). Google Scholar
Ji, Y. et al. A phosphonate-functionalized quinone redox flow battery at near-neutral pH with record capacity retention rate. Adv. Energy Mater.9, 1900039 (2019). Google Scholar
DeBruler, C. et al. Designer two-electron storage viologen anolyte materials for neutral aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Chem3, 961–978 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Park, M., Ryu, J., Wang, W. & Cho, J. Material design and engineering of next-generation flow-battery technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater2, 16080–16018 (2016). Google Scholar
Hollas, A. et al. A biomimetic high-capacity phenazine-based anolyte for aqueous organic redox flow batteries. Nat. Energy3, 508–514 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Luo, J. A., Hu, B., Hu, M. W., Zhao, Y. & Liu, T. L. Status and prospects of organic redox flow batteries toward sustainable energy storage. ACS Energy Lett.4, 2220–2240 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Weber, A. Z. et al. Redox flow batteries: a review. J. Appl. Electrochem.41, 1137–1164 (2011). CAS Google Scholar
Darling, R. M., Gallagher, K. G., Kowalski, J. A., Ha, S. & Brushett, F. R. Pathways to low-cost electrochemical energy storage: a comparison of aqueous and nonaqueous flow batteries. Energy Environ. Sci.7, 3459–3477 (2014). CAS Google Scholar
Hu, B., DeBruler, C., Rhodes, Z. & Liu, T. L. Long-cycling aqueous organic redox flow battery (AORFB) toward sustainable and safe energy storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 1207–1214 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Goulet, M. A. & Aziz, M. J. Flow battery molecular reactant stability determined by symmetric cell cycling methods. J. Electrochem. Soc.165, A1466–A1477 (2018). CAS Google Scholar