Methods for phylogenetic analysis of microbiome data (original) (raw)

• Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T. & Martiny, A. C. Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective. Science 350, aac9323 (2015).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1982).
  Google Scholar
• MacArthur, R. H. Environmental factors affecting bird species diversity. Am. Nat. 98, 387–397 (1964).
  Article Google Scholar
• May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001).
  Google Scholar
• Arditi, R. & Ginzburg, L. R. How Species Interact: Altering the Standard View on Trophic Ecology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
  Book Google Scholar
• Consortium, H. M. P. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T. & Delong, E. F. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320, 1034–1039 (2008).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Bardgett, R. D., Freeman, C. & Ostle, N. J. Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J. 2, 805–814 (2008).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Nei, M. & Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2000).
  Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. & Rannala, B. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 303 (2012).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hillis, D. M. & Dixon, M. T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66, 411–453 (1991).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Snel, B., Bork, P. & Huynen, M. A. Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nat. Genet. 21, 108–110 (1999).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Zaneveld, J. R., Lozupone, C., Gordon, J. I. & Knight, R. Ribosomal RNA diversity predicts genome diversity in gut bacteria and their relatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3869–3879 (2010).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Hall, B. G. & Barlow, M. Evolution of the serine β-lactamases: past, present and future. Drug Resist. Updat. 7, 111–123 (2004).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F. & Lawrence, J. G. Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2226–2238 (2002).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Větrovský, T. & Baldrian, P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS ONE 8, e57923 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Kelley, S. T. & Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1576–1585 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Stone, E. A. Why the phylogenetic regression appears robust to tree misspecification. Syst. Biol. 60, 245–260 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Riesenfeld, S. J. & Pollard, K. S. Beyond classification: gene-family phylogenies from shotgun metagenomic reads enable accurate community analysis. BMC Genomics 14, 419 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grafen, A. The phylogenetic regression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 326, 119–157 (1989).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Martins, E. P. & Hansen, T. F. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646–667 (1997).
  Article Google Scholar
• Blomberg, S. P., Lefevre, J. G., Wells, J. A. & Waterhouse, M. Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent. Syst. Biol. 61, 382–391 (2012).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr, Ives, A. R. & Crespi, B. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lavin, S. R., Karasov, W. H., Ives, A. R., Middleton, K. M., & Garland, T.Jr. Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 81, 526–550 (2008).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lindenfors, P., Revell, L. J. & Nunn, C. L. Sexual dimorphism in primate aerobic capacity: a phylogenetic test. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1183–1194 (2010).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Garamszegi, L. Z. Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (Springer, London, 2014).
• Bradley, P. H., Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. Phylogeny-corrected identification of microbial gene families relevant to human gut colonization. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/16/189795 (2017).
• Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Orme, D. The Caper Package: Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R. R Package v.5 (CRAN, 2013).
• Harmon, L. J., Weir, J. T., Brock, C. D., Glor, R. E. & Challenger, W. GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24, 129–131 (2007).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Tung Ho, Ls & Ané, C. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst. Biol. 63, 397–408 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Langille, M. G. I. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. W., Omland, K. E. & Oakley, T. H. Reconstructing ancestral character states: a critical reappraisal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 361–366 (1998).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Joy, J. B., Liang, R. H., McCloskey, R. M., Nguyen, T. & Poon, A. F. Y. Ancestral reconstruction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004763 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Kuhner, M. K. & Felsenstein, J. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 459–468 (1994).
  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Joy, J. B., Liang, R. H., Mccloskey, R. M., Nguyen, T. & Art, F. Ancestral reconstruction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 112, e1004763 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Washburne, A. D. et al. Phylogenetic factorization of compositional data yields lineage-level associations in microbiome datasets. PeerJ 5, e2969 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S. & David, L. A. A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. eLife 6, e21887 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Socolar, J. & Washburne, A. Prey carrying capacity modulates the effect of predation on prey diversity. Am. Nat. 186, 333–347 (2015).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• McCann, K. S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405, 228 (2000).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Socolar, J. B., Gilroy, J. J., Kunin, W. E. & Edwards, D. P. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 67–80 (2016).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Aitchison, J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Chapman and Hall, London, 1986).
  Book Google Scholar
• Gloor, G. B. & Reid, G. Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high-throughput sequencing data. Can. J. Microbiol. 62, 692–703 (2016).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Klappenbach, J. A., Dunbar, J. M. & Schmidt, T. M. rRNA operon copy number reflects ecological strategies of bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1328–1333 (2000).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8228–8235 (2005).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Chang, Q., Luan, Y. & Sun, F. Variance adjusted weighted UniFrac: a powerful beta diversity measure for comparing communities based on phylogeny. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 118 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, J. et al. Associating microbiome composition with environmental covariates using generalized UniFrac distances. 28, 2106–2113 (2012).
• Swenson, N. G. Phylogenetic beta diversity metrics, trait evolution and inferring the functional beta diversity of communities. PLoS ONE 6, e21264 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Bushman, F. D., Lewis, J. D., Wu, G. D. & Li, H. Structure-constrained sparse canonical correlation analysis with an application to microbiome data analysis. Biostatistics 14, 244–258 (2013).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Purdom, E. Analysis of a data matrix and a graph: metagenomic data and the phylogenetic tree. Ann. Appl. Stat. 5, 2326–2358 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, J. et al. Multidomain analyses of a longitudinal human microbiome intestinal cleanout perturbation experiment. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005706 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Hamady, M., Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 4, 17 (2010).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gogarten, J. P. & Townsend, J. P. Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 679 (2005).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Cohen, O., Gophna, U. & Pupko, T. The complexity hypothesis revisited: connectivity rather than function constitutes a barrier to horizontal gene transfer research article. 28, 1481–1489 (2011).
• Kitahara, K. & Miyazaki, K. Natural and experimental evidence for horizontal gene transfer of 16S rRNA revisiting bacterial phylogeny. 3, e24210 (2013).
• Segata, N., Börnigen, D., Morgan, X. C. & Huttenhower, C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2304 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Than, C., Ruths, D. & Nakhleh, L. PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 322 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Ravenhall, M., Škunca, N., Lassalle, F. & Dessimoz, C. Inferring horizontal gene transfer. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004095 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Lozupone, C. A. & Knight, R. Species divergence and the measurement of microbial diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 557–578 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Sant’Ana, C. E. R. & Bini, L. M. An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52, 1247–1262 (1998).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Gloor, G. B. & Reid, G. Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high throughput sequencing data. Can. J. Microbiol. 62, 692–703 (2016).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Freckleton, R. P., Cooper, N. & Jetz, W. Comparative methods as a statistical fix: the dangers of ignoring an evolutionary model. Am. Nat. 178, E10–E17 (2011).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Heath, T. A., Hedtke, S. M. & Hillis, D. M. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 46, 239–257 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5970–5975 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Hipsley, C. A. & Müller, J. Beyond fossil calibrations: realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. Front. Genet. 5, 138 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Forest, F. Calibrating the tree of life: fossils, molecules and evolutionary timescales. Ann. Bot. 104, 789–794 (2009).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 367–372 (1996).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, A. & Eyre-Walker, A. Variation in the mutation rate across mammalian genomes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 756 (2011).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar