Best practices for analysing microbiomes (original) (raw)

• Meisel, J. S., Hannigan, G. D. & Tyldsley, A. S. Skin microbiome surveys are strongly influenced by experimental design. J. Invest. Dermatol. 136, 947–956 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 29, 560–564 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Noguera-Julian, M. et al. Gut microbiota linked to sexual preference and HIV infection. EBioMedicine. 5, 135–146 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, Gary, D. et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science 334, 105–108 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Forslund, K. et al. Disentangling the effects of type 2 diabetes and metformin on the human gut microbiota. Nature 528, 262–266 (2015). This study is an excellent example of how study design and metadata collection can influence experimental results.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. A. et al. Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota. Gut 65, 749–756 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Halfvarson, J. Dynamics of the human gut microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17004 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kelly, B. J. et al. Power and sample-size estimation for microbiome studies using pairwise distances and PERMANOVA. Bioinformatics 31, 2461–2468 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Debelius, J., Song, S. J., Vazquez-Baeza, Y., Xu, Z. Z., Gonzalez, A. & Knight, R. Tiny microbes, enormous impacts: what matters in gut microbiome studies? Genome Biol. 17, 217 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• La Rosa, P. S. et al. Hypothesis testing and power calculations for taxonomic-based human microbiome data. PLoS ONE. 7, e52078 (2012).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knights, D., Costello, E. K. & Knight, R. Supervised classification of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 35, 343–359 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dethlefsen, L. & Relman, D. A. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4554–4561 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fierer, N., Hamady, M., Lauber, C. L. & Knight, R. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17994–17999 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Costello, E. K. et al. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326, 1694–1697 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012). This study was the first large-scale effort to characterize the healthy human microbiota and commonly used reference database.
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McDonald, D., Birmingham, A. & Knight, R. Context and the human microbiome. Microbiome 3, 52 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ramette, A. Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 142–160 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kostic, A. D., Howitt, M. R. & Garrett, W. S. Exploring host-microbiota interactions in animal models and humans. Genes Dev. 27, 701–718 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ridaura, V. K. et al. Cultured gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate adiposity and metabolic phenotypes in mice. Science 341, 6150 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• Reber, S. O. et al. Immunization with a heat-killed preparation of the environmental bacterium Mycobacterium Vaccae promotes stress resilience in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E3130–E3139 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ley, R. E. et al. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11070–11075 (2005).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Friswell, M. K. et al. Site and strain-specific variation in gut microbiota profiles and metabolism in experimental mice. PLoS ONE. 5, e8584 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Snijders, A. M. et al. Influence of early life exposure, host genetics and diet on the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16221 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stagaman, K., Burns, A. R., Guillemin, K. & Bohannan, B. J. The role of adaptive immunity as an ecological filter on the gut microbiota in zebrafish. ISME J. 11, 1630–1639 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sinha, R. et al. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1077–1086 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Costea, P. I. et al. Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1069–1076 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can. critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Amir, A. et al. Correcting for microbial blooms in fecal samples during room-temperature shipping. mSystems 2, e00199–00116 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fouhy, F. et al. The effects of freezing on faecal microbiota as determined using MiSeq sequencing and culture-based investigations. PLoS ONE. 10, e0119355 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Song, S. J. et al. Preservation methods differ in fecal microbiome stability, affecting suitability for field studies. mSystems 1, e00021–00016 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group. Evaluation of 16S rDNA-based community profiling for human microbiome research. PLoS ONE. 7, e39315 (2012).
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chase, J. et al. Geography and location are the primary drivers of office microbiome composition. mSystems 1, e00022–00016 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Walker, A. W. et al. 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the human infant gut microbiota is strongly influenced by sample processing and PCR primer choice. Microbiome 3, 26 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bonnet, R., Suau, A., Doré, J., Gibson, G. R. & Collins, M. D. Differences in rDNA libraries of faecal bacteria derived from 10- and 25-cycle PCRs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 757–763 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Walters, W. A. et al. PrimerProspector: de novo design and taxonomic analysis of barcoded polymerase chain reaction primers. Bioinformatics 27, 1159–1161 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zaneveld, J. R., Lozupone, C., Gordon, J. I. & Knight, R. Ribosomal RNA diversity predicts genome diversity in gut bacteria and their relatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3869–3879 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Okuda, S., Tsuchiya, Y., Kiriyama, C., Itoh, M. & Morisaki, H. Virtual metagenome reconstruction from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat. Commun. 3, 1203 (2012).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Langille, M. G. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jun, S. R., Robeson, M. S., Hauser, L. J., Schadt, C. W. & Gorin, A. A. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities. BMC Res. Notes 8, 479 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Scholz, M. et al. Strain-level microbial epidemiology and population genomics from shotgun metagenomics. Nat. Methods. 13, 435–438 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S. et al. 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 676–683 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Abubucker, Sahar et al. Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002358 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quince, C., Walker, A. W. & Simpson, J. T. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 833–844 (2017). This is a comprehensive review on using shotgun metagenomics.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carini, P. et al. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16242 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Emerson, J. B. et al. Schrödinger’s microbes: tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems. Microbiome 5, 86 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giannoukos, G. et al. Efficient and robust RNA-Seq process for cultured bacteria and complex community transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 13, 3 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Hayatsu, M. & Fujii, T. Extraction of bacterial RNA from soil: challenges and solutions. Microbes Environ. 27, 111–121 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tveit, A. T., Urich, T. & Svenning, M. M. Metatranscriptomic analysis of arctic peat soil microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 5761–5772 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Franzosa, E. A. et al. Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2329–E2338 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maurice, C. F., Haiser, H. J. & Turnbaugh, P. J. Xenobiotics shape the physiology and gene expression of the active human gut microbiome. Cell 152, 39–50 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bashiardes, S., Zilberman-Schapira, G. & Elinav, E. Use of metatranscriptomics in microbiome research. Bioinform. Biol. Insights. 10, 19–25 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Soergel, D. A. W., Dey, N., Knight, R. & Brenner, S. E. Selection of primers for optimal taxonomic classification of environmental 16S rRNA gene sequences. ISME J. 6, 1440–1444 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–453 (2017). This study develops and implements standardized protocols and new analytical methods that enabled a massive comparison of over 100 studies to characterize the microbial diversity on Earth.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Glenn, T. C. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 759–769 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kunin, V., Engelbrektson, A., Ochman, H. & Hugenholtz, P. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 118–123 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Reeder, J. & Knight, R. The ‘rare biosphere’: a reality check. Nat. Methods. 6, 636–637 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 7, 335–336 (2010). This is a widely used software package for microbiome analysis.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).This is a widely used software package for microbiome analysis.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 11, 2639–2643 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eren, A. M. et al. Oligotyping: differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1111–1119 (2013).
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Amir, A. et al. Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. mSystems. 2, e00191–e00116 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 13, 581–583 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lozupone, C. A. et al. “Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota”. Genome Res. 23, 1704–1714 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naïve bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. et al. An improved greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610–618 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kuczynski, J. et al. Microbial community resemblance methods differ in their ability to detect biologically relevant patterns. Nat. Methods. 7, 813–819 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Olm, M. R. et al. The source and evolutionary history of a microbial contaminant identified through soil metagenomic analysis. MBio. 8, e01969–16 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 4, 357–359 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Song, L., Breitwieser, F. P. & Salzberg, S. L. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 26, 1721–1729 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. B. R. et al. Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers. Genome Biol. 18, 182 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods. 12, 902–903 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N., Mirarab, S., Liu, B., Pop, M. & Warnow, T. TIPP: taxonomic identification and phylogenetic profiling. Bioinformatics 30, 3548–3555 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN community edition - interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol 12, e1004957 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–D745 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D279–D285 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Suzek, B. E., Wang, Y., Huang, H., McGarvey, P. B. & Wu, C. H. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 31, 926–932 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Markowitz, V. M. et al. IMG: The integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D115–D122 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Arndt, D. et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 1–6 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. K., Forsberg, K. J. & Dantas, G. Improved annotation of antibiotic resistance determinants reveals microbial resistomes cluster by ecology. ISME J. 9, 1–10 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Prestat, E. et al. FOAM (Functional Ontology Assignments for Metagenomes): a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) database with environmental focus. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e145 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 6237 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Xiao, L. et al. A catalog of the mouse gut metagenome. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1103–1108 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalog established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59–65 (2010). This study is the first large-scale effort to catalogue microbial genomes in the human gut using shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Medema, M. H. et al. AntiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W339–W346 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Howe, A. C. et al. Tackling soil diversity with the assembly of large, complex metagenomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4904–4909 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ye, Y. & Tang, H. Utilizing de Bruijn graph of metagenome assembly for metatranscriptome analysis. Bioinformatics 32, 1001–1008 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy, S. et al. IMP: a pipeline for reproducible reference-independent integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses. Genome Biol. 17, 260 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Vollmers, J., Wiegand, S. & Kaster, A. K. Comparing and evaluating metagenome assembly tools from a microbiologist’s perspective - not only size matters! PLoS ONE 12, e0169662 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 605–607 (2015).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods. 11, 1144–1146 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Laczny, C. C. et al. VizBin - an application for reference-independent visualization and human-augmented binning of metagenomic data. Microbiome 3, 1 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eren, A. M. et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3, e1319 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• White Iii, R. A. et al. ATLAS (Automatic Tool for Local Assembly Structures) -a comprehensive infrastructure for assembly, annotation, and genomic binning of metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2843v1 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Treangen, T. J. et al. MetAMOS: a modular and open source metagenomic assembly and analysis pipeline. Genome Biol. 14, R2 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sczyrba, A. et al. Critical assessment of metagenome interpretation–a benchmark of computational metagenomics software. Nat. Methods 14, 1063–1071 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Barwell, L. J., Isaac, N. J. B. & Kunin, W. E. Measuring ß-diversity with species abundance data. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 1112–1122 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hamady, M., Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 4, 17–27 (2010). This study underscores the power of incorporating phylogenetic information when comparing microbial communities.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg Sci. 14, 927–930 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. J. & Walsh, D. C. I. What null hypothesis are you testing? PERMANOVA, ANOSIM and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions. Ecol. Monogr. 83, 557–574 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. et al. Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics. Microbiome 5, 27 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Pirrung, M., Gonzalez, A. & Knight, R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. GigaScience 2, 16 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B. Stat. Methodol. 44, 139–177 (1987).
  Google Scholar
• Mandal, S. et al. Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 26, 27663 (2015).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Weiss, S. et al. Correlation detection strategies in microbial data sets vary widely in sensitivity and precision. ISME J. 10, 1–13 (2016).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Lovell, D., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J. J., Marguerat, S. & Bähler, J. Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004075 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kurtz, Z. D. et al. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004226 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwager, E., Mallick, H., Ventz, S. & Huttenhower, C. A. Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005852 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Washburne, A. D. et al. Phylogenetic factorization of compositional data yields lineage-level associations in microbiome datasets. PeerJ 5, e2969 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A. D., Mukherjee, S. & David, L. A. A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data. eLife 6, e21887 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Morton, J. T. et al. Balance trees reveal microbial niche differentiation. mSystems 2, e00162–00116 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vandeputte, D. et al. Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load. Nature 551, 507–511 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kleyer, H., Tecon, R. & Or, D. Resolving species level changes in a representative soil bacterial community using microfluidic quantitative. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2017 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knights, D., Parfrey, L. W., Zaneveld, J., Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. Human-associated microbial signatures: examining their predictive value. Cell Host Microbe. 10, 292–296 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M. et al. Using machine learning to identify major shifts in human gut microbiome protein family abundance in disease. IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2016.7840731 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Huang, S. et al. Predictive modeling of gingivitis severity and susceptibility via oral microbiota. ISME J. 8, 1768–1780 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Teng, F. et al. Prediction of early childhood caries via spatial-temporal variations of oral microbiota. Cell Host Microbe. 18, 296–306 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J. L. et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition. Science 351, 158–162 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Subramanian, S. et al. Persistent gut microbiota immaturity in malnourished Bangladeshi children. Nature 510, 417–421 (2014). This study demonstrates the power of machine learning with microbiome data by developing a microbiota maturity index.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knights, D. et al. Bayesian community-wide culture-independent microbial source tracking. Nat. Methods. 8, 761–763 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lax, S. et al. Longitudinal analysis of microbial interaction between humans and the indoor environment. Science 345, 1048–1052 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Roume, H. et al. A biomolecular isolation framework for eco-systems biology. ISME J. 7, 110–121 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nicholson, J. K. & Lindon, J. C. Systems biology: metabonomics. Nature 455, 1054–1056 (2008).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, R. & Seyedsayamdost, M. R. Hijacking exogenous signals to generate new secondary metabolites during symbiotic interactions. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1, 21 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• Huan, T. et al. Systems biology guided by XCMS online metabolomics addressing reproducibility in single- laboratory phenotyping experiments. Nat. Methods 14, 461–462 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hurley, J. R. & Cattell, R. B. The procrustes program: producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behav. Sci. 7, 258–262 (1962).
  Google Scholar
• Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209–220 (1967).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Doledec, S. & Chessel, D. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwater Biol. 31, 277–294 (1994).
  Google Scholar
• Boulesteix, A. & Strimmer, K. Partial least squares: a versatile tool for the analysis of high-dimensional genomic data. Brief. Bioinform. 8, 32–44 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Witten, D. M. & Tibshirani, R. J. Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomic data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 8, 1–27 (2009).
  Google Scholar
• Wilms, I. & Croux, C. Robust sparse canonical correlation analysis. BMC Syst. Biol. 10, 72 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, M. et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 828–837 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dhanasekaran, A. R., Pearson, J. L., Ganesan, B. & Weimer, B. C. Metabolome searcher: a high throughput tool for metabolite identification and metabolic pathway mapping directly from mass spectrometry and using genome restriction. BMC Bioinformatics. 16, 62 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Protsyuk, Ivan. et al. 3D molecular cartography using LC-MS combined with optimus and ‘ili software. Nat. Protoc. 13, 134–154 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McHardy, I. H. et al. Integrative analysis of the microbiome and metabolome of the human intestinal mucosal surface reveals exquisite inter-relationships. Microbiome 1, 17 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whiteson, K. L. et al. Breath gas metabolites and bacterial metagenomes from cystic fibrosis airways indicate active pH neutral 2,3-butanedione fermentation. ISME J. 8, 1247–1258 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Theriot, C. M. et al. Antibiotic-induced shifts in the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome increase susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection. Nat. Commun. 5, 3114 (2014). A great example of omics data integration (microbiome and metabolome data).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Erickson, A. R. et al. Integrated metagenomics/metaproteomics reveals human host-microbiota signatures of Crohn’s disease. PLoS ONE. 7, e49138 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hultman, J. et al. Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes. Nature 521, 208–212 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jagtap, P. D. et al. Metaproteomic analysis using the galaxy framework. Proteomics 15, 3553–3565 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. et al. MetaLab: an automated pipeline for metaproteomic data analysis. Microbiome 5, 157 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, P. et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specificaitons. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 415–420 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ríos-Covián, D. et al. Intestinal short chain fatty acids and their link with diet and human health. Front. Microbiol. 7, 185 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Balskus, E. P. Colibactin: understanding an elusive gut bacterial genotoxin. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 1534–1540 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. A. et al. Microbial, host and xenobiotic diversity in the cystic fibrosis sputum metabolome. ISME J. 95384, 1–16 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Fang, H., Huang, C., Zhao, H. & Deng, M. CCLasso: correlation inference for compositional data through lasso. Bioinformatics 31, 3172–3180 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lê Cao, K. A., González, I. & Déjean, S. IntegrOmics: an R package to unravel relationships between two omics datasets. Bioinformatics 25, 2855–2856 (2009).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wikoff, W. R. et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3698–3703 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Lozupone, C., Hamady, M., Bushman, F. D. & Knight, R. Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e120 (2007).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• The Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The integrative human microbiome project: dynamic analysis of microbiome-host omics profiles during periods of human health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 16, 276–289 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Korem, T. et al. Growth dynamics of gut microbiota in health and disease inferred from single metagenomic samples. Science 349, 1101–1106 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sangwan, N., Xia, F. & Gilbert, J. A. Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets. Microbiome 4, 8 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bikel, S. et al. Combining metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics to explore novel microbial interactions: towards a systems-level understanding of human microbiome. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 390–401 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sultan, M. et al. Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data. BMC Genomics. 15, 675 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Peano, C. et al. An efficient rRNA removal method for RNA sequencing in GC-rich bacteria. Microb. Inform. Exp. 3, 1 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar