The size of the land carbon sink in China (original) (raw)

arising from J. Wang et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2849-9 (2020)

A substantial part of China’s anthropogenic emissions has been offset by its land carbon sink, which represents an important element in achieving carbon neutrality by 20601. Using newly released atmospheric CO2 measurements and an atmospheric inversion model, Wang et al.2 estimated China’s land carbon sink to be 1.11 ± 0.38 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C yr−1; positive values indicate net ecosystem carbon uptake) on average for the years 2010–2016, which is at least twice the previous inversion estimates of between 0.18 and 0.51 Pg C yr−1 (refs. 3, 4) (Fig. 1. Here we show that the land carbon sink estimate by Wang et al.2 is overestimated, because it is ecologically implausible and not supported by bottom-up evidence from ground and satellite observations, and the biases of representing Shangri-La site observations in a coarse-resolution transport model could have led to the extremely large inverse estimate. Expanding the current observation network and reconciling top-down and bottom-up estimates are recommended for more robust estimates on China’s land carbon sink.

Data availability

Atmospheric CO2 mole fraction data used in the reference, S0 and S1 inversions were collected from the following databases of atmospheric measurements: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory archive (Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases, http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/); the World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/); the Réseau Atmosphérique de Mesure des Composés à Effet de Serre database (http://www.lsce.ipsl.fr/); the Integrated Carbon Observation System–Atmospheric Thematic Center (https://icos-atc.lsce.ipsl.fr/); the National Institute for Environmental Studies (http://db.cger.nies.go.jp). CO2 mole fraction data used in the S0 and S1 inversions from the Chinese sites were retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17632/w3bwmr6rfg.1. The reference CAMS inversion results are available from https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/cams-global-greenhouse-gas-inversion?tab=form. The results of the high-resolution WRF-Chem simulation for Fig. 2 are available from https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16746667.v1.

Code availability

The CAMS inversion system is available on request from F.C. WRF-Chem V3.9.1 is maintained centrally and made available by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Earth System Research Laboratories/Global Systems Division (https://ruc.noaa.gov/wrf/wrf-chem/).

References

  1. Mallapaty, S. How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century. Nature 586, 482–483 (2020).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  2. Wang, J. et al. Large Chinese land carbon sink estimated from atmospheric carbon dioxide data. Nature 586, 720–723 (2020).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  3. Jiang, F. et al. A comprehensive estimate of recent carbon sinks in China using both top-down and bottom-up approaches. Sci. Rep. 6, 22130 (2016).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  4. Piao, S. et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458, 1009–1013 (2009).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  5. Fang, J., Yu, G., Liu, L., Hu, S. & Chapin, F. S. Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4015–4020 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Ji, Y. et al. Variation of net primary productivity and its drivers in China’s forests during 2000–2018. For. Ecosyst. 7, 15 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A. & Vitousek, P. M. in Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology (eds Chapin, F. S. et al.) 183–228 (Springer, 2011).
  8. Prentice, I. C. et al. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 183–237 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).
  9. Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  10. Tian, H. et al. China’s terrestrial carbon balance: contributions from multiple global change factors. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB1007 (2011).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  11. Ciais, P. et al. Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa145 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Agustí-Panareda, A. et al. Modelling CO2 weather – why horizontal resolution matters. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 7347–7376 (2019).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  13. Wang, Y. et al. Estimation of observation errors for large-scale atmospheric inversion of CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 69, 1325723 (2017).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  14. Chevallier, F. _Validation Report for the Inverted CO_2 Fluxes, v18r1–version 1.0, https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/2019-01/CAMS73_2018SC1_D73.1.4.1-2017-v0_201812_v1_final.pdf (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), 2018).
  15. Canadell, J. et al. (eds) Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP) Biogeosciences https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/special_issue107.html (2012–2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0405), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Basic Science Center for Tibetan Plateau Earth System grant number 41988101 and grant number 42171096, 42001104 and 42101090) and the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes-2 of the Global Carbon Project. F.C. is financially supported by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service, implemented by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts on behalf of the European Commission. H.T. is financially supported by the US National Science Foundation (grant number 1903722). S.J. is supported by the R&D Program for Oceans and Polar Regions of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(NRF-2020M1A5A1110493). We thank J. Zhu for discussions on carbon accumulation in domestic wood products.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Yilong Wang
  2. Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Xuhui Wang, Kai Wang, Dan Zhu & Yue He
  3. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, LSCE-IPSL (CEA-CNRS-UVSQ), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Frédéric Chevallier & Jinghui Lian
  4. Suez Group, Tour CB21, Paris, France
    Jinghui Lian
  5. International Center for Climate and Global Change Research, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
    Hanqin Tian
  6. Biodiversity Research Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China
    Junsheng Li
  7. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
    Jianxiao Zhu
  8. Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
    Sujong Jeong
  9. Global Carbon Project, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
    Josep G. Canadell

Authors

  1. Yilong Wang
  2. Xuhui Wang
  3. Kai Wang
  4. Frédéric Chevallier
  5. Dan Zhu
  6. Jinghui Lian
  7. Yue He
  8. Hanqin Tian
  9. Junsheng Li
  10. Jianxiao Zhu
  11. Sujong Jeong
  12. Josep G. Canadell

Contributions

Y.W. and X.W. designed the study. Y.W., X.W. and D.Z. coordinated the author team. Y.W., X.W., K.W., F.C. and J. Lian performed the analysis. Y.W., X.W. and D.Z. led the writing of the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toXuhui Wang or Dan Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, K. et al. The size of the land carbon sink in China.Nature 603, E7–E9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04255-y

Download citation