Global assessment of water challenges under uncertainty in water scarcity projections (original) (raw)

References

  1. United Nations Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations General Assembly, New York, NY, 2015).
  2. Vanham, D. et al. Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: an evaluation of indicator 6.4.2 ‘Level of water stress’. Sci. Total Environ. 613–614, 218–232 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Wada, Y., Beek, L. P. Hv, Wanders, N. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Human water consumption intensifies hydrological drought worldwide. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034036 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 3785–3808 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Schewe, J. et al. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3245–3250 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Greve, P. & Seneviratne, S. I. Assessment of future changes in water availability and aridity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5493–5499 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Huang, J., Yu, H., Dai, A., Wei, Y. & Kang, L. Drylands face potential threat under 2 C global warming target. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 417–422 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Gudmundsson, L., Seneviratne, S. I. & Zhang, X. Anthropogenic climate change detected in European renewable freshwater resources. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 813–816 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Qureshi, M. E. & Whitten, S. M. Regional impact of climate variability and adaptation options in the southern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour. Econ. 5, 67–84 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Flörke, M., Schneider, C. & McDonald, R. I. Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth. Nat. Sustain. 1, 51–58 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Hanasaki, N. et al. A global water scarcity assessment under Shared Socio-economic Pathways – Part 1: Water use. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2375–2391 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Hanasaki, N. et al. A global water scarcity assessment under Shared Socio-economic Pathways – Part 2: Water availability and scarcity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2393–2413 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500323 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Wada, Y. et al. Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 175–222 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Hoekstra, A. Y. Water scarcity challenges to business. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 318–320 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Wada, Y., Gleeson, T. & Esnault, L. Wedge approach to water stress. Nat. Geosci. 7, 615–617 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Kahil, M. T., Dinar, A. & Albiac, J. Modeling water scarcity and droughts for policy adaptation to climate change in arid and semiarid regions. J. Hydrol. 522, 95–109 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Tortajada, C. Water management in Singapore. Int. J. Water Resour. D 22, 227–240 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Devineni, N., Perveen, S. & Lall, U. Assessing chronic and climate-induced water risk through spatially distributed cumulative deficit measures: a new picture of water sustainability in India. Water Resour. Res. 49, 2135–2145 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Winemiller, K. O. et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science 351, 128–129 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Läderach, P. et al. Climate Change adaptation of coffee production in space and time. Climatic Change 141, 47–62 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Hadarits, M. et al. The interplay between incremental, transitional, and transformational adaptation: a case study of Canadian agriculture. Reg. Environ. Change 17, 1515–1525 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. O'Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T. & Puma, M. J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543, 700–704 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H. & Kabat, P. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 5041–5059 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, K., Stouffer, R. & Meehl, G. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Perveen, S. & James, L. A. Multiscale effects on spatial variability metrics in global water resources data. Water Resour. Manage. 24, 1903–1924 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Perveen, S. & James, L. A. Scale invariance of water stress and scarcity indicators: facilitating cross-scale comparisons of water resources vulnerability. Appl. Geogr. 31, 321–328 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Raskin, P. & Gleick, P. H. Water Futures: Assessment of Long-range Patterns and Problems. Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World (Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, 1997).
  31. Alcamo, J. et al. Global estimates of water withdrawals and availability under current and future ‘businessas-usual’ conditions. Hydrol. Sci. J. 48, 339–348 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Liu, J. et al. Water scarcity assessments in the past, present, and future. Earths Future 5, 545–559 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1107 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Hoekstra, A. Y., Mekonnen, M. M., Chapagain, A. K., Mathews, R. E. & Richter, B. D. Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7, e32688 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Veldkamp, T. I. E. et al. Changing mechanism of global water scarcity events: Impacts of socioeconomic changes and inter-annual hydro-climatic variability. Global Environ. Change 32, 18–29 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Kates, R. W.., Travis, W. R. & Wilbanks, T. J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7156–7161 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  37. Hall, J. W. et al. Coping with the curse of freshwater variability. Science 346, 429–430 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  38. Kahil, M. T., Connor, J. D. & Albiac, J. Efficient water management policies for irrigation adaptation to climate change in Southern Europe. Ecol. Econ. 120, 226–233 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Leclère, D., Jayet, P.-A. & de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Farm-level autonomous adaptation of European agricultural supply to climate change. Ecol. Econ. 87, 1–14 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Dittrich, R., Wreford, A. & Moran, D. A survey of decision-making approaches for climate change adaptation: are robust methods the way forward? Ecol. Econ. 122, 79–89 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2015).
  42. Park, S. E. et al. Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environ. Change 22, 115–126 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Wheeler, S., Zuo, A. & Bjornlund, H. Farmers’ Climate Change beliefs and adaptation strategies for a water scarce future in Australia. Global Environ. Change 23, 537–547 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Water, Growth and Finance—Policy Perspectives (OECD, Paris, 2016).
  45. Grafton, R. Q., Libecap, G., McGlennon, S., Landry, C. & O'Brien, B. An integrated assessment of water markets: a cross-country comparison. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5, 219–239 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Connor, J. D. & Kaczan, D. in Drought in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions (eds Schwabe, K., Albiac, J., Connor, J. D., Hassan, R. M. & González, L. M.) 357–374 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2013).
  47. Qureshi, M. E., Schwabe, K., Connor, J. & Kirby, M. Environmental water incentive policy and return flows. Water Resour. Res. 46, W04517 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. El-Sadek, A. Virtual water trade as a solution for water scarcity in Egypt. Water Resour. Manage. 24, 2437–2448 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Porkka, M., Guillaume, J. H. A., Siebert, S., Schaphoff, S. & Kummu, M. The use of food imports to overcome local limits to growth. Earths Future 5, 393–407 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Grafton, R. Q. et al. Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 315–321 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. van Beek, L. P. H., Wada, Y. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Global monthly water stress: 1. Water balance and water availability. Water Resour. Res. 47, W07517 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  52. Wada, Y., Wisser, D. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Global modeling of withdrawal, allocation and consumptive use of surface water and groundwater resources. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 15–40 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Hanasaki, N. et al. An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – Part 1: Model description and input meteorological forcing. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 12, 1007–1025 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Flörke, M. et al. Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: a global simulation study. Global Environ. Change 23, 144–156 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Müller Schmied, H. et al. Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 3511–3538 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Warszawski, L. et al. The inter-sectoral impact model intercomparison project (ISI-MIP): project framework. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3228–3232 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references