Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (original) (raw)

Change history

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. UN General Assembly Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).
  2. Revised List of Global Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (IAEG-SDGs, 2017).
  3. Shanley, L. A., Hulbert, J. & Auerbach, J. Definitions of Citizen Science (GitHub, 2019); https://github.com/lshanley/CitSciDefinitions
  4. Espey, J. et al. Data for Development: A Needs Assessment for SDG Monitoring and Statistical Capacity Development (UNSDSN, 2015).
  5. Main Results of the UNECE-UNSD Survey on the 2010 Round of Population and Housing Censuses (UNECE and UNSD, 2009).
  6. Hsu, A., Malik, O., Johnson, L. & Esty, D. C. Development: mobilize citizens to track sustainability. Nature 508, 33–35 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. World Bank & FAO. Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics (The World Bank, 2011).
  8. Global Outlook on Financing for Sustainable Development 2019: Time to Face the Challenge (OECD, 2018).
  9. A World that Counts. Mobilising the Data Revolution for Sustainable Development (IAEG Secretariat, 2014).
  10. Arnold, S., Chen, J. & Eggers, O. Global and Complementary (Non-Authoritative) Geospatial Data for SDGs: Role and Utilization (Working Group on Geospatial Information, IAEG-SDGs, 2019).
  11. See, L. et al. in From Summits to Solutions: Innovations in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (eds Desai, R. M. et al.) 172–198 (Brookings Institution, 2018).
  12. Earth Observations in Support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development v1.1 (JAXA, GEO, 2017).
  13. MacDicken, K. G. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: what, why and how? For. Ecol. Manag. 352, 3–8 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Metadata for Indicator 15.4.2 (United Nations, 2017).
  15. Monitoring our Blue Planet: First SDG Indicator Platform Launched by Google, the JRC and UN Environment (EC, 2019).
  16. Using Citizen-Generated Data to Monitor the SDGs. A Tool for the GPSDD Data Revolution Roadmaps Toolkit (DataShift, 2017).
  17. Eitzel, M. V. et al. Citizen science terminology matters: exploring key terms. Citizen Sci.: Theory Pract. 2, 1 (2017).
    Google Scholar
  18. Citizen Science for Environmental Policy: Development of an EU-wide Inventory and Analysis of Selected Practices (Bio Innovation Service, 2018).
  19. Fithian, W., Elith, J., Hastie, T. & Keith, D. A. Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 424–438 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Shirk, J. L. et al. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecol. Soc. 17, 29 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Sullivan, B. L. et al. The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biol. Conserv. 169, 31–40 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Lukyanenko, R., Wiggins, A. & Rosser, H. K. Citizen science: an information quality research frontier. Inf. Syst. Front. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09915-z (2019).
  24. Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A. & Simmons, B. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 551–560 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Palmer, J. R. B. et al. Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nat. Commun. 8, 916 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Wiggins, A., Newman, G., Stevenson, R. D. & Crowston, K. Mechanisms for data quality and validation in citizen science. In 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops 14–19 (IEEE, 2011).
  27. Burfield, I. J. & Butchart, S. H. M. & Collar, N. J. BirdLife, conservation and taxonomy. Bird Conserv. Int. 27, 1–5 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Schuttler, S. G. et al. Citizen science in schools: students collect valuable mammal data for science, conservation, and community engagement. BioScience 69, 69–79 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Protected Planet Report 2018. Tracking Progress Towards Global Targets for Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS, 2018).
  30. Donald, P. F. et al. Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs): the development and characteristics of a global inventory of key sites for biodiversity. Bird Conserv. Int. 29, 177–198 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. CBMS Accelerated Poverty Profiling (APP): Scan, Portal, and Field Operations Manual (PEP, 2016).
  32. Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals using CBMS and LOGOD. Regional Knowledge Exchange (United Nations Development Program, 2018).
  33. Philippine Statistical Development Program: 2011-2017 Strategic Plan (NSCB, 2011).
  34. El Monitoreo Participativo del Agua (Autoridad Nacional del Agua, Gobierno del Perú, 2018).
  35. Ochoa‐Tocachi, B. F. et al. Impacts of land use on the hydrological response of tropical Andean catchments. Hydrol. Proc. 30, 4074–4089 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Toidujäätmete ja Toidukao teke Eesti Kodumajapidamistes ja Toitlustusasutustes (SEI, 2015).
  37. MAIS Program: Climate-Smart Agriculture Brazil (UNFCCC, 2018).
  38. Tarchiani, V. et al. Smallholder farmers facing climate change in West Africa: decision-making between innovation and tradition. J. Innov. Econ. 24, 151–176 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Busch, J. A., Price, I., Jeansou, E., Zielinski, O. & van der Woerd, H. J. Citizens and satellites: assessment of phytoplankton dynamics in a NW Mediterranean aquaculture zone. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 47, 40–49 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality: Towards a Global Assessment (UNEP, 2016).
  41. Cochero, J. AppEAR: Una aplicación móvil de ciencia ciudadana para mapear la calidad de los hábitats acuáticos continentales. Ecol. Austral 28, 467–479 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Ansari, R. R. & Schubert, T. General Aviation Citizen Science Study to Help Tackle Remote Sensing of Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs) (Glenn Research Center, 2018).
  43. Hadj-Hammou, J., Loiselle, S., Ophof, D. & Thornhill, I. Getting the full picture: assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data. PLOS ONE 12, e0188507 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Haklay, M. & Eleta, I. in Integrating Human Health into Urban and Transport Planning: A Framework (eds Nieuwenhuijsen, M. & Khreis, H.) 563–580 (Springer, 2019).
  45. Clements, A. L. et al. Low-cost air quality monitoring tools: from research to practice (a workshop summary). Sensors 17, 2478 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Van Brussel, S. & Huyse, H. Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 62, 534–551 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Tipper, S. Curious noses measure air quality across Flanders. Flanders Today (30 April 2018).
  48. Guidelines to Support Country Reporting on The Sustainable Development Goals (UN Development Group, 2017).
  49. Tracking Australia’s Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals 2018 (Australian Government, 2018).
  50. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Actions to Streamline Environmental Reporting COM(2017) 312 final (EC, 2017).
  51. Ministerial Declaration of the United Nations Environment Assembly at its Fourth Session. Innovative Solutions for Environmental Challenges and Sustainable Consumption and Production UNEP/EA.4/HLS.1 (UNEP, 2019).
  52. Bowser, A. et al. Citizen Science Association Data & Metadata Working Group: Report from CSA 2017 and Future Outlook (Wilson Center, 2017).
  53. Robinson, L., Cawthray, J., West, S., Bonn, A. & Ansine, J. in Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy (eds Hecker, S. et al.) 27–40 (UCL Press, 2018).
  54. Bizikova, L. & Pinter, L. Indicator Preferences in National Reporting of Progress Toward the Sustainable Development Goals (IISD, 2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Partial funding was provided by the EU’s Framework 7 European Research Council project CrowdLand (No. 617754) and the EU Horizon 2020 project WeObserve (No. 776740).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecosystem Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
    Steffen Fritz, Linda See, Dilek Fraisl, Gerid Hager, Ian McCallum, Inian Moorthy & Michael Obersteiner
  2. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
    Tyler Carlson
  3. University College London, London, UK
    Mordechai (Muki) Haklay
  4. School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    Jessie L. Oliver
  5. Australian Citizen Science Association, c/o Faculty of Science, Partner Engagement and Outreach, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    Jessie L. Oliver, Janet Anstee & Libby Hepburn
  6. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
    Dilek Fraisl
  7. Competence Center Citizen Science, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Rosy Mondardini
  8. Citizen Science Global Partnership, Washington, DC, USA
    Martin Brocklehurst
  9. European Citizen Science Association, Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Martin Brocklehurst & Margaret Gold
  10. Nelson Institute, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI, USA
    Lea A. Shanley
  11. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy
    Sven Schade
  12. IHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands
    Uta Wehn
  13. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
    Tommaso Abrate
  14. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
    Janet Anstee
  15. Federal Statistical Office – Destatis, Wiesbaden, Germany
    Stephan Arnold
  16. UN Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
    Matthew Billot & Jillian Campbell
  17. United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, NY, USA
    Jessica Espey
  18. CitizenScience.Asia, Hong Kong, China
    Shan He
  19. Yale-NUS College, Singapore, Singapore
    Angel Hsu
  20. University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
    Deborah Long
  21. Scottish Environment LINK, Perth, UK
    Deborah Long
  22. Grumets Research Group, CREAF, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
    Joan Masó
  23. African Citizen Science Association, Nairobi, Kenya
    Maina Muniafu
  24. Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington, DC, USA
    Alison J. Parker
  25. Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Maike Weisspflug
  26. Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York, York, UK
    Sarah West

Authors

  1. Steffen Fritz
  2. Linda See
  3. Tyler Carlson
  4. Mordechai (Muki) Haklay
  5. Jessie L. Oliver
  6. Dilek Fraisl
  7. Rosy Mondardini
  8. Martin Brocklehurst
  9. Lea A. Shanley
  10. Sven Schade
  11. Uta Wehn
  12. Tommaso Abrate
  13. Janet Anstee
  14. Stephan Arnold
  15. Matthew Billot
  16. Jillian Campbell
  17. Jessica Espey
  18. Margaret Gold
  19. Gerid Hager
  20. Shan He
  21. Libby Hepburn
  22. Angel Hsu
  23. Deborah Long
  24. Joan Masó
  25. Ian McCallum
  26. Maina Muniafu
  27. Inian Moorthy
  28. Michael Obersteiner
  29. Alison J. Parker
  30. Maike Weisspflug
  31. Sarah West

Contributions

All authors contributed to the concepts in the paper through a workshop held at IIASA 3–5 October 2018. S.F. and L.S. led the writing while all other authors were organized into groups, each of which contributed sections to the paper. T.C. provided text on the examples in the Philippines and Peru. M.H. provided text on citizen science for new goals and targets. J.L.O., D.F., R.M., M.B., L.A.S., S.S. and U.W. had leading roles in group organization and text provision. All authors provided comments on draft versions. Figures were provided by I. McCallum, I. Moorthy and U.W., with inputs from others.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSteffen Fritz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fritz, S., See, L., Carlson, T. et al. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.Nat Sustain 2, 922–930 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0390-3

Download citation