A seaweed aquaculture imperative to meet global sustainability targets (original) (raw)

References

1. Duarte, C. M. et al. Will the oceans help feed humanity? Bioscience 59, 967–976 (2009).
   Article Google Scholar
2. Davis, K. F. et al. Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Glob. Environ. Change 39, 125–132 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Lee, H. et al. Implementing land-based mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement in Europe requires food system transformation. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 104009 (2019).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Rebours, C. et al. Seaweeds: an opportunity for wealth and sustainable livelihood for coastal communities. J. Appl. Phycol. 26, 1939–1951 (2014).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
5. Duarte, C. M., Wu, J., Xiao, X., Bruhn, A. & Krause-Jensen, D. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00100 (2017).
6. Duarte, C. M., Marbà, N. & Holmer, M. Rapid domestication of marine species. Science 316, 382–383 (2007).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Duarte, C. M. et al. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51 (2020).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
8. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action (FAO, 2020); https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
9. Xiao, X. et al. Nutrient removal from Chinese coastal waters by large-scale seaweed aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 7, 46613 (2017).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J. & Stehfest, E. Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 927–953 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Krause-Jensen, D. & Duarte, C. M. Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Nat. Geosci. 9, 737–742 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Kambey, C. S. B. et al. An analysis of the current status and future of biosecurity frameworks for the Indonesian seaweed industry. J. Appl. Phycol. 32, 2147–2160 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Matsumura, Y. Nutrition trends in Japan. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 10, S40–S47 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Froehlich, H. E., Afflerbach, J. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. Blue growth potential to mitigate climate change through seaweed offsetting. Curr. Biol. 29, 3087–3093 (2019).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Mata, L., Magnusson, M., Paul, N. A. & de Nys, R. The intensive land-based production of the green seaweeds Derbesia tenuissima and Ulva ohnoi: biomass and bioproducts. J. Appl. Phycol. 28, 365–375 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
16. Dinerstein, E. et al. A global deal for nature: guiding principles, milestones, and targets. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2869 (2019).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
17. Le Gouvello, R. et al. Aquaculture and Marine Protected Areas: potential opportunities and synergies. Aquat. Conserv. 27, 138–150 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Mazarrasa, I., Olsen, Y. S., Mayol, E., Marbà, N. & Duarte, C. M. Rapid growth of seaweed biotechnology provides opportunities for developing nations. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 591–592 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Holdt, S. L. & Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 23, 543–597 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
20. Birch, D., Skallerud, K. & Paul, N. A. Who are the future seaweed consumers in a Western society? Insights from Australia. Br. Food J. 121, 603–615 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Wan, A. H. L., Davies, S. J., Soler-Vila, A., Fitzgerald, R. & Johnson, M. P. Macroalgae as a sustainable aquafeed ingredient. Rev. Aquac. 11, 458–492 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Makkar, H. P. S. et al. Seaweeds for livestock diets: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 212, 1–17 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Kinley, R. D. et al. Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120836 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision ESA Working Paper No. 12-03 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2012).
25. Nabti, E., Jha, B. & Hartmann, A. Impact of seaweeds on agricultural crop production as biofertilizer. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1119–1134 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
26. Guedes, A. C., Amaro, H. M., Sousa-Pinto, I. & Malcata, F. X. in Biofuels from Algae (eds Pandey, A. et al.) 397–433 (Elsevier, 2019).
27. Thomsen, M. & Zhang, X. in Sustainable Seaweed Technologies (eds Torres, M. D. et al.) 663–707 (Elsevier, 2020).
28. Farrelly, D. J., Everard, C. D., Fagan, C. C. & McDonnell, K. P. Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 21, 712–727 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
29. Melara, A. J., Singh, U. & Colosi, L. M. Is aquatic bioenergy with carbon capture and storage a sustainable negative emission technology? Insights from a spatially explicit environmental life-cycle assessment. Energy Convers. Manag. 224, 113300 (2020).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
30. Havlík, P. et al. Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39, 5690–5702 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Sadhukhan, J. et al. Novel macroalgae (seaweed) biorefinery systems for integrated chemical, protein, salt, nutrient and mineral extractions and environmental protection by green synthesis and life cycle sustainability assessments. Green Chem. 21, 2635–2655 (2019).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
32. Raikova, S., Le, C. D., Wagner, J. L., Ting, V. P. & Chuck, C. J. in Biofuels for Aviation (ed. Chuck, C. J.) 217–239 (Academic, 2016).
33. Zou, D. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism in the economic brown seaweed, Hizikia fusiforme (Sargassaceae, Phaeophyta). Aquaculture 250, 726–735 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
34. Xiao, X. et al. Seaweed farms provide refugia from ocean acidification. Sci. Total Environ. 776, 145192 (2021).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
35. Jiang, Z., Fang, J., Mao, Y., Han, T. & Wang, G. Influence of seaweed aquaculture on marine inorganic carbon dynamics and sea–air CO2 flux. J. World Aquac. Soc. 44, 133–140 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Zhang, J. et al. Growth and loss of mariculture kelp Saccharina japonica in Sungo Bay, China. J. Appl. Phycol. 24, 1209–1216 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
37. Raven, J. A. The possible roles of algae in restricting the increase in atmospheric CO2 and global temperature. Eur. J. Phycol. 52, 506–522 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
38. Lim, Y. K., Phang, S. M., Abdul Rahman, N., Sturges, W. T. & Malin, G. Halocarbon emissions from marine phytoplankton and climate change. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1355–1370 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
39. Ziska, F., Quack, B., Tegtmeier, S., Stemmler, I. & Krüger, K. Future emissions of marine halogenated very-short lived substances under climate change. J. Atmos. Chem. 74, 245–260 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
40. Steneck, R. S. et al. Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ. Conserv. 29, 436–459 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Theuerkauf, S. J. et al. Habitat value of bivalve shellfish and seaweed aquaculture for fish and invertebrates: pathways, synthesis and next steps. Rev. Aquac. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12584 (2021).
42. Nixon, S. W. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia 41, 199–219 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Neveux, N., Bolton, J. J., Bruhn, A., Roberts, D. A. & Ras, M. in Blue Biotechnology: Production and Use of Marine Molecules (eds La Barre, S. & Bates, S. S.) 217–241 (Wiley, 2018).
44. Neori, A. et al. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231, 361–391 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Kelly, E. L. A., Cannon, A. L. & Smith, J. E. Environmental impacts and implications of tropical carrageenophyte seaweed farming. Conserv. Biol. 34, 326–337 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Campbell, I. et al. The environmental risks associated with the development of seaweed farming in Europe - prioritizing key knowledge gaps. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00107 (2019).
47. Unsworth, R. K. F. et al. Indonesia’s globally significant seagrass meadows are under widespread threat. Sci. Total Environ. 634, 279–286 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
48. Williams, S. L. & Smith, J. E. A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 327–359 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
49. Ye, N.-h. et al. ‘Green tides’ are overwhelming the coastline of our blue planet: taking the world’s largest example. Ecol. Res. 26, 477 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
50. Liu, D., Keesing, J. K., Xing, Q. & Shi, P. World’s largest macroalgal bloom caused by expansion of seaweed aquaculture in China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 888–895 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
51. Pang, S. J. et al. Tracking the algal origin of the Ulva bloom in the Yellow Sea by a combination of molecular, morphological and physiological analyses. Mar. Environ. Res. 69, 207–215 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
52. Hu, C. et al. On the recurrent Ulva prolifera blooms in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005561 (2010).
53. Duan, W. et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of free-floating and attached green macroalgae Ulva spp. in the Yellow Sea of China. J. Appl. Phycol. 24, 97–108 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Xing, Q. et al. Monitoring seaweed aquaculture in the Yellow Sea with multiple sensors for managing the disaster of macroalgal blooms. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111279 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Nelson, E. et al. Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS ONE 5, e14327 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
56. Hooke, R. L., Martín Duque, J. F. & Pedraza Gilsanz, J. D. Land transformation by humans: a review. GSA Today 22, 4–10 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
57. Robledo, D., Gasca-Leyva, E. & Fraga, J. Social and Economic Dimensions of Carrageenan Seaweed Farming in Mexico Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 580 (FAO, 2013).
58. Larson, S. et al. Women’s well-being and household benefits from seaweed farming in Indonesia. Aquaculture 530, 735711 (2021).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Verbeke, W., Sioen, I., Brunsø, K., De Henauw, S. & Van Camp, J. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish: exploratory insights from Belgium. Aquac. Int. 15, 121–136 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
60. Holmer, M., Black, K., Duarte, C. M., Marbà, N. & Karakassis, I. Aquaculture in the Ecosystem (Springer, 2007).
61. Kaiser, M. & Stead, S. M. Uncertainties and values in European aquaculture: communication, management and policy issues in times of ‘changing public perceptions’. Aquac. Int. 10, 469–490 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
62. Gimpel, A. et al. A GIS modelling framework to evaluate marine spatial planning scenarios: co-location of offshore wind farms and aquaculture in the German EEZ. Mar. Policy 55, 102–115 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
63. Barbier, M. et al. Development and objectives of the PHYCOMORPH European Guidelines for the Sustainable Aquaculture of Seaweeds (PEGASUS). Bot. Mar. 63, 5–16 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
64. Cottier-Cook, E. et al. Safeguarding the Future of the Global Seaweed Aquaculture Industry (United Nations University, Institute for Water, Environment and Health, UNU-INWEH & Scottish Association for Marine Science, 2016).
65. Cabral, P. et al. Ecosystem services assessment and compensation costs for installing seaweed farms. Mar. Policy 71, 157–165 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
66. Fernand, F. et al. Offshore macroalgae biomass for bioenergy production: environmental aspects, technological achievements and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 75, 35–45 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
67. Jumaidin, R., Sapuan, S., Jawaid, M., Ishak, M. R. & Sahari, J. Seaweeds as renewable sources for biopolymers and its composites: a review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 14, 249–267 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
68. Lim, J.-Y., Hii, S.-L., Chee, S.-Y. & Wong, C.-L. Sargassum siliquosum J. Agardh extract as potential material for synthesis of bioplastic film. J. Appl. Phycol. 30, 3285–3297 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
69. Torres, M., Kraan, S. & Domínguez, H. Seaweed biorefinery. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 18, 335–388 (2019).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references