Flow cytometric analysis of normal B cell differentiation: a frame of reference for the detection of minimal residual disease in precursor-B-ALL (original) (raw)
- Original Manuscript
- Published: 10 March 1999
Immunobiology
- A Parreira1,
- MWM van den Beemd2,
- EG van Lochem2,
- ER van Wering3,
- E Baars3,
- A Porwit-MacDonald4,
- E Bjorklund4,
- G Gaipa5,
- A Biondi5,
- A Orfao6,
- G Janossy7,
- JJM van Dongen2 &
- …
- JF San Miguel6
Leukemia volume 13, pages 419–427 (1999)Cite this article
- 5433 Accesses
- 175 Citations
- 12 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Abstract
During the last two decades, major progress has been made in the technology of flow cytometry and in the availability of a large series of monoclonal antibodies against surface membrane and intracellular antigens. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping has become a diagnostic tool for the analysis of normal and malignant leukocytes and it has proven to be a reliable approach for the investigation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in leukemia patients during and after treatment. In order to standardize the flow cytometric detection of MRD in acute leukemia, a BIOMED-1 Concerted Action was initiated with the participation of six laboratories in five different European countries. This European co-operative study included the immunophenotypic characterization and enumeration of different precursor and mature B cell subpopulations in normal bone marrow (BM). The phenotypic profiles in normal B cell differentiation may form a frame of reference for the identification of aberrant phenotypes of precursor-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (precursor-B-ALL) and may therefore be helpful in MRD detection. Thirty-eight normal BM samples were anal- yzed with five different pre-selected monoclonal antibody combinations: CD10/CD20/CD19, CD34/CD38/CD19, CD34/ CD22/CD19, CD19/CD34/CD45 and TdT/CD10/CD19. Two CD19− immature subpopulations which coexpressed B cell-associated antigens were identified: CD34+/CD22+/CD19− and TdT+/CD10+/CD19−, which represented 0.11 ± 0.09% and 0.04 ± 0.05% of the total BM nucleated cells, respectively. These immunophenotypes may correspond to the earliest stages of B cell differentiation. In addition to these minor subpopulations, three major CD19+ B cell subpop- ulations were identified, representing three consecutive maturation stages; CD19dim/CD34+/TdT+/CD10bright/CD22dim/ CD45dim/CD38bright/CD20− (subpopulation 1), CD19+/CD34−/ TdT−/CD10+/CD22dim/CD45+/CD38bright/CD20dim (subpopulation 2) and CD19+/CD34−/TdT−/CD10−/CD22bright/CD45bright/CD38dim/ CD20bright (subpopulation 3). The relative sizes of subpopulations 1 and 2 were found to be age related: at the age of 15 years, the phenotypic precursor-B cell profile in BM changed from the childhood 'immature' profile (large subpopulations 1 and 2/small subpopulation 3) to the adult 'mature' profile (small subpopulation 1 and 2/large subpopulation 3). When the immunophenotypically defined precursor-B cell subpopulations from normal BM samples are projected in fluorescence dot-plots, templates for the normal B cell differentiation pathways can be defined and so-called 'empty spaces' where no cell populations are located become evident. This allows discrimination between normal and malignant precursor-B cells and can therefore be used for MRD detection.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Department of Hematology, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
P Lúcio & A Parreira - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Department of Immunology, University Hospital Dijkzigt/Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
MWM van den Beemd, EG van Lochem & JJM van Dongen - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group, The Hague, The Netherlands
ER van Wering & E Baars - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Department of Pathology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
A Porwit-MacDonald & E Bjorklund - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Clinica Pediatrica, University of Milan, Ospedale San Genaro, Monza, Italy
G Gaipa & A Biondi - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Department of Hematology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
A Orfao & JF San Miguel - BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: Department of Immunology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
G Janossy
Authors
- P Lúcio
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - A Parreira
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - MWM van den Beemd
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - EG van Lochem
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - ER van Wering
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - E Baars
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - A Porwit-MacDonald
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - E Bjorklund
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - G Gaipa
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - A Biondi
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - A Orfao
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - G Janossy
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - JJM van Dongen
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - JF San Miguel
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lúcio, P., Parreira, A., van den Beemd, M. et al. Flow cytometric analysis of normal B cell differentiation: a frame of reference for the detection of minimal residual disease in precursor-B-ALL.Leukemia 13, 419–427 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401279
- Received: 29 December 1997
- Accepted: 21 October 1998
- Published: 10 March 1999
- Issue Date: 01 March 1999
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401279