Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function (original) (raw)

Nature volume 400, pages 418–419 (1999)Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 16 December 1999

Abstract

In the ageing process, neural areas1,2 and cognitive processes3,4 do not degrade uniformly. Executive control processes and the prefrontal and frontal brain regions that support them show large and disproportionate changes with age. Studies of adult animals indicate that metabolic5 and neurochemical6 functions improve with aerobic fitness. We therefore investigated whether greater aerobic fitness in adults would result in selective improvements in executive control processes, such as planning, scheduling, inhibition and working memory. Over a period of six months, we studied 124 previously sedentary adults, 60 to 75 years old, who were randomly assigned to either aerobic (walking) or anaerobic (stretching and toning) exercise. We found that those who received aerobic training showed substantial improvements in performance on tasks requiring executive control compared with anaerobically trained subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Tasks predicted to show selective improvements in performance for the walking but not for the toning group.

References

  1. Coffey, C. E. et al. Neurology 42, 527–536 (1992).
    Google Scholar
  2. Azari, N. P. et al. Brain Res. 552, 279–290 (1992).
    Google Scholar
  3. West, R. L. Psychol. Bull. 120, 272–290 (1996).
    Google Scholar
  4. Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., Weber, T. A. & Bardell, L. in Attention and Performance Vol. XVII (ed. Gopher, D. & Koriat, A.) (Academic, New York, 1999).
  5. Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A. & Greenough, W. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 5568–5572 (1990).
    Google Scholar
  6. Neeper, S. A., Gomez-Pinilla, F., Choi, J. & Cotman, C. Nature 373, 109 (1995).
    Google Scholar
  7. Rogers, R. D. et al. Brain 121, 815–842 (1998).
    Google Scholar
  8. Rafal, R., Gershberg, F., Egly, R. & Ivry, R. Neuropsychologia 34, 1197–1202 (1996).
    Google Scholar
  9. Hanes, D. P., Patterson, W. F. & Schall, J. D. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 817–834 (1998).
    Google Scholar
  10. Dustman, R. E., Emmerson, R. & Shearer, D. J. Ageing Phys. Activ. 2, 143–181 (1994).
    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, 61801, Illinois, USA
    Arthur F. Kramer, Sowon Hahn, Neal J. Cohen, Marie T. Banich, Edward McAuley, Catherine R. Harrison, Julie Chason, Lynn Bardell, Richard A. Boileau & Angela Colcombe
  2. Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
    Eli Vakil

Authors

  1. Arthur F. Kramer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Sowon Hahn
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Neal J. Cohen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Marie T. Banich
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Edward McAuley
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Catherine R. Harrison
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Julie Chason
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Eli Vakil
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Lynn Bardell
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Richard A. Boileau
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Angela Colcombe
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kramer, A., Hahn, S., Cohen, N. et al. Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function.Nature 400, 418–419 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/22682

Download citation

This article is cited by