Transplantation of a circadian pacemaker in Drosophila (original) (raw)

Nature volume 279, pages 236–238 (1979)Cite this article

Abstract

A MAJOR question in the physiology of activity rhythms is the nature of the coupling between the pacemaker and the motor system. There is good evidence for humoral coupling in several species. In the sparrow, pineal organs from donor birds maintained in a light–dark cycle different from that of the host were transplanted into the anterior chamber of the eye of recipient birds made arrhythmic by pinealectomy. In this case the activity rhythm of the host was restored and its phase was determined by a diffusible humoral factor from the implanted pineal1. In the mollusc Aplysia humoral coupling between the circadian pacemaker and the output cells is thought to control locomotor activity, although electrical coupling has not been ruled out2. In insects, however, experiments involving cockroaches and silkmoths indicate that an intact electrical connection between the brain and thoracic ganglia is required for rhythmic activity. The pacemaker controlling the locomotor activity rhythm in the cockroach appears to reside in the optic lobes, and disruption of the electrical pathway between the optic lobes and thoracic ganglia results in arrhythmicity3–6. Initial transplant experiments with this insect indicated that activity could be hormonally controlled by the sub-oesophageal ganglion7. While these results have not been repeatable by other laboratories8–10, evidence from parabiosis experiments does suggest some humoral influence on the activity rhythm11. Surgical experiments using giant silkmoths have also demonstrated the need for an intact neural connection between brain and thorax for expression of the flight activity rhythm12. Thus, until now, there has been no unambiguous evidence for humoral control of activity rhythms in insects. Here we show that a short-period mutant brain can produce a short-period activity rhythm when implanted into the abdomen of a genetically arrhythmic host. In this instance, there were no functional neural connections between the implanted brain and the locomotor system of the recipient, so the action of the brain must be mediated by humoral influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zimmerman, N. H. & Menaker, M. Science 190, 477–479 (1975).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Strumwasser, F. J. psychiat. Res. 8, 237–257 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Nishiitsutsuji-Uwo, J. & Pittendrigh, C. S. Z. vergl. Physiol. 58, 14–46 (1968).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Brady, J. in Biochronometry (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1971).
    Google Scholar
  5. Roberts, S. K. deF. J. comp. Physiol. 88, 21–30 (1974).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Sokolove, P. G. Brain Res. 87, 13–21 (1975).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Harker, J. E. Nature 175, 733 (1955).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  8. Leuthold, R. J. Insect Physiol. 12, 1303–1331 (1966).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Roberts, S. K. deF. J. cell. Physiol. 67, 473–486 (1966).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Brady, J. J. exp. Biol. 47, 165–178 (1967).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Cymborowski, B. & Brady, J. Nature new Biol. 236, 221–222 (1972).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Truman, J. W. J. comp. Physiol. 95, 281–296 (1974).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Konopka, R. J. & Benzer, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 2112–2116 (1971).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  14. Konopka, R. J. in The Molecular Basis of Circadian Rhythms (Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, 1976).
    Google Scholar
  15. Ephrussi, B. & Beadle, G. Am. Nat. 70, 218–225 (1936).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology 216–76, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 91125
    ALFRED M. HANDLER & RONALD J. KONOPKA

Authors

  1. ALFRED M. HANDLER
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. RONALD J. KONOPKA
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HANDLER, A., KONOPKA, R. Transplantation of a circadian pacemaker in Drosophila.Nature 279, 236–238 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/279236a0

Download citation

This article is cited by