An explanation for enhanced virus plaque formation in chick embryo cells (original) (raw)

Nature volume 285, pages 504–505 (1980)Cite this article

Abstract

While studying virus neutralization of many togaviruses by antisera raised in chickens, Hawkes and Lafferty1,2 observed a significant increase of plaque counts above controls when virus–antibody mixtures were assayed on chick embryo (CE) cell monolayers, or monolayers derived from other avian embryos. Among those antisera tested, partial neutralizing activity was observed at low dilutions and plaque enhancement at high dilutions above the neutralizing end point. These studies interested us because of the many apparent similarities between plaque enhancement and enhanced replication of dengue virus in mononuclear phagocytes. The latter has been shown to be mediated by anti-dengue IgG at dilutions above neutralization end points. When non-neutralized immune complexes are formed between dengue virus and antibody molecules, the Fc termini attach to cell receptors and complexes are internalized; this facilitates infection and results in enhanced production of virus3,4. The same phenomenon has been extended to West Nile (WN) virus demonstrated on mouse macrophage cell lines by Peiris and Porterfield5. Here, we have examined the infection of CE cells with virus–antibody complexes of another flavivirus, Murray Valley encephalitis (MVE) virus. Our results show that a similar mechanism operates in the antibody-mediated viral plaque enhancement of MVE virus on CE cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawkes, R. A. Aust. J. exp. Biol. med. Sci. 42, 465–482 (1964).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Hawkes, R. A. & Lafferty, K. J. Virology 33, 250–261 (1967).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Halstead, S. B. & O'Rourke, E. J. J. exp. Med. 146, 201–217 (1977).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Halstead, S. B., O'Rourke, E. J. & Allison, A. C. J. exp. Med. 146, 218–229 (1977).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Peiris, J. S. M. & Porterfield, J. S. Nature 282, 509–511 (1979).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Porter, R. R. Biochem. J. 73, 119–126 (1959).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Ewald, S., Freedman, L. & Sanders, B. G. Cell. Immun. 31, 847–854 (1976).
    CAS Google Scholar
  8. Ewald, S., Freedman, L. & Sanders, B. G. Cell. Immun. 23, 158–170 (1976).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Dickler, H. B. J. exp. Med. 140, 508–521 (1974).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Lee, L. F. Avian Dis. 18, 602–609 (1974).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Tropical Medicine and Medical Microbiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96816
    Srisakul C. Kliks & Scott B. Halstead

Authors

  1. Srisakul C. Kliks
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Scott B. Halstead
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kliks, S., Halstead, S. An explanation for enhanced virus plaque formation in chick embryo cells.Nature 285, 504–505 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/285504a0

Download citation

This article is cited by