Prevalence of amber suppressor-containing coliforms in the natural environment (original) (raw)

Nature volume 286, pages 524–525 (1980)Cite this article

Abstract

Amber suppressible genes have been introduced into vectors1,2 and proposed for use in recombinant DNA studies. Such genes can be expressed only in a host bacterium with amber suppressors. To assess the biological containment of this kind of mutation we have now examined the frequency of bacteria with amber suppressors in faecal samples from humans and animals in different environments. This approach allowed us to evaluate the number of individuals in an environment bearing bacteria with amber suppressor mutations and the frequency of these bacteria within the faecal samples of each individual. Of all individuals sampled 30.5% contained detectable levels of bacteria with amber suppressor activity. In >75% of these samples, the level of suppressor-containing bacteria was <10%, about half of which were <1%. Most of these were Escherichia coli: however, Citrobacter and Klebsiella were also found. In three samples, essentially all coliforms had suppressor activity. Excluding these three samples, the estimated frequency of amber suppressors among faecal coliforms was 1.5%; however, if the data from these individuals were included, the overall frequency among faecal samples could be as high as 10%. By itself, the finding suggests that amber suppressor mutations in recombinant DNA vectors may not offer as great a safety feature as originally considered. These data, however, must be considered together with the known low sensitivity of wild-type E. coli to laboratory phages3,4 and their low recipient ability for some plasmids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blattner, F. R. et al. Science 196, 161–169 (1977).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Enquist, L., Tiemier, D., Leder, P., Weisberg, R. & Sternberg, N. Nature 259, 596–598 (1976).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Leder, P., Tiemier, D. & Enquist, L. Science 196, 175–177 (1977).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Robeson, J. P., Goldschmidt, R. M. & Curtiss, R. III Nature 283, 104–106 (1980).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Mindich, L., Cohen, J. & Weisburd, M. J. Bact. 126, 177–182 (1976).
    CAS Google Scholar
  6. Russell, R. L. et al. J. molec. Biol. 47, 1–13 (1970).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Lederberg, J. & Lederberg, E. M. J. Bact. 63, 399–406 (1952).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Molecular Biology and Microbiology and of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
    Bonnie Marshall & Stuart B. Levy

Authors

  1. Bonnie Marshall
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Stuart B. Levy
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, B., Levy, S. Prevalence of amber suppressor-containing coliforms in the natural environment.Nature 286, 524–525 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286524a0

Download citation