Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology (original) (raw)

References

  1. Boyce, M. S. Population viability analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 481–506 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Beissinger, S. R. & Westphal, M. I. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 62, 821–841 (1998).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Groom, M. J. & Pascual, M. A. in Conservation Biology (eds Fiedler, P. L. & Kareiva, P. M.) 4–27 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  4. Norton, T. W. (ed.) Special issue: applications of population viability analysis to biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 73, 91– 176 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. International Union for the Conservation of Nature. IUCN Red List Categories (Gland, Switzerland, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  6. Caughley, G. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215–244 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Taylor, B. L. The reliability of using population viability analysis for risk classification of species. Conserv. Biol. 9, 551– 558 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Ludwig, D. Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction? Ecology 80, 298–310 ( 1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Possingham, H. P., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Norton, T. W. A framework for the improvement of threatened species based on population viability analysis (PVA). Pac. Conserv. Biol. 1, 38–45 (1993 ).
    Google Scholar
  10. Ralls, K. & Taylor, B. L. in The Ecological Basis of Conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems, and Biodiversity (eds Pickett, S. B. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. & Likens, G. E.) 228– 235 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).
    Book Google Scholar
  11. Talbot, J. Land and Environment Court of New South Wales: Record of Hearing #10151 of 1994 (Court Report, Sydney, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  12. Soulé, M. E. & Kohm, K. A. Research Priorities for Conservation Biology (Island, Washington DC, 1989 ).
    Google Scholar
  13. Brook, B. W., Lim, L., Harden, R. & Frankham, R. Does population viability analysis software predict the behaviour of real populations? A retrospective study on the Lord Howe Island woodhen Tricholimnas sylvestris (Sclater). Biol. Conserv. 82, 119– 128 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Brook, B. W., Cannon, J. R., Lacy, R. C., Mirande, C. & Frankham, R. A comparison of the population viability analysis packages GAPPS, INMAT, RAMAS and VORTEX for the Whooping crane (Grus americana). Anim. Conserv. 2, 23–31 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Wigley, T. M. L. Climate change: a successful prediction? Nature 376 , 463–464 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Ramanathan, R. Introductory Econometrics with Applications 2nd edn (Dryden, Fort Worth, 1995).
    Google Scholar
  17. Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frenchette, K. & Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and the confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263, 641–646 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273, 1536– 1538 (1996).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Huggard, D. J. A linear programming model of herbivore foraging: imprecise, yet successful? Oecologia 100, 470–474 (1994).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Belovsky, G. E. How good must models and data be in ecology? Oecologia 100, 475–480 (1994).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  21. Ginzburg, L. R., Slobodkin, L. B., Johnson, K. & Bindman, A. G. Quasiextinction probabilities as a measure of impact on population growth. Risk Anal. 2, 171–182 (1982).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 4th edn (Freeman, New York, 1995).
    MATH Google Scholar
  23. Akçakaya, H. R., Burgman, M. A. & Ginzburg, L. R. Applied Population Ecology 2nd edn (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1999).
    Google Scholar
  24. Grenfell, B. T., Price, O. F., Albon, S. D. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Overcompensation and population cycles in an ungulate. Nature 355, 823–826 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  25. Burgman, M. A., Ferson, S. & Akçakaya, H. R. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993).
    Google Scholar
  26. Zeckhauser, R. J. & Viscusi, W. K. Risk within reason. Science 248, 559– 564 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  27. Mills, L. S. et al. Factors leading to different viability predictions for a grizzly bear data set. Conserv. Biol. 10, 863– 873 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Reynolds, M. R., Burkhart, H. E. & Daniels, R. F. Procedures for statistical validation of stochastic simulation models. Forest Sci. 27, 349– 364 (1981).
    Google Scholar
  29. Arnqvist, G. & Wooster, D. Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 236–240 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references